The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 27, 2003, 04:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 517
Talking

A couple of observations.

I think umpires could stay out of this arguement if we would refer to "trained" umpires vs "untrained" umpires. I suspect that is what the author meant when he unfortunatly used the words volunteer and paid. (I can't be sure, as I'm a bit too cheap to pay for the online magazine.) Most of us would agree that any umpire needs to be trained and educated, paid or not.

The second point is that I don't think I would question the intellegence of Carl Childress. He is very knowlegable with regard to baseball rules and mechanics. He is a retired educator, and accomplished author. He does not profess to know beans about softball. He has a "crusty" internet personality untill you establish a relationship with him, just as many characters I meet around ball fields do in real life.

Is Carl a baseball snob with regard to the softball game. Yes. Just as some of our posters are softball snobs or maybe ASA snobs. Does that lessen their intelect, value as a person, a cyber-personality or as a poster of information? Heck no. I expect even Mike and I could enjoy doing a game together.

Wha-d-ya-think, Mike?

Roger Greene

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1