![]() |
|
|||
|
NFHS double libero wording issue?
Looking at the wording in the new books, I'm wondering if this will cause issues...
ART. 1 . . . Procedures for libero replacement: a. The libero designated on the lineup for that set is allowed to replace any player in a back-row position. The libero may serve in one position in the serve order; b. The libero may only be replaced by the player whom the libero replaced; As per usual NFHS hasnt copied directly from another rule set that allows double liberos. So if we have Libero #1 and Libero #2, and #1 has replaced back row player #3..can #2 replace #1 or does #3 have to come in because of the way B is written or does the wording in A allow the lib #2 to replace #1 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DP/FLEX - NFHS wording | Cecil4 | Softball | 7 | Thu Mar 20, 2025 04:44pm |
| Libero (NFHS) | Zoochy | Volleyball | 5 | Thu Sep 09, 2010 03:17pm |
| Double foul shot clock issue | CA BBall Ref | Basketball | 1 | Sun Jan 22, 2006 09:17am |
| Double base, errant throw issue | IRISHMAFIA | Softball | 8 | Mon Jul 08, 2002 11:30am |
| Moving Screen issue. Is this the proper wording. | JRutledge | Basketball | 5 | Wed Dec 26, 2001 10:19am |