The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Softball (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/)
-   -   NAFA Does Not Last Long In This Area (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/50193-nafa-does-not-last-long-area.html)

whiskers_ump Sat Dec 06, 2008 02:16am

NAFA Does Not Last Long In This Area
 
NAFA has already been replaced in this area. [Texas]

IFA is taking over. NAFA lasted 3/4th of a season locally. Once the Nats
was over, it was replaced.

http://www.ifasoftballcentral.com/:confused:

Glad I only bought two shirts. They were on a two for one sale.

IRISHMAFIA Sat Dec 06, 2008 08:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by whiskers_ump (Post 555879)
NAFA has already been replaced in this area. [Texas]

IFA is taking over. NAFA lasted 3/4th of a season locally. Once the Nats
was over, it was replaced.

http://www.ifasoftballcentral.com/:confused:

Glad I only bought two shirts. They were on a two for one sale.

Can't you Texans make up your mind? And here I thought it was Presidents from Georgia that sat high in the straddle.

AtlUmpSteve Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:18am

Sure they can. Tommy Voss in Beaumont has made up his mind to make money on teams, umpires, and insurance commissions, and NAFA wasn't kicking enough back.

Keep buying shirts, Glen; they haven't run out of letters yet.

Gulf Coast Blue Sat Dec 06, 2008 01:45pm

Politics as usual
 
Sad.........AFA had a pretty good following on the Gulf Coast of Texas and Oklahoma (both ASA strongholds). Many ASA resgistered teams played in the AFA qualifiers here just in case they did not get qualify for the ASA championships.

It was a beneficial symbiotic relationship between the two.

As is usual in the creation of competing organizations.........egos and politics of the individuals at the top get in the way of the big picture.

I have fond memories of the old AFA group. Glen umpired in one of the National tournaments that one of my daughters played in.

Lately it has just come become more diluted..........(which I am sure he will admit).

Joel

Dholloway1962 Sat Dec 06, 2008 07:06pm

Same thing here in Okla. NAFA gone.

They decided to let us wear our high school uniform so we won't have to buy anything new.........YET.

whiskers_ump Sat Dec 06, 2008 08:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dholloway1962 (Post 555959)
Same thing here in Okla. NAFA gone.

They decided to let us wear our high school uniform so we won't have to buy anything new.........YET.

Yes, that is what we were told also. Hope they are not pulling
our chain. I am running out of closet space. They just want us
to wear an IFA cap. Hmmmm wonder what that will cost?

IRISHMAFIA Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:32am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkbjones (Post 556013)
Hey, I like that idea of each team having to pay one umpire at the plate prior to the game. But...what if you are working three man? does the PU have to bring change to the meeting in his ball bag so they can get the odd man paid? Or...do you do a double flip, in which the losing BU has to work a freebie?:eek:

They instituted this method in the local leagues a few years back and it absolutely killed the local association. I don't like be paid on the field for a couple of reasons.

One reason is convenient store clerks get killed for less than $50 and a pack of cigarettes and a lot of the local parks are not well lit and security is non-existant.

Also, there is no incentive for an umpire to come to assn. meetings. And before you say, "well, just fine them", that would be awfully hard since there is no money in escrow (game fees due) from which to draw the fine. And before you say, "then just don't schedule them", and how do you suggest the assn. fulfill it's contract to provide umpires to the local leagues? Even if you could, already strapped associations are not looking to drive umpires away, but retain them and that isn't going to help if you start your season with a statement, "you need to pay us $xxx.xx before you can get a clinic or game".

Tournaments are no big deal, but for the sake of the local associations, I pay out tournament fees at their meetings and those who don't show, do not get paid until after the last association meeting. Not saying it helps that much, but it is my responsibility to aid the local associations in whatever manner I can.

wadeintothem Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:58am

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 556037)
They instituted this method in the local leagues a few years back and it absolutely killed the local association. I don't like be paid on the field for a couple of reasons.

One reason is convenient store clerks get killed for less than $50 and a pack of cigarettes and a lot of the local parks are not well lit and security is non-existant.

