Speaking of drinks being what they should be, what's with Appletini, Chocolatini, Strawberrytini, etc....

What, exactly, is it, that you think beer should taste like? Using different methods, ingredients, flavors is historically a part of brewing. If it weren't, there would be only one type of beer. No porters, stouts, pale ales, wheat beers, dortmunders, marzens, lagers, pilsners...etc. Belgian trappists have used fruit in their brewing for centuries (lambics.)

Smoking the malt to roast it has been around for a while, as well. I am sure that there are some really bad smoked beers, as there are really bad all types of beer. However, there are also some really good examples of the style. One of Alaskan Brewing's more successful offerings is a seasonal smoked porter. Tasty, but rich.

My point is diversity in brewing is an age old tradition, not some Johnny come lately scheme to play into the hands of wealthy metrosexual bar rats looking for the next big thing. Do some modern day brewers use tradition methods for that reason? No doubt. But all in all, diversity of flavor and style are long a part of the tradition, and one that I embrace.

Don't mind hoppy, but not overly hoppy. Should be clean. Even a good stout or porter will not leave an aftertaste. What it shouldn't taste like ditto fluid. Don't mind tart, but not something that is going to make you pucker. It should be smooth, not biting. It should not taste like hard liquor. If I wanted bourbon, I would buy bourbon. Any additional "flavoring" like chocolate or coffee, should just be a trace, not something that stands out beyond the beverage itself.

I smoke meats, nuts, fish, etc., but this tasted like someone threw a bucket of ashes in the vat. "Smoked" anything should be a flavoring to compliment the taste of the item, not the predominent taste.

I have no problem with people trying different things, but I have been to places where if I wanted a beer, there were no option than their brews and they all were made with a wine drinking crowd in mind.

Tell me how that works? How can you have an American India Pale Ale?

Why can't these folks just get over themselves.? There is no such thing as a true IPA in this century.

Okay, someone "found" an old IPA recipe, but that recipe was based on long-term process that no longer exists. So why not jsut call it whatever it is based on an IPA recipe. The folks who do this marketing probably do the FP/SP bat thing we constantly hear about from the players. :D

Well, I'm thirsty.

(source: Beer Styles - BeerAdvocate)

Personally, I prefer English Bitter style or American Pale Ale style rather than A-IPA, but I'd tried some Two Hearted Ale and it was quite good, so I thought I'd see what all the hub-bub was about with Surly. The choice of hops can give an ale a citrus flavor, but the Surly Furious was overpowering with the citrus, like they had actually added lime to the brew. But, then, the A-IPA is not my favorite style anyway.

Quote:

American IPA

This is my point. Why call it an IPA if it is not. The English IPA is more buyable since it was the English who brewed the IPA.

And I'm familiar with Dogfish since they are from this area and the sponsor brewer of a local entertainment venue. However, not all of their product is, to my taste, that palatable. Also, familiar with SN & Stone. Not bad, but not something I would go out of my way to get.

Reported. Wish me luck.

Well, why call the lead runner R1 instead of R# where #=the base the runner occupies? I didn't invent beer nomenclature any more than I invented softball nomenclature.

However, "ale" describes how it is brewed; "pale" means not dark; "American" means American hops. There are all kinds of ales, and tagging an ale as "India Pale" references the high hoppiness and pale color (pale compared with, say, Guinness) of the original... it is a style, not an exact formula.

For example, an American Pale Ale is less hoppy than an American India Pale Ale, which is in turn less hoppy than an American Double IPA (also called an Imperial IPA).

Anyway, of the beers I listed, I've only tried the Two Hearted... the examples of the style came from BeerAdvocate.com (where they have more examples listed, including the Surly Furious). I may try the Stone IPA sometime, since it is distributed here.

Because R1 is the first runner? 1 = first :cool:

[quote] I didn't invent beer nomenclature any more than I invented softball nomenclature.[/quo te]

Never said you did. I have been talking about people marketing a product

IPA = special :confused: sorta like Michelob Ultra which neither are.

I disagree with your "india" note. The I in IPA specifically indicated the destination, nothing else.

Actually, I keep very few notes on microbreweries I visit, though I haven't found many which I dislike and that is because real microbreweries are one-horse businesses that live and die with the product. Also, I have found very few microbreweries that do not have some really good food.

Hmmmmm.....think I'm going to dinner. :D

In the 19th century, sure. Now, it merely indicates a style.

And what type of series does the MLB play? :D

Best 4 out of 7? :D

Took you long enough! ;)

Hey, we were talking beer!