![]() |
|
|||
One incident in game tonight which maybe coverage was not executed properly.
R1 on 3B, R2 on 2B, two outs, B5 at the plate. She sends a ground ball to SS, playing back somewhat. R1 leaves with pitch and is streaking for HP, BR, on her way to 1B. As PU, I move up 3rd base line slightly, watch BR for lane and see R1 coming rapidly to HP. Watch for touch at HP. When I look back for ball, it is badly thrown to 1B and gets by her a short distance. When dust settles, R2 on 3B, BR on 1B and the defensive coach is calling time. Wants an interference call on R2, and wants to talk to BU. They talk, then BU approaches me and wants to know if I saw the interference. I say no. I now know that was wrong answer. I should have said, "No, I did not see the play, was trying to fill other obligations." BU told coach, neither of us saw interference. Coach claims R2 interfered with the throw when passing in front of SS. Naturally she told us it was blown coverage. I realize it was BU's responsibility and call and probably should have ended with BU saying she saw no interference and that she had a good look as she later stated to me. Coach asked her to ask, so she did. My question is, should as PU, I have ignored the other two R's and watched the ball action longer. Blast away and thanks. glen
__________________
glen _______________________________ "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." --Mark Twain. |
Bookmarks |
|
|