The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 07, 2009, 02:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 38
Ngb

I've heard referenced several times that ASA is the National Governing Body of Softball. This is all a little tongue in cheek, but I am curious

Couldn't the NCAA make that same claim? Don't they set rules (not adopt from ASA) Determine National Champions and doesn't performance in NCAA softball have a bigger impact on placement on US National teams than performance in ASA? (i.e. if Jenny Finch grew up east coast and played PONY would they have passed on her for the olympic team for failure to play ASA?)

Even if historically at some point ASA was clearly the NGB, does that ever come up for re-election?

Seems to me the rule changes are flowing NCAA-->NFHS--->ASA not the other way around

USSSA and others adopted NCAA rule changes faster than ASA which would make me tend to believe that other orgs look to NCAA for guidance, not ASA

Last edited by Snocatzdad; Mon Dec 07, 2009 at 02:43pm.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 07, 2009, 03:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 746
You have some valid points, but the decision makers for the national team and what umpires will work those games comes from ASA. At least, that is what I think based on the info I have.

The women's "director" of umpiring for ASA (I know there is no such animal officially but there is unofficially, in my mind at least) was able to get two college umps working the college world series to use ASA mechanics in those college games with a phone call. You tell me who the boss is.. At the kentucky challenge cap, one ump was using the college strike call and that ump changed it during the game to the ASA strike call. Again, who is the NGB?

If working the college world series is your ultimate goal, then that cap is your boss. If you want to work the ultimate in softball, mens or womens, ASA is the boss cap. Of course, the two umps mentioned above decided that ASA was the governing body of softball.

When you go out on a field, know what cap to wear. If the head honchos from ASA are going to be at your game and you know that and you aspire to to do world championships, olympics, etc, you now know what hat to wear.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 07, 2009, 06:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
The NCAA only handles a single, gender-based game of softball. The NCAA also deals solely with "adults" and their rules specifially address what is a very narrow faction of the game of softball.

ASA is the most organized, financially sound, softball-exclusive organization in the country. The ASA addresses all levels as well as each and every aspect of all the games of softball for all ages, genders and divisions. They are also probably the most democratic softball organization in the world.

The NGB is determined by the USOC at the direction of the US Congress as put forth in the Ted Stevens Olympic Amateur Sports Act.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 08, 2009, 08:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronald View Post
You have some valid points, but the decision makers for the national team and what umpires will work those games comes from ASA. At least, that is what I think based on the info I have.

The women's "director" of umpiring for ASA (I know there is no such animal officially but there is unofficially, in my mind at least) was able to get two college umps working the college world series to use ASA mechanics in those college games with a phone call. You tell me who the boss is.. At the kentucky challenge cap, one ump was using the college strike call and that ump changed it during the game to the ASA strike call. Again, who is the NGB?

If working the college world series is your ultimate goal, then that cap is your boss. If you want to work the ultimate in softball, mens or womens, ASA is the boss cap. Of course, the two umps mentioned above decided that ASA was the governing body of softball.

When you go out on a field, know what cap to wear. If the head honchos from ASA are going to be at your game and you know that and you aspire to to do world championships, olympics, etc, you now know what hat to wear.
I must have missed Snocatzdad's reference to umpire mechanics in the OP. I thought he was talking rules.

Please elaborate on your second paragraph. I'd love to hear it.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 08, 2009, 08:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
The NGB is determined by the USOC at the direction of the US Congress as put forth in the Ted Stevens Olympic Amateur Sports Act.
There went the credibility.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 08, 2009, 10:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronald View Post
At the kentucky challenge cap, one ump was using the college strike call and that ump changed it during the game to the ASA strike call. Again, who is the NGB?

