The Official Forum
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Softball (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/)
-   -   Missed 1B - double 1B appeal? (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/58617-missed-1b-double-1b-appeal.html)

WestMichiganBlue Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:08pm
Missed 1B - double 1B appeal?
 
Batted ball to F6, B-R dives in to 1B, touching the white bag with his hand, beating the throw.

While still laying on the ground and touching the base, the B-R is tagged by F3 who appeals for a missed base. B-R still has not touched the colored bag, but - OTOH - the appeal has to be made before the B-R returns to the bag.

So is he out - touching the white base is no different than being off the base returning from RF?

Or safe because it is too late to appeal?

WMB

IRISHMAFIA Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:30pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestMichiganBlue (Post 685686)
Batted ball to F6, B-R dives in to 1B, touching the white bag with his hand, beating the throw.

While still laying on the ground and touching the base, the B-R is tagged by F3 who appeals for a missed base. B-R still has not touched the colored bag, but - OTOH - the appeal has to be made before the B-R returns to the bag.

So is he out - touching the white base is no different than being off the base returning from RF?

Or safe because it is too late to appeal?

WMB
What idiot dives into 1B with a double-bag and not avoiding a tag? That alone may be cause to ring him up.

The BR never left the base, so he cannot "return", failed to touch the appropriate base when a play was obviously being executed at 1B and never "passed" the base to allow 8.3.B into consideration.

Granted, the umpire would really have to be on top of this play to see the hand touching the wrong base, but for the scenario offered, I'll honor the appeal.

argodad Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:33pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 685691)
What idiot dives into 1B with a double-bag and not avoiding a tag? That alone may be cause to ring him up.
If we could call outs based on stupidity games would be a lot shorter. :D

Dakota Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:35pm
Wasn't this, or a play very much like it, discussed here a year or so ago? As I recall, the discussion divided on two points:

1) Safe, because you cannot honor an appeal for missing a base that the runner is touching at the time of the appeal, and after the BR reaches 1B (whether missed or not), the base becomes one big bag;

2) Out, because the runner did not "return" to the double base since the runner never left the base.

I think I lean toward #1.

Dakota Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:37pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 685691)
...The BR never left the base, so he cannot "return", failed to touch the appropriate base when a play was obviously being executed at 1B and never "passed" the base to allow 8.3.B into consideration...
Does passage of time matter? In the OP, the appeal appears to have been made nearly immediately. What if the BR has time to stand, dust off, but still has not lost contact with the white bag or touched the orange. At that point, someone throws the ball to F3, who tags the BR voicing the appeal. Still honor the appeal?

CecilOne Fri Jul 16, 2010 01:20pm
Isn't the concept of "passed a base" a way of saying the runner does not have to touch the base as long as s/he covers the distance to the base and at some point is in the air space of the base?

Is "passed a base" synonymous with "reached a base"?

If those are true, does it matter whether the hand or foot is on the top of the base ("passed" the leading edge) or just touching the side of the base?

The wording of returning to a base possibly is because, like a lot of other rules, based on a specific visualization or case; with the principle applying more broadly.

So, if the returning to a base principle really means having contact with the base after "passing/reaching"; then we should consider that the OP runner is safe from appeal. Also, we have to look at rules that were written before double bags were added in that light, IOW what did it mean when we only had a single bag.

IRISHMAFIA Fri Jul 16, 2010 01:40pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne (Post 685706)
Isn't the concept of "passed a base" a way of saying the runner does not have to touch the base as long as s/he covers the distance to the base and at some point is in the air space of the base?

Is "passed a base" synonymous with "reached a base"?

If those are true, does it matter whether the hand or foot is on the top of the base ("passed" the leading edge) or just touching the side of the base?

The wording of returning to a base possibly is because, like a lot of other rules, based on a specific visualization or case; with the principle applying more broadly.

So, if the returning to a base principle really means having contact with the base after "passing/reaching"; then we should consider that the OP runner is safe from appeal. Also, we have to look at rules that were written before double bags were added in that light, IOW what did it mean when we only had a single bag.
No, to all of the above. It specifically states "passes", not reached, not attained, not do cartwheels to. The context of the sentence is for consideration as the various rules apply to the runner touching bases in legal order, base awards and the scoring of runs.

Argue if you must, but you will lose the protest if you apply it in any contradictory manner.

IRISHMAFIA Fri Jul 16, 2010 01:41pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota (Post 685694)
Does passage of time matter? In the OP, the appeal appears to have been made nearly immediately. What if the BR has time to stand, dust off, but still has not lost contact with the white bag or touched the orange. At that point, someone throws the ball to F3, who tags the BR voicing the appeal. Still honor the appeal?
That is another scenario which has no bearing on my original response.

Tex Fri Jul 16, 2010 01:51pm
Safe, can't call a runner out for missing the base they are standing on.

Dakota Fri Jul 16, 2010 01:59pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 685711)
That is another scenario which has no bearing on my original response.
I know, hence, my question.

CecilOne Fri Jul 16, 2010 02:27pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 685710)
No, to all of the above. It specifically states "passes", not reached, not attained, not do cartwheels to. The context of the sentence is for consideration as the various rules apply to the runner touching bases in legal order, base awards and the scoring of runs.

Argue if you must, but you will lose the protest if you apply it in any contradictory manner.
Thank you. :)

BretMan Fri Jul 16, 2010 08:54pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex (Post 685712)
Safe, can't call a runner out for missing the base they are standing on.
By saying "safe", aren't you now making it legal for a batter-runner to run directly to the white base on every initial play at first? That seems a contradiction of the rule and counerproductive to the intent of the double first base.

I would have an out on this play.

IRISHMAFIA Sat Jul 17, 2010 12:26am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex (Post 685712)
Safe, can't call a runner out for missing the base they are standing on.
Reading just a little bit into the scenario"

Dakota Sat Jul 17, 2010 09:26am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota (Post 685694)
Does passage of time matter? In the OP, the appeal appears to have been made nearly immediately. What if the BR has time to stand, dust off, but still has not lost contact with the white bag or touched the orange. At that point, someone throws the ball to F3, who tags the BR voicing the appeal. Still honor the appeal?
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 685711)
That is another scenario which has no bearing on my original response.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota (Post 685714)
I know, hence, my question.
Hello... well, does it?

IRISHMAFIA Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:11am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota (Post 685774)
Hello... well, does it?
And I thought I didn't have a life :(

It could. It depends on what you are talking about. You changed the scenario to the ball being in someone else's hands.

In SP, the PU should have declared "time" if there is no immediate action by the defense to make an appeal. Once the ball is dead and the runner is standing on the base, no appeal is available.

In FP, where you people insist on have a "live ball" game (which it really isn't), the appeal would have to be in a expeditious manner or I'm moving on with the game.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12am.
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1