Injury "Timeout"

[Dakota]

Originally Posted by chapmaja

You may want to read the wording in 3-6-15. The word I used was question, not argue. There is a difference, and it is a fine line of difference, but it is a difference.

The word is not limited to vein-popping, red-faced, dirt kicking arguing. Continually disputing or questioning is arguing.

[Dakota]

You didn't answer my earlier question... was there a time limit on this game?

[chapmaja]

Originally Posted by Dakota

The word is not limited to vein-popping, red-faced, dirt kicking arguing. Continually disputing or questioning is arguing.

Now you sound like my GF. Stop.

No time limit on the game. If there was, it may have impacted a decision on how much time to give, then again maybe not.

[Dakota]

Originally Posted by chapmaja

Now you sound like my GF. Stop.

No time limit on the game. If there was, it may have impacted a decision on how much time to give, then again maybe not.

If you don't want advice, don't post. Stop.

If it was not a time limit game, then the coach had no basis for questioning how long the injury timeout was. That was the reason for my question.

[UmpireErnie]

And if it was a time limit game the umpire should be able to suspend time for a lengthy injury time out.

[chapmaja]

Originally Posted by Dakota

If you don't want advice, don't post. Stop.I was JOKING.

If it was not a time limit game, then the coach had no basis for questioning how long the injury timeout was. That was the reason for my question.

I had no problem with you asking about a time limit, I think it is a fair question to ask.