Also, there is no incentive for an umpire to come to assn. meetings. And before you say, "well, just fine them", that would be awfully hard since there is no money in escrow (game fees due) from which to draw the fine. And before you say, "then just don't schedule them", and how do you suggest the assn. fulfill it's contract to provide umpires to the local leagues? Even if you could, already strapped associations are not looking to drive umpires away, but retain them and that isn't going to help if you start your season with a statement, "you need to pay us $xxx.xx before you can get a clinic or game".

Tournaments are no big deal, but for the sake of the local associations, I pay out tournament fees at their meetings and those who don't show, do not get paid until after the last association meeting. Not saying it helps that much, but it is my responsibility to aid the local associations in whatever manner I can.


I agree in part and disagree in part.

Ideally, umpires should be paid through the association and not on the field, security of that situation not being a concern IMO. This serves several other important purposes, from chain of command, to the money trail, to making sure the association and assigner gets their due.

Pay should be promptly, within a week or two, provided to the umpire, who is an independent contractor and deserving of pay for work provided in a timely manner.

Appearance at the association meetings can be a factor in deciding to assign, but should not be a factor in paying them once you choose to assign them; IMO.

IRISHMAFIA Sun Dec 07, 2008 02:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by wadeintothem (Post 556040)
Pay should be promptly, within a week or two, provided to the umpire, who is an independent contractor and deserving of pay for work provided in a timely manner.

Well, unfortunately, it isn't always that simple. I tried to make it that simple one year, but the money isn't always that quickly available. In this case, I'm referring to championship play, but it isn't only then. Colleges and high schools will not pay for games until they receive an invoice, process it and having the board issue a check. And occasionally, it can take months before the association receive remuneration for services rendered.

Quote:

Appearance at the association meetings can be a factor in deciding to assign, but should not be a factor in paying them once you choose to assign them; IMO.
Again, it is not always that easy.

whiskers_ump Sun Dec 07, 2008 03:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 556082)
Well, unfortunately, it isn't always that simple. I tried to make it that simple one year, but the money isn't always that quickly available. In this case, I'm referring to championship play, but it isn't only then. Colleges and high schools will not pay for games until they receive an invoice, process it and having the board issue a check. And occasionally, it can take months before the association receive remuneration for services rendered.



Again, it is not always that easy.

The only pay at the plate we have is travel ball. HS and college, check sent to
the umpire that called the game by the school that was home team. Even ASA
tournaments here are pay at the plate.

wadeintothem Sun Dec 07, 2008 03:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by whiskers_ump (Post 556087)
The only pay at the plate we have is travel ball. HS and college, check sent to
the umpire that called the game by the school that was home team. Even ASA
tournaments here are pay at the plate.

That is pretty degrading IMO, and embarrassing.

But i've heard the texas umpire situation discussed a lot over at Heybucket, including this aspect. I think that area could use a little revamping. Part of that overhaul could be a more professional organization and billing system.

wadeintothem Sun Dec 07, 2008 03:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 556082)
Well, unfortunately, it isn't always that simple. I tried to make it that simple one year, but the money isn't always that quickly available. In this case, I'm referring to championship play, but it isn't only then. Colleges and high schools will not pay for games until they receive an invoice, process it and having the board issue a check. And occasionally, it can take months before the association receive remuneration for services rendered.



Again, it is not always that easy.

I would not put issues involving billing/red tape in the same category as intentionally withholding a private contractors pay until they attend a meeting.


I know one college assigner around here who pays once a year. Period. So thats it. If you choose to work for him, you do so knowing that.

That would hold true with your group as well, if you dont like it, dont work for your org.


I just dont agree with it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 556082)

Again, it is not always that easy.

That is an organizational problem, not a problem for those who are doing the work.

Steve M Sun Dec 07, 2008 07:56pm

All of the high schools in this part of Pa pay at the game, via check.
Most of the colleges I see pay at the game, 'tho there are some that it takes up to 5-6 weeks. Travel reimbursement does come once a year - at the end of the season.
Summer league play - and this includes some legion & adult wood bat BB - pay at the game. And this is almost always by check.
The ISC group I work with generally pays within 3 weeks - by check.
Tournaments have always paid by the end of the last day - with the note (not exception) that some pay at the end of each day.

