Infield Fly
Bases loaded, no out, pop up directly over 1B line. "Infield Fly if fair"... BR interferes with F3's catch attempt as the ball hits BR over fair territory.
We now have 2 outs and R1 is removed from 3B, correct? |
Quote:
I'll let you find the appropriate rule, but 2 things - a DP is contingent on the umpire's judgement, which you don't supply... and if BR interfered, the ball never hit BR - the play ended at the moment of interference. |
Is the (no longer) BR not now a retired runner interfering with a play?
OK, let's look at it this way... a) Runners stick to their bases as ball lands on the ground (after BR & F3 collide) or b) Ball skips off F3's glove (after BR & F3 collide) & rolls further infield, chaos ensues, R1 is able to score. Just wanna see a new thread here ;) |
Quote:
But you don't have to go to that trouble. It's 8-2-I. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I see the scenario has already changed a couple times, so nevermind :rolleyes:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also, with the runners "stuck" to their respective base at the time the ball becomes dead eliminates a 2nd out since there is no possible play. However, if for some ridiculous reason any of the runners attempted to advance and there was a possible play had the retired BR not interfered, the 8.7.P may come into effect. |
Quote:
I guess I read the OP differently, with "BR interferes with F3's catch attempt" meaning contact between fielder and BR, and then BR getting hit by the ball. I do see, upon re-reading, how you took it that it was the BR getting hit by the ball that WAS the interference. (Same ruling though, right?) |
Quote:
Let's go from here based on the INT occurring prior to the ball hitting the BR, or actually the retired BR. Based on the assumption that the ball was over fair territory at the time of the INT, that player is retired. IMO, the IF is in effect as soon as the umpire declares to be so since there is not an "oops, nevermind" option. I believe the assumption that when called, the ball is fair unless it is determined to be foul at a later point in time. The ball becoming foul after the declaration is basically the exception as opposed to the rule. Regardless, in the OP even if the ball is foul, the BR is out, there is no other option with an INT call. That being a possible case on point, would not the only question be is whether the defense was deprived of the opportunity to retire another runner because of the INT. |
Quote:
In that the IFF was declared, you are saying that it was a ball that could have been caught with ordinary effort. Base runners simply do not tag up on an IFF, especially when the defender is less than 60 feet from home plate. |
Irish, sorry for clouding the issue with the ball possibly going foul... it didn't.
I only described it as directly over the line in order to put the BR's running path, the ball, and F3 all on a collision path. And it is probably the only ball location in which the BR could get in the way. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23pm. |