Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve
Here's the play that would be affected without that statement.
With 1 out, R2 on 3rd, R3 on 1st. Batter singles to right; R2 scores, while R3 misses 2nd on the way to 3rd. F9 throws to 3rd; ball is cut off and BR/R4 is thrown out at 2nd for the 2nd out. Defense requests time, and appeals that R3 missed 2nd base; 3rd out. Does the run score?
If the rule is a force at the time of the miss, this WAS a force out; no run scores. If the rule is a force at the time of the appeal, the run scores, as the trailing runner was put out prior to the appeal.
IMO, at the time of the miss is the more appropriate rule. But someone with influence convinced at National Council to erase the force when this happens.
|
IMO, USA has it right since if there was some reason to retreat, the base from which the runner was forced is now available for safe occupation. Their interpretation is consistent with the other rules of the game governing runners.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Last edited by IRISHMAFIA; Mon Jul 10, 2017 at 10:06pm.
|