![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Do you accept an argument from a coach when he tells you he knows the rule because he checked at Heybucket.com? Would you expect a clinician to accept this or any other board when addressing a rule or interpretation at a clinic or on the field? One of the quickest ways for an umpire to kill his/her rules knowledge credibility with a UIC is to start the explanation of a call with, "Well, at home....." or "On the game on TV the other night..." Had a guy reference what was done "at home" in OKC one time, and I think they heard the UIC in the guy's home state (CA). You talk about how valuable this is and how much you learned here, yet when people are trying to prod a newbie into researching and discovering the rules, you chastise them. Did everyone just give you test answers when you first joined? I'm pretty sure that wasn't the case. Look, this and other boards can be a great source of information. Between here, McGriffs and other umpiring sites, we've had some great discussions, arguments and even discoveries that led to rule changes and interpretations. However, these boards are not a substitute for a school, clinic, seminar or study session. One may learn some of the mechanics, some of the rules and interpretations, but someone isn't going to become an umpire from coming to websites to learn.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Interference Question | FullCount | Softball | 10 | Thu Apr 22, 2010 06:15pm |
| Interference Question | travlinmatt | Baseball | 11 | Tue May 26, 2009 02:39pm |
| interference question | MJT | Softball | 29 | Tue Jun 05, 2007 03:32pm |
| Interference Question? | afrothunda | Baseball | 3 | Thu May 25, 2006 09:56pm |
| Interference Question | Stair-Climber | Softball | 8 | Sat Jun 11, 2005 09:49pm |