Maybe I've gotten spoiled by this - in looking at how some areas are paid, I kinda think I have been spoiled. Most of the games I do are not for the local district - wonder why - so Mike's area's way of paying would not impact me. I do like the idea of having some way of, not forcing but "encouraging" local meeting attendance.

wadeintothem Sun Dec 07, 2008 08:01pm

A few questions..

If its pay at the game, how does the umpire organization get paid? Is it separate billing?

How is it accounted for with a 1099 or is it?

I wish it was all cash under the table for a game, but its just not in my area. Those days are gone. HS and travel ball tournaments go through an association, with everyone getting their kick and its all by contract. This is not a handshake type deal.

It seems very different in other areas.

Steve M Sun Dec 07, 2008 08:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by wadeintothem (Post 556135)
A few questions..

If its pay at the game, how does the umpire organization get paid? Is it separate billing?

How is it accounted for with a 1099 or is it?

I wish it was all cash under the table for a game, but its just not in my area. Those days are gone. HS and travel ball tournaments go through an association, with everyone getting their kick and its all by contract. This is not a handshake type deal.

It seems very different in other areas.

The umpire organization does not get paid - we're independant contractors.
As for 1099's, most of the high schools and all of the colleges have W-9's, but I don't usually get to $600 in a quater for any of them. I'm in a very rural area - huge ASA district, for example, but primarily farm land which does not make for a big number population-wise.

Yeah, every area seems to be different. Like you said - if you don't like the way it's done, work elsewhere. The vast majority of the games I do are outside of my area - but that's because I like higher level games.

wadeintothem Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:12pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve M (Post 556141)
The umpire organization does not get paid - we're independant contractors.
As for 1099's, most of the high schools and all of the colleges have W-9's, but I don't usually get to $600 in a quater for any of them. I'm in a very rural area - huge ASA district, for example, but primarily farm land which does not make for a big number population-wise.

Yeah, every area seems to be different. Like you said - if you don't like the way it's done, work elsewhere. The vast majority of the games I do are outside of my area - but that's because I like higher level games.

Interesting. I am also rurual, but I travel to work the big events within my own metro.

Here, it works like this

Several tournament hosting organizations have contracted with the umpire organization to provide officials for tournaments. The tournaments are pretty much weekly through the season (mar-nov) and some huge. Each weekend 30-80 umpires are dispatched to these tournaments. This does not include any national / regional championship play events.

Likewise on the NFHS side, every high school I know of goes through our organization to provide officials for most of their games of just every sport. As such, it would be very easy for me to say, transition to football or baseball, because it is the same organization; albeit different leadership. I know the peeps, and easy to get in if I chose.

The exceptions for ASA are: Rec leagues & beer leagues and some small friendlies that do not include outside teams. The exceptions for high school usually involve JV programs. I am a local UIC under my association and I have some rec leagues and beer leagues under me where the organization gets nothing (and neither do I). There are 9 or 10 other similar areas, only one of whom goes through the org for their rec league. These all have various methods of payment, which do not include the umpire organization.

There are also strong ties to the NCAA community, with our regional UIC also a top dog in NCAA, so were one capable and able, it is an easy transition to make in roads to the NCAA, from there your career is in your hands.


So this is an extensive network of officiating and tournament hosting organizations with significant and continuous training and evaluation of umpires.

It sounds a little different than your area; I'm not sure how you could coordinate weekly events involving dozens of umpires at multiple sites without a central command.. so I'm not sure how active it is in your area.

For pay, we get paid weekly from our assocation, just like a job. At the end of the year, those who made over a certain amount get a 1099. I'm not sure what that amount is because I've certainly always well exceeded whatever minimum that is and I'm not involved in that aspect. Also for every umpire dispatched to an event, the org receives payment which is disbursed, for example ot the assigner, etc. The association is run a board (of which I am a insignificant member) who who meet monthly and decide all things wondrous, or in the alternative, whine ad nauseum.

