The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Volleyball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 18, 2004, 03:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 18
This came up in our association meeting last night and I wondered what the views were on here.

The topic was blockers at the net with their hands up to the net. Ball for whatver reason is passed into the net on the other side forcing the ball into the hands of the player at the net. Now comes the real question, some players have been taught to stand at the net with their hands directed down so when the ball hits into the net, it hits their hands and is directed immediately to the floor. Is this a violation if the player makes no attempt to move their hands?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 19, 2004, 01:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 73
Judgment call. Did the player make "intentional contact"? And did it interfere with an attempt to play the ball.

See rule 9-6-7.d.2.

Most of the time, it won't be an issue with an attack which goes into the net - the attack is the third hit and there can be no interference with an attempt to play the ball as the attacking team has no more hits left. Then, the only question
is whether the "force of the ball push(ed) the net or net cables into the player". If so, no violation. If not, net violation on defensive player. Rule 9-6-7.a.

If the attacking team still has a hit left, then it's a judgment call as to whether the contact was intentional and whether it interfered with an attempt to play the ball.

-Homer-


Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 19, 2004, 02:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,273
Quote:
Originally posted by Homer
Judgment call. Did the player make "intentional contact"? And did it interfere with an attempt to play the ball.

See rule 9-6-7.d.2.

Most of the time, it won't be an issue with an attack which goes into the net - the attack is the third hit and there can be no interference with an attempt to play the ball as the attacking team has no more hits left. Then, the only question
is whether the "force of the ball push(ed) the net or net cables into the player". If so, no violation. If not, net violation on defensive player. Rule 9-6-7.a.

If the attacking team still has a hit left, then it's a judgment call as to whether the contact was intentional and whether it interfered with an attempt to play the ball.

-Homer-


Yep!

Had a real fun one at a tournament last Saturday.....

1.Team A returns the ball with a long arcing bump towards the net on the 3rd hit, but it doesn't have quite enough energy to make it over.
2.Player from team B jumps up to block & reaches over the net trying to get to the ball, but can't quite get to it.
3.The ball goes into the net at about mid height, knocking net it into blocker B, then rebounding into A's court.
4.When coming down from the attempted block, blocker B doesn't get her hands back quickly enough and makes downward contact on the top of the net before the rebounding ball hits the floor.

My ruling: Net violation on B - point to team A.

Coach B of course went slightly nuts, claiming the ball into the net caused the contact. I told her she was correct about the net contact to the body caused by the ball, but the second contact was caused solely by her player reaching across the net to try to block and not getting back in time, and because the ball was still live when she contacted the net(hadn't hit the ground yet and no foul had occurred) it was a net violation.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 19, 2004, 08:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sheffield Lake, Ohio
Posts: 340
I had the identical situation last night in a Jr. High game - as the Referee.
Team A hits their third hit into the top of the net. I am not sure if the ball would have cleared the net or not, but Team B blocker jumps to block and the force of Team A's hit pushes net and ball into blockers hands. Team B blocker, instead of holding her ground straight up, decides to attack the ball and hits the net with her hands as she drives the ball back to Team A side of court. I call a net violation - even though the ball may never have crossed over the net - because the ball was in play until either it hits the floor or a foul occurs. I believe that was the correct call.
Any interpretations?
__________________
Tony Smerk
OHSAA Certified
Class 1 Official
Sheffield Lake, Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 11, 2004, 01:14pm
Resident VB Rules Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Jose, CA - the Capital of Silicon Valley
Posts: 481
Send a message via AIM to MCBear Send a message via MSN to MCBear Send a message via Yahoo to MCBear Send a message via Skype™ to MCBear
Tony, good call! Until the ball touches the court, touches a player for a fourth contact, or lands out of bounds, it is alive. In your scenario, the player committed a net foul before any of these occurred.
__________________
Jan G. Filip - San Jose, CA
EBVOA Rules Interpreter Emeritus
NCS Volleyball Officials Coordinating Committee Recorder
CIF State Volleyball State Championships Referee (2005), Scorekeeper (2006-2007) & Libero Tracker (2010)
PAVO State Referee (2014) / PAVO Certified Scorekeeper (2014) / PAVO Certified Line Judge (2012)
USAV Junior National Referee (resigned 2013) / USAV National Scorekeeper (2014)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1