View Single Post
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 28, 2003, 09:34am
DownTownTonyBrown DownTownTonyBrown is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,474
Thumbs down Agree with poor interp.

Quote:
Originally posted by CecilOne
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
IMHO, a ludicrous interpretation whether intentional or not.
Does that mean that when a batter is "walked" and the catcher throws to 1st, as a precaution or whatever,
Precaution for what? There is none. The only plausible reason that a catcher would throw to 1st is if the runner had rounded the base (is now beyond the 3 foot lane) and is now trying to draw a throw/play. The batter runner is not in jeopardy of being thrown out between home and 1st... I agree with those that have said it is a very poor interpretation to allow a runner that is not in jeopardy to be called out because the catcher wants to hit them in the back with a thrown ball... because they are not in the 3 foot lane.

There is no reason for the catcher to make that throw. I would be willing to toss the catcher if I felt his hitting the BR was intentional.
__________________
"There are no superstar calls. We don't root for certain teams. We don't cheat. But sometimes we just miss calls." - Joe Crawford
Reply With Quote