Thats about how it goes here.

CajunNewBlue Mon Dec 08, 2008 09:03am

Quote:

Originally Posted by whiskers_ump (Post 555879)
NAFA has already been replaced in this area. [Texas]

IFA is taking over. NAFA lasted 3/4th of a season locally. Once the Nats
was over, it was replaced.

http://www.ifasoftballcentral.com/:confused:

Glad I only bought two shirts. They were on a two for one sale.

WTF? ohhh great. :rolleyes:

Whomever the heck takes over, I hope they up the umpire fee's... last years was a tad low. IMHO

topper Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:02am

Quote:

Originally Posted by wadeintothem (Post 556092)
That is pretty degrading IMO, and embarrassing.

But i've heard the texas umpire situation discussed a lot over at Heybucket, including this aspect. I think that area could use a little revamping. Part of that overhaul could be a more professional organization and billing system.

I seriously doubt that the officials; you know, the ones out on the field working, feel degraded or embarrassed by accepting their pay up front, on the field. There are several tournaments every weekend in this area. Each one with it's own assignor/UIC. What compensation for his/her duties that person negotiates with the tournament hosts is his/her concern. As Steve M said, we are independant contractors and like it that way. Please keep your "big government" approach and any revamping to yourself. :)

whiskers_ump Mon Dec 08, 2008 01:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by topper (Post 556267)
I seriously doubt that the officials; you know, the ones out on the field working, feel degraded or embarrassed by accepting their pay up front, on the field. There are several tournaments every weekend in this area. Each one with it's own assignor/UIC. What compensation for his/her duties that person negotiates with the tournament hosts is his/her concern. As Steve M said, we are independant contractors and like it that way. Please keep your "big government" approach and any revamping to yourself. :)

Hear Ye Hear Ye...Thank you Topper.

IRISHMAFIA Mon Dec 08, 2008 02:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by topper (Post 556267)
I seriously doubt that the officials; you know, the ones out on the field working, feel degraded or embarrassed by accepting their pay up front, on the field. There are several tournaments every weekend in this area. Each one with it's own assignor/UIC. What compensation for his/her duties that person negotiates with the tournament hosts is his/her concern. As Steve M said, we are independant contractors and like it that way. Please keep your "big government" approach and any revamping to yourself. :)

Well, obviously, it all depends on where you are standing as to whether this is true or not, or if such an operating format would succeed or not.

BTW, who is talking about big government?

Texasbock Mon Dec 08, 2008 02:56pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve (Post 555901)
Sure they can. Tommy Voss in Beaumont has made up his mind to make money on teams, umpires, and insurance commissions, and NAFA wasn't kicking enough back.

Keep buying shirts, Glen; they haven't run out of letters yet.

I'm not disagreeing with what you are saying necessarily. I would though like to know what Mr. Voss's side of the argument is.

A few comments about some of the other posts in this thread:

I worked the Sulphur National tournament this year and thought the fees were more than adequate. I would prefer the status quo in my neck of the woods. (SE Houston). Things are just fine pay wise and we sure as heck don't need an "organization" or a "system" to fix things. If it isn't broke, why does someone feel a need to fix it?

My main beef is with TASO (TX high school ball) where it takes forever to get a check. They get away with it because they are an "organized" "system" that could give a rip about how much softball umpire fees are and has been at the same rate structure for a long time.

Skahtboi Mon Dec 08, 2008 03:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texasbock (Post 556417)
My main beef is with TASO (TX high school ball) where it takes forever to get a check. They get away with it because they are an "organized" "system" that could give a rip about how much softball umpire fees are and has been at the same rate structure for a long time.

First of all, TASO has nothing to do with your getting a check. That is between you and the institution (school) you worked for. TASO also has nothing to do with the rate structure of officials' fees in Texas. TASO is merely your voice to the UIL, rather than a few thousand people trying to petition the UIL altogether. TASO is an organization that makes sure you have the materials to officiate with, to help set officiating standards (such as uniform policies), and to make sure you are adequately insured while officiating, or on the way to or from an event. That is the purpose of TASO.