What, exactly, is the "college strike call?" I have read many versions of SUIP manual, attended many clinics, and don't believe I have ever heard this referred to. Both say "hammer, 90 degrees or greater." So what, exactly, is the difference that you could notice? I use the same signal in NCAA, NJCAA, NFHS, and ASA....and I have never been dinged for it at any level.
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 08, 2009, 11:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by topper View Post
There went the credibility.
Regardless, the point is the NGB is a designation given by the national Olympic committee. They designate the sport association that they want to be the official body for that sport within that country. In the USA, that authority is delegated to the USOC by the Congress. For softball, the USOC has designated ASA. It's not like little Harry Reid or pompous Nancy Pelosi need to actually be involved, although if they thought there was a vote in it, I'm sure they would be.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 08, 2009, 11:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skahtboi View Post
What, exactly, is the "college strike call?" I have read many versions of SUIP manual, attended many clinics, and don't believe I have ever heard this referred to. Both say "hammer, 90 degrees or greater." So what, exactly, is the difference that you could notice? I use the same signal in NCAA, NJCAA, NFHS, and ASA....and I have never been dinged for it at any level.
Arm's more forward of the body instead of to the side.
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 08, 2009, 12:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp View Post
Arm's more forward of the body instead of to the side.

Maybe that is the way that many do it, but that is not the way it is described on p.271 of the SUIP Manual. In both writing and clinics, it is taught the same, and as I have stated, mine is the same in all sactioning bodies.
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 08, 2009, 12:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skahtboi View Post
Maybe that is the way that many do it, but that is not the way it is described on p.271 of the SUIP Manual. In both writing and clinics, it is taught the same, and as I have stated, mine is the same in all sactioning bodies.

Of course, that being said, the college level does allow a little more individuality with mechanics/signals, within reason.
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 08, 2009, 03:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
Regardless, the point is the NGB is a designation given by the national Olympic committee. They designate the sport association that they want to be the official body for that sport within that country. In the USA, that authority is delegated to the USOC by the Congress. For softball, the USOC has designated ASA. It's not like little Harry Reid or pompous Nancy Pelosi need to actually be involved, although if they thought there was a vote in it, I'm sure they would be.
The Ted Stevens Olympic Amateur Sports Act states: "For any sport which is included on the program of the Olympic Games, the Paralympic Games, or the Pan-American Games,…". The Olympics already have, so if the other two Games drop softball, does ASA's NGB status become null and void?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 08, 2009, 04:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by topper View Post
The Ted Stevens Olympic Amateur Sports Act states: "For any sport which is included on the program of the Olympic Games, the Paralympic Games, or the Pan-American Games,…". The Olympics already have, so if the other two Games drop softball, does ASA's NGB status become null and void?
You have too much time on your hands!
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 08, 2009, 07:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by topper View Post
The Ted Stevens Olympic Amateur Sports Act states: "For any sport which is included on the program of the Olympic Games, the Paralympic Games, or the Pan-American Games,…". The Olympics already have, so if the other two Games drop softball, does ASA's NGB status become null and void?
Not being in the Olympics doesn't mean a team is not an Olympic sport. That is, of course, unless you want to ignore facts that do not support your argument. BTW, obviously you overlooked the fact the the US still participates in the Pan-Am Games.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 08, 2009, 07:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Not being in the Olympics doesn't mean a team is not an Olympic sport. That is, of course, unless you want to ignore facts that do not support your argument.
What exactly is my argument in your opinion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
BTW, obviously you overlooked the fact the the US still participates in the Pan-Am Games.
Obvoiusly you overlooked this part of my post:
Quote:
The Olympics already have, so if the other two Games drop softball, does ASA's NGB status become null and void?
What facts am I ignoring? What does the Act mean by "any sport which is included on the program of the Olympic Games"? Is softball still an Olympic sport even though it's not in the Games? Where can one gain this knowledge?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 09, 2009, 07:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by topper View Post
What exactly is my argument in your opinion?
Not YOUR in particular, but your (generic) argument in general as I've already seen this discussed by folk who believe the Olympics are the Olympics and if you are not on the venue, you are not an Olympic Sport.

Quote:
Obvoiusly you overlooked this part of my post:
You are absolutely correct, I misread the post an missed YOUR point...[/quote]

What facts am I ignoring? What does the Act mean by "any sport which is included on the program of the Olympic Games"? Is softball still an Olympic sport even though it's not in the Games? Where can one gain this knowledge?[/quote]

...but the answer is the same. A sport is an Olympic sport as long as the USOC says it is so and as long as the ISF is supporting the sport internationally, I don't believe it is going to be dropped as there are too many membership countries. Or the USOC, Don P. and Ron R. are just lying to us.

To be honest, I don't know if it is even worth the issue any longer. The Olympics has just been nothing, but a political volleyball for the past three decades or so and, IMO, has lost some of their luster. Then again, I am a cynic.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1