The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 25, 2010, 11:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Where the hell did "intent" come from in this situation? Intent is NOT part of the rule.

Either the batter entered the BB or not with an altered or non-approved bat.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 26, 2010, 02:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 653
Send a message via AIM to argodad
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Where the hell did "intent" come from in this situation? Intent is NOT part of the rule.

Either the batter entered the BB or not with an altered or non-approved bat.
Thanks Mike. I really thought I missed something!
__________________
Larry
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 26, 2010, 10:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fremont, NH
Posts: 1,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Where the hell did "intent" come from in this situation? Intent is NOT part of the rule.

Either the batter entered the BB or not with an altered or non-approved bat.
From a couple of posts back. My point is that we're not there to interpret a batter's intent when he approaches the BB w/ an altered/NA bat. If you see it before he steps in, remove the bat from the game.

If he steps into the BB, or manages to get on base, even on a base on balls, and someone points out the bat, he's gone.

I think we're in violent agreement.
__________________
Ted
USA & NFHS Softball
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 26, 2010, 10:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tru_in_Blu View Post
From a couple of posts back. My point is that we're not there to interpret a batter's intent when he approaches the BB w/ an altered/NA bat. If you see it before he steps in, remove the bat from the game.

If he steps into the BB, or manages to get on base, even on a base on balls, and someone points out the bat, he's gone.

I think we're in violent agreement.
My apologies for not properly citing the original post which introduced the thought:

Quote:
The bottom line here is "intent." What does the batter "intend" to do with the bat? - USE IT. That's good enough for me.
IOW, I wasn't responding to you, Tru.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2010 Fed Baseball johnnyg08 Baseball 46 Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:14pm
2010 Fed rules changes UMP 64 Softball 3 Tue Dec 29, 2009 08:26am
2009 - 2010 Interp bob jenkins Basketball 10 Fri Oct 30, 2009 07:36pm
NFHS Rules Changes 2010 Tim C Lacrosse 0 Fri Sep 18, 2009 09:54am
2009-2010 rule changes Mark Padgett Basketball 135 Wed May 06, 2009 06:59am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1