UIL, on the other hand, does set the fees that you will be paid, including maximums that institutions can pay for officials' services. They are also the authors of 1204, the much debated article of this year. The UIL has mandated for ages (as long as I can remember, and that is quite a while) that schools have a check in your hands within 45 days of the date of service, and encourages the schools to pay even sooner than that. (From my understanding, the 45 day period was decided on because many school disctricts, especially the 1 and 2 A ones, frequently cut checks just once a month.) If you an institution fails to pay you in that time frame, you need to immediately report said institution to the UIL in writing. (A quick phone call doesn't hurt either.)

As for the rate structure in Texas for softball umpires, seven years ago it set at $30.00 a game. About three, maybe four years ago, it was upped to $35.00 a game. This year it has been raised to $40.00 a game. I don't know about you, but two raises in a seven year period doesn't constitute as being "the same rate structure for a long time," in my book.

If you have issues that need to be addressed with the UIL, then I strongly encourage you to contact the president of your local chapter, or your district director. If that doesn't work, I have always found the people at TASO extremely easy to contact and to work with. However, I do recommend following the chain of command.

wadeintothem Mon Dec 08, 2008 08:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by topper (Post 556267)
I seriously doubt that the officials; you know, the ones out on the field working, feel degraded or embarrassed by accepting their pay up front, on the field. There are several tournaments every weekend in this area. Each one with it's own assignor/UIC. What compensation for his/her duties that person negotiates with the tournament hosts is his/her concern. As Steve M said, we are independant contractors and like it that way. Please keep your "big government" approach and any revamping to yourself. :)

It's definitely a different approach than I am accustomed to. Better? I'm not sure, but I'll let it rest as it is. No purpose would be served by debating it IMO.

topper Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by wadeintothem (Post 556517)
It's definitely a different approach than I am accustomed to. Better? I'm not sure, but I'll let it rest as it is. No purpose would be served by debating it IMO.

Understand that our "approach" evolved (or devolved if you like) IMO due to the lack of a viable local or regional association. Once credability and trust are lost, it's difficult to regain them. Even when it comes to Skahtboi's precious TASO. We have been dealing with this situation so long here that change would be difficult to affect.

bkbjones Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:39am

We can "get a draw any time," which is not true and to me is demeaning. Some of the money goes for "overhead," which we really don't have for ASA FP games. Well, I take that back. We pay an assignor who doesn't assign ASA FP tournament games. The only overhead is the eventual generation of a 1099 and the postage to send a check -- both of which are an effort of time, money and effort.

We get demeaned if we want to buy more than a case of water and a bunch of bananas for a territorial or national tournament, much less a weekend. Never mind that we are several, multiple, thousands of dollars in the black. (We're in better shape than the Big 3 auto makers.)

We have to ask for a draw which "can be done weekly." Yep. Sure can. Of course then you get put down for asking for a draw -- for our OWN money that WE have earned. Heaven forbid we should ever ever ever go to a cash system, or even allow some extremely trustworthy individual such as SRW to be able to get enough cash outta the bank to pay umpires.

CajunNewBlue Tue Dec 09, 2008 08:49am

We get paid by check as we leave the game, every game. glad I work where I work... fuq waiting on my money, I earned it. :D
And I try as I might I am never embarrassed or demeaned getting my $25 or $30 bucks in cash from a coach at the plate meeting during the travel ball season... maybe my standards are too low?.... but then again I hang out with you guys!! ;)

wadeintothem Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by topper (Post 556564)
Understand that our "approach" evolved (or devolved if you like) IMO due to the lack of a viable local or regional association. Once credability and trust are lost, it's difficult to regain them. Even when it comes to Skahtboi's precious TASO. We have been dealing with this situation so long here that change would be difficult to affect.


