The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Volleyball (https://forum.officiating.com/volleyball/)
-   -   Double contact on 1 hit (https://forum.officiating.com/volleyball/105529-double-contact-1-hit.html)

Zoochy Sat Oct 16, 2021 10:05am

Double contact on 1 hit
 
We have all seen on the 1st ball over the net a Hand/Hand, Arm/Arm and Arm/Chest double contact as legal contact. I observed a Chest/Arm double contact that WAS NOT a Lift. The official ruled 2-Hits.
Does hitting the Chest 1st negate any chance that a double contact can be valid?

Lcubed48 Sun Oct 17, 2021 06:44am

Imo
 
The play that you saw was ruled incorrectly, IMO. Rule 9-4-8b says that multiple contacts by a single player on the first hit are legal.

bob jenkins Sun Oct 17, 2021 08:27am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoochy (Post 1045139)
We have all seen on the 1st ball over the net a Hand/Hand, Arm/Arm and Arm/Chest double contact as legal contact. I observed a Chest/Arm double contact that WAS NOT a Lift. The official ruled 2-Hits.
Does hitting the Chest 1st negate any chance that a double contact can be valid?

Can't say without seeing video. It's possible that the first attempt resulted in the ball hitting the chest and the player made a separate attempt that was hit with the arm. That would be two hits.

Zoochy Sun Oct 17, 2021 11:21am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 1045141)
Can't say without seeing video. It's possible that the first attempt resulted in the ball hitting the chest and the player made a separate attempt that was hit with the arm. That would be two hits.

The play was NOT 2 separate attempts. When we discussed the play, he ruled the play from the chest eliminated the chance of a legal double contact play

bob jenkins Mon Oct 18, 2021 07:43am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoochy (Post 1045142)
he ruled the play from the chest eliminated the chance of a legal double contact play

That ruling is incorrect.

Scrapper1 Wed Oct 20, 2021 10:14am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoochy (Post 1045142)
he ruled the play from the chest eliminated the chance of a legal double contact play

I'd be real interested in hearing the rationale for that ruling. . .

Zoochy Wed Oct 20, 2021 01:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1 (Post 1045177)
I'd be real interested in hearing the rationale for that ruling. . .

I respectively disagreed with him. He could not find anything in the Rules Book to support his claim. I was not about to debate with him, it was not going to change his opinion.
Thus I brought the post to this site.
Everybody, thanks for your replies

bob jenkins Wed Oct 20, 2021 08:42pm

That's one of the ways we learn the rules. I know I've learned my share only after kicking the ruling.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1