The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 03, 2003, 06:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 166
Question

I need some opinions on this.The old ground ball to second or shortstop with a runner leaving first or second crossing.On the play I just had the runner at first gets in front of the secondbaseman just as the ball is coming and sort of tiptoes and appears to screen her a little and goes by.The ball bounces off the girls glove and everybody is safe.The runner never stopped and only appeared to be avoiding the ball so since I was by myself I let it go.At what point do the rest of you call that interference?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 04, 2003, 06:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 190
Thumbs up

The runner is crossing in front of the fielder. If the runner stops, or slows down to put herself in front of the runner I probably have interferance. If the runner is just running to the next base, and doesn't do anything unusal or out of the ordinary, there is no interferance, IMO
__________________
Bob
Del-Blue
NCAA, ASA, NFHS
NIF
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 04, 2003, 08:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by refjef40
I need some opinions on this.The old ground ball to second or shortstop with a runner leaving first or second crossing.On the play I just had the runner at first gets in front of the secondbaseman just as the ball is coming and sort of tiptoes and appears to screen her a little and goes by.The ball bounces off the girls glove and everybody is safe.The runner never stopped and only appeared to be avoiding the ball so since I was by myself I let it go.At what point do the rest of you call that interference?
Bob is correct here. If all she was doing was checking-up to avoid being hit by the ball and the ball passed her prior to her passing the infielder, it is nothing.

From the scenario above, I don't quite get whether the runner waited and then crossed in front before or after the ball passed. If the runner checks-up and then passes in front of the fielder just before the ball reached her, that would be interference, "in my judgment."



__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 04, 2003, 10:24am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally posted by refjef40
I need some opinions on this.The old ground ball to second or shortstop with a runner leaving first or second crossing.On the play I just had the runner at first gets in front of the secondbaseman just as the ball is coming and sort of tiptoes and appears to screen her a little and goes by.The ball bounces off the girls glove and everybody is safe.The runner never stopped and only appeared to be avoiding the ball so since I was by myself I let it go.At what point do the rest of you call that interference?

Good comments above.
Plus remember this, "You'll know it when you see it."
mick
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 04, 2003, 01:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 166
For Mike I would say she checked up as you say.I couldn't say she purposly stopped which by the responses is what everybody looks for.So as was said here you will know it when you see it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1