Actually, on the other site, the Texas umpire situation is compained about quite a bit. If you read the Texas board, umpires are quite the topic. Those are your client's and they are apprarently not happy. So whatever situation is going on in Texas, it is being reflected in how your clients are perceiving you. I hope you guys are able to work out these issues.

wadeintothem Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:44am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkbjones (Post 556575)
We get demeaned if we want to buy more than a case of water and a bunch of bananas for a territorial or national tournament, much less a weekend. Never mind that we are several, multiple, thousands of dollars in the black. (We're in better shape than the Big 3 auto makers.)

We have to ask for a draw which "can be done weekly." Yep. Sure can. Of course then you get put down for asking for a draw -- for our OWN money that WE have earned. Heaven forbid we should ever ever ever go to a cash system, or even allow some extremely trustworthy individual such as SRW to be able to get enough cash outta the bank to pay umpires.

Thats a shame.

SRW Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkbjones (Post 556575)
We can "get a draw any time," which is not true and to me is demeaning. Some of the money goes for "overhead," which we really don't have for ASA FP games. Well, I take that back. We pay an assignor who doesn't assign ASA FP tournament games. The only overhead is the eventual generation of a 1099 and the postage to send a check -- both of which are an effort of time, money and effort.

We get demeaned if we want to buy more than a case of water and a bunch of bananas for a territorial or national tournament, much less a weekend. Never mind that we are several, multiple, thousands of dollars in the black. (We're in better shape than the Big 3 auto makers.)

We have to ask for a draw which "can be done weekly." Yep. Sure can. Of course then you get put down for asking for a draw -- for our OWN money that WE have earned. Heaven forbid we should ever ever ever go to a cash system, or even allow some extremely trustworthy individual such as SRW to be able to get enough cash outta the bank to pay umpires.

There you go again, telling lies about me. :p

Seriously though, I would admit that our system is quite antiquated. Repeated attempts to improve efficiency and reduce effort have been poo-poo'd. It'll take a strong leader with a complete understanding of the whole picture to fix it... and a board that will back "breaking tradition."

IRISHMAFIA Tue Dec 09, 2008 01:08pm

Personally, I'd rather NOT have the money. Let the association(s) hold it for me and give me a lump sum at the end of the season.

It is an effective manner of saving money without a bank account and it makes it easier to manage the paperwork for tax purposes.

Others may think it is silly, but if it is in my pocket as I make it, it is gone that much quicker and it seems like I'm making next to nothing.

Dakota Tue Dec 09, 2008 01:18pm

Just a guess... you also manage your withholding to get a large refund at tax time? ;)

topper Tue Dec 09, 2008 02:37pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by wadeintothem (Post 556644)
Actually, on the other site, the Texas umpire situation is compained about quite a bit. If you read the Texas board, umpires are quite the topic. Those are your client's and they are apprarently not happy. So whatever situation is going on in Texas, it is being reflected in how your clients are perceiving you. I hope you guys are able to work out these issues.

What other site? Got on the heybucket TX board but didn't find what you're referring to although I'm sure it's there. I'm interested to know what our "clients'" perception of us is.

Interesting that you throw a blanket over the entire state. Texas is pretty big. I can be in Mobile quicker than I can El Paso or Lubbock. You may as well just extend your blanket to cover the entire Gulf Coast.

I probably won't take it personally if people that play 6-8 (or even 2) hrs from here are upset with their umpiring situation.

CecilOne Tue Dec 09, 2008 03:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota (Post 556704)
Just a guess... you also manage your withholding to get a large refund at tax time? ;)

What's a refund? ;)

Skahtboi Tue Dec 09, 2008 05:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by topper (Post 556564)
Even when it comes to Skahtboi's precious TASO.

:confused: WTF :confused:

topper Tue Dec 09, 2008 05:58pm

Quote:

Even when it comes to Skahtboi's precious TASO.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Skahtboi (Post 556794)
:confused: WTF :confused:

No offense was meant. I apologize for the tone, I should have worded it differently. You have been a big defender of TASO on more than one occasion, which I can absolutely respect. I just feel differently about the level of representation they provide their officials.

whiskers_ump Tue Dec 09, 2008 07:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by topper (Post 556740)
What other site? Got on the heybucket TX board but didn't find what you're referring to although I'm sure it's there. I'm interested to know what our "clients'" perception of us is.

