The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 29, 2003, 02:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 962
Was looking for opinions on interp for "both feet must be on the ground within the 24-inch length of the pitcher's plate." ASA 6.1.A Do you interperate this as both feet have to be completely within the 24" or just partially within? Question came up when a pitcher had 1/2 of her foot on the rubber and the other half beside the rubber. My plate ump thought this was illegal and I didn't. I had always been told as long as part of the foot was within it was OK. Who was right? Also wondering if FED is different.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 29, 2003, 04:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by DaveASA/FED
Was looking for opinions on interp for "both feet must be on the ground within the 24-inch length of the pitcher's plate." ASA 6.1.A Do you interperate this as both feet have to be completely within the 24" or just partially within? Question came up when a pitcher had 1/2 of her foot on the rubber and the other half beside the rubber. My plate ump thought this was illegal and I didn't. I had always been told as long as part of the foot was within it was OK. Who was right? Also wondering if FED is different.
If the pitcher's plate is 24" wide and part of the foot is off the side, then the foot is not "within" the 24", is it?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 29, 2003, 05:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 476
Send a message via ICQ to SamNVa Send a message via AIM to SamNVa Send a message via Yahoo to SamNVa
FED specifically states that both feet must be within or partially within the 24" width of the pitcher's plate.

They also have a nice little picture showing the non-pivot foot, half in and half out of the 24" width and note that this is legal. I would assume that the same is true for the pivot foot too.

SamC

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 29, 2003, 06:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4
Good Call.

SamC,

Good call. Much like the rest of the rules in ASA, like the foul ball, out of play area, etc. As long as any part of something is on said line, it's in.

Jason A
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 30, 2003, 06:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Re: Good Call.

Quote:
Originally posted by Jason A
SamC,

Good call. Much like the rest of the rules in ASA, like the foul ball, out of play area, etc. As long as any part of something is on said line, it's in.

Jason A
Jason,

Sam was referencing NFHS, not ASA. The requirements are different. Pitching requirements are part of the glaring differences between Fed and ASA.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 30, 2003, 09:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
What I have been taught (for ASA) is that "within" means "inside." ASA allows touch only front and back, but "within" left and right.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1