|
|||
I need some opinions on this.The old ground ball to second or shortstop with a runner leaving first or second crossing.On the play I just had the runner at first gets in front of the secondbaseman just as the ball is coming and sort of tiptoes and appears to screen her a little and goes by.The ball bounces off the girls glove and everybody is safe.The runner never stopped and only appeared to be avoiding the ball so since I was by myself I let it go.At what point do the rest of you call that interference?
|
|
|||
The runner is crossing in front of the fielder. If the runner stops, or slows down to put herself in front of the runner I probably have interferance. If the runner is just running to the next base, and doesn't do anything unusal or out of the ordinary, there is no interferance, IMO
__________________
Bob Del-Blue NCAA, ASA, NFHS NIF |
|
|||
Quote:
From the scenario above, I don't quite get whether the runner waited and then crossed in front before or after the ball passed. If the runner checks-up and then passes in front of the fielder just before the ball reached her, that would be interference, "in my judgment."
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
Good comments above. Plus remember this, "You'll know it when you see it." mick |
Bookmarks |
|
|