Interesting that you throw a blanket over the entire state. Texas is pretty big. I can be in Mobile quicker than I can El Paso or Lubbock. You may as well just extend your blanket to cover the entire Gulf Coast.

I probably won't take it personally if people that play 6-8 (or even 2) hrs from here are upset with their umpiring situation.

Did not see it either.

wadeintothem Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:38am

Quote:

Originally Posted by topper (Post 556740)
What other site? Got on the heybucket TX board but didn't find what you're referring to although I'm sure it's there. I'm interested to know what our "clients'" perception of us is.

Interesting that you throw a blanket over the entire state. Texas is pretty big. I can be in Mobile quicker than I can El Paso or Lubbock. You may as well just extend your blanket to cover the entire Gulf Coast.

I probably won't take it personally if people that play 6-8 (or even 2) hrs from here are upset with their umpiring situation.

Looking through the summer threads, it seems the San Marcos/Austin umps bore the brunt of the ire, so apologies for any implied generalization.

Admittedly, it could be austin area parents are just more whiney. :D

Skahtboi Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:37am

Quote:

Originally Posted by topper (Post 556798)
No offense was meant. I apologize for the tone, I should have worded it differently. You have been a big defender of TASO on more than one occasion, which I can absolutely respect. I just feel differently about the level of representation they provide their officials.

As I have stated before, it is not so much as I am a "big defender" of TASO, as it is until I hear a better alternative then I feel it is what we have to work with, and rather than shoot it down because of some flaws, we should work to fix it or to find something that will work even better. Complaining for the sake of complaining never gets anything accomplished.

In this thread, however, my "defense" of TASO was simply that the blame was being laid at the wrong feet. TASO is not, nor never has been, responsible for getting officials paid in Texas, or for the guidelines that govern their payment. That is strictly the domain of the UIL. I think, oftentimes, that officials in Texas confuse the roles of TASO and the UIL. In many cases they see them as one in the same entity. This just isn't the case.

As we have discussed before, representation begins as the local level.

Also, no offense was taken with your comments, I was just unaware that TASO was my "beloved." :rolleyes::D

bkbjones Wed Dec 10, 2008 01:37pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by wadeintothem (Post 556986)
Looking through the summer threads, it seems the San Marcos/Austin umps bore the brunt of the ire, so apologies for any implied generalization.

Admittedly, it could be austin area parents are just more whiney. :D

Geez, haven't you heard all the B(C)S carping from the Austin area? You'd think they had shut down Blue Bell Creamery or Jaime's Spanish Village or something...

And the San Marcos folks are obviously going through withdrawals since most of their teams haven't been worth a damn since they dropped the "Southwestern" in front of the Texas State University.:eek:

PtotheB Wed Dec 10, 2008 04:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkbjones (Post 557057)
Geez, haven't you heard all the B(C)S carping from the Austin area? You'd think they had shut down Blue Bell Creamery or Jaime's Spanish Village or something...

And the San Marcos folks are obviously going through withdrawals since most of their teams haven't been worth a damn since they dropped the "Southwestern" in front of the Texas State University.:eek:

Austin whiney? Just look at the election results. Austin and El Paso are the only metro areas in TX that are blue, ergo, they are also the areas to whine the most. It's just the way it is. My observation has always been that the older the kids, the less complaining you hear. That's either because by the time that their DD's are 14 they know the rules or are just numb to bad calls.

Dholloway1962 Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by PtotheB (Post 557128)
Austin whiney?

Plenty of Austin whiney going on right now.

BOOMER SOONER

whiskers_ump Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:12pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by dholloway1962 (Post 557186)
plenty of austin whiney going on right now.

boomer sooner


texas 45 okla 35

Dholloway1962 Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by whiskers_ump (Post 557198)
texas 45 okla 35

Texas Tech 39 Texas 33
Oklahoma 65 Texas Tech 21
