The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 17, 2013, 03:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Yeah, I think this is one that ASA had right, but changed for no apparent reason than to be like the other guys.

The change actually penalizes the defense based upon an offensive violation.
Since we don't all have the new books yet, can anyone post the text of the rule? I'd like to see how it changes other scenarios.

Is the simplest way to state the effect that we're simply negating anything the improper did, assigning an out to the batter who failed to bat, and letting any other outs (that are not on the improper batter) stand?

So - no one on base; B4 bats where B2 should have and A) got on base; B) got out - in both A and B, we have 1 out, no one on, and B3 up?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2013 BRD: Baseball Rule Differences Carl Childress Baseball 3 Thu Jan 17, 2013 02:38pm
2013 ASA test SRW Softball 0 Wed Jan 16, 2013 01:08pm
2013 Blue Convention blue man Softball 0 Mon Dec 31, 2012 06:29pm
2013 NCAA-M recommendations Raymond Basketball 4 Thu May 17, 2012 02:53pm
What Would You Change? jkumpire Baseball 0 Sat Apr 21, 2007 08:34pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1