The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Softball (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/)
-   -   Catcher's Position (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/80128-catchers-position.html)

IRISHMAFIA Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:06pm

Catcher's Position
 
ASA Men's SP

1 out, 3-2 count on RH batter, R1 on 2B. As the pitcher begins his delivery, the catcher steps into the LH batter's box hoping to short hop the pitch in case the runner attempts a steal.

The batter noticed the catcher as the pitch passed through the strike zone and just behind the plate and R1 takes off for 3B.

Your call/thoughts?

BretMan Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:30pm

My thought is...it looks like there is a hole in the rule book!

If this is a violation 6-6-A, there doesn't seem to be any penalty associated with it. Editorial gaffe?

UmpireErnie Tue Sep 06, 2011 04:05am

Bret, your right 6-6-A has no penalty associated with it, however, 6-6-A basically duplicates 6-4-A which states that F1 shall not release a pitch until all defensive players are positioned in fair territory except that F2 must be in the catcher's box. 6-4-A does have a rule book penalty, it is an illegal pitch.

If the batter swings or otherwise makes contact with the illegal pitch, what you see is what you get. Otherwise, ball to the batter. (Remember we are talking about slow pitch here.)

My guess is that 6-6-A has no penalty because the infraction is really on the pitcher for releasing the pitch after F2 steps out of the catcher's box. IPs are charged to the pitcher, not the catcher.

The next thing I can see happening in this play is catchers obstruction when the batter tries to swing at the illegal pitch and the bat makes contact with F2 who is standing in the opposite batters box as the pitch arrives. Not smart.

BretMan Tue Sep 06, 2011 06:05am

I suppose the next issue might be that the catcher moving into the LH batter's box could be considered as "a position in the batter's line of vision" (6-4-B). Then you would have to eject him!

By the way, this is also an illegal pitch, even though it is not a violation by the pitcher. So that kind of conflicts with your logic of why no penalty is associated with 6-6-B. A "non-pitcher" could violate 6-6-A or B.

NCASAUmp Tue Sep 06, 2011 06:15am

Illegal pitch (6-4-A), catcher's obstruction unlikely since ball was already through the strike zone, ball 4 (7-5-E), the ball remains live (8-1-C-1).

GoRedSox Tue Sep 06, 2011 09:03am

What rule set are you guys using? ASA the rule is 6-5-A/B. Please remember to note what rule set you are using.

NCASAUmp Tue Sep 06, 2011 09:09am

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoRedSox (Post 785935)
What rule set are you guys using? ASA the rule is 6-5-A/B. Please remember to note what rule set you are using.

Irish already identified the ruleset in the OP: ASA slow pitch (designated "SP" for short).

If you're talking about fast pitch or modified pitch, yes.

Slow pitch is 6-4-A.

GoRedSox Tue Sep 06, 2011 09:50am

NCASA
Thanks, since we were talking about stealing I assume it was about fast pitch.

NCASAUmp Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:04am

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoRedSox (Post 785944)
NCASA
Thanks, since we were talking about stealing I assume it was about fast pitch.

Not a problem. Welcome to the board!

MNBlue Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:05am

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoRedSox (Post 785944)
NCASA
Thanks, since we were talking about stealing I assume it was about fast pitch.

I don't know when it happened :confused:, but at some point someone decided that game of slow pitch needed stealing added :eek:.

Go figure?

:p ;) :D

NCASAUmp Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:54am

Quote:

Originally Posted by MNBlue (Post 785947)
I don't know when it happened :confused:, but at some point someone decided that game of slow pitch needed stealing added :eek:.

Go figure?

:p ;) :D

I like it when I'm behind the plate. They no longer stick Bubba back there to catch, and instead put someone who keeps the ball away from my shins.

MD Longhorn Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:58am

Technically, unless there is a rule supplement to fill this hole, we don't have an IP - but we do have an ejection. Judgement would be tough, though, to come up with exactly the situation described. With the catcher up and moving forward, right into the umpire's line of sight, it seems we'd most likely have ball four here.

IRISHMAFIA Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:36pm

There is a missing penalty for this rule (6SP.6.A).

This should be corrected this year.

UmpireErnie Wed Sep 07, 2011 02:22am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BretMan (Post 785920)
I suppose the next issue might be that the catcher moving into the LH batter's box could be considered as "a position in the batter's line of vision" (6-4-B). Then you would have to eject him!

By the way, this is also an illegal pitch, even though it is not a violation by the pitcher. So that kind of conflicts with your logic of why no penalty is associated with 6-6-B. A "non-pitcher" could violate 6-6-A or B.

OK my brother now this is simply splitting hairs because obviously you and I have the same call here. But just for fun debate... I believe it IS a violation by F1 because it is not illegal for F2 to be out of the catcher's box until F1 releases a pitch. The action which triggers the penalty is F1 releasing the pitch this is why I say the infraction is considered to be on F1 even if it was the fault of another defensive player. In the scorebook, the IP is gonna be charged to F1.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1