![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Assuming that the catcher was throwing to a defender covering 1B and there were no intentional acts of interference on the BRs behalf: A. is going to be nothing regardless of the game and the application of the CO or IP (fp) would depend on where the BR & runners ended up. B. SP - CO cancelled by INT. BR out, runner's return. FP - CO cancelled by INT. However, the IP has no such caveat. Assuming the coach accepts the penalty and not the play, ball is awarded to batter, R1 scores and R2 goes to 3B.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|