The Official Forum
Page 5 of 5 « First 34 5
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Softball (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/)
-   -   ASA Proposed Rule Changes of Note (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/55321-asa-proposed-rule-changes-note.html)

ChampaignBlue Sat Nov 14, 2009 05:29am
"GMAFB! We have more to worry about issues which directly affect the game. Maybe whe should have NASA scan the skies every half inning to insure a wayward meteor will not fall near a field."

They already do! They're also scanning your field and sending info to the NSA. Will there be a uniform change to allow foil hats?

NCASAUmp Sat Nov 14, 2009 10:32am
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChampaignBlue (Post 636202)
"GMAFB! We have more to worry about issues which directly affect the game. Maybe whe should have NASA scan the skies every half inning to insure a wayward meteor will not fall near a field."

They already do! They're also scanning your field and sending info to the NSA. Will there be a uniform change to allow foil hats?
Official Gear has already got them in stock.

http://sabian.whispers.org/tinfoil-hat-asa.jpg

Dakota Sat Nov 14, 2009 10:53am
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChampaignBlue (Post 636202)
....Will there be a uniform change to allow foil hats?
That's just what they want us to do...

On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Foil Helmets: An Empirical Study (MIT)
Quote:
Conclusion
The helmets amplify frequency bands that coincide with those allocated to the US government between 1.2 Ghz and 1.4 Ghz. According to the FCC, These bands are supposedly reserved for ''radio location'' (ie, GPS), and other communications with satellites (see, for example, [3]). The 2.6 Ghz band coincides with mobile phone technology. Though not affiliated by government, these bands are at the hands of multinational corporations.

It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC. We hope this report will encourage the paranoid community to develop improved helmet designs to avoid falling prey to these shortcomings.

Blind Squirrel Tue Nov 17, 2009 05:27pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem (Post 636089)
So Cal coaches tired of the fact that they no longer dominate 18G.

The other huge driving fact.. the fact that many coaches and parents too simply want 18G to be a showcase division (hence the reason for a big end of year showcase through premier) and not a competitive division.
I am a SoCal parent. Never been a softball ump or a coach.

How does the elimination of college players address the issue in your first statement?

John

wadeintothem Tue Nov 17, 2009 06:54pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp (Post 636209)
Official Gear has already got them in stock.

http://sabian.whispers.org/tinfoil-hat-asa.jpg
I hear they fade rather quickly, so dont wash your tinfoil.

NCASAUmp Thu Nov 19, 2009 08:38pm
Continuous spiral?
 
So the new ASA rules for 2010 have been posted on ASA's website here: http://downloads.asasoftball.com/abo...thcomments.pdf

In it, they talk about allowing an item such as the Grip-N-Rip (pictured here), but also requiring them to be taped. They also mention that the tape must be a continuous spiral. Does this mean that the tape securing the G-n-R must be continuously spiral?

My though is "no," as the G-n-R is a grip in and of itself, and securing it to the bat with tape should be enough. However, I'd like your opinions first.

IRISHMAFIA Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:38pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp (Post 637214)
So the new ASA rules for 2010 have been posted on ASA's website here: http://downloads.asasoftball.com/abo...thcomments.pdf

In it, they talk about allowing an item such as the Grip-N-Rip (pictured here), but also requiring them to be taped. They also mention that the tape must be a continuous spiral. Does this mean that the tape securing the G-n-R must be continuously spiral?

My though is "no," as the G-n-R is a grip in and of itself, and securing it to the bat with tape should be enough. However, I'd like your opinions first.
Actually, it doesn't mention any item other than tape and a finger molding grip. The GNR isn't the only finger molding on the market and not all GNR products are finger molded.

My opinion, for now, is that any attachment should be under the tape, but you never know.

NCASAUmp Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:59pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 637227)
Actually, it doesn't mention any item other than tape and a finger molding grip. The GNR isn't the only finger molding on the market and not all GNR products are finger molded.

My opinion, for now, is that any attachment should be under the tape, but you never know.
I do believe that the rule requires it to be firmly attached with tape. My concern, of course, is that the rule also specifically states that the tape must be continuously spiral. I think that in the case of the Grip-N-Rip pictured in my link, keeping it continuously spiral without completely taking away from the effects of the finger molding might become difficult.

NCASAUmp Wed Feb 24, 2010 05:47pm
Sorry to drag up an old thread, but I was wondering if anyone had any other thoughts regarding requiring a "continuous spiral" over these knobcuffs? I'd promised another person on another forum that I would ask around.

My interpretation is that the tape must be continuously spiral, but can go under the finger-forming/flare/cone grip, so long as the finger-forming/flare/cone grip is also securely taped to the bat (umpire's reasonable judgment) AND that there is no exposed metal in the 10-15" area.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22pm.
Page 5 of 5 « First 34 5
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1