![]() |
|
|||
|
NCAA rule changes for 2009
Just read them over. I find this one curious.
18. 14.2.25 Run Batted In. Credit given to a batter…a ground out, remove(a double play), a fielder’s choice, … Rationale: The defense is more than happy to trade two outs for a run. This means the batter did not earn the RBI. Who got themselves worked up enough about this to demand a rule change? In a tight game 0-0 runners on 1st and 3rd, batter hits the ball to the right side as instructed and intended and drives in the winning run but ends up in a 4-6-3 double play. Defense is happy with the result?? So losing the game is a defensive goal now?? |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2009-2010 NCAA Rule Changes (Possibly) | JBleach85 | Basketball | 6 | Fri May 08, 2009 02:32am |
| 2009 NCAA-M Tournament Officials (2nd/4th day) | Raymond | Basketball | 4 | Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:19pm |
| 2009 NCAA-M Tournament Officials (1st/3rd day) | Raymond | Basketball | 2 | Sun Mar 22, 2009 09:32am |
| 2009 NCAA Rulebook and Casebook | dahoopref | Basketball | 4 | Sun Oct 05, 2008 08:56am |
| NCAA 2009 Rule Changes | Skahtboi | Softball | 30 | Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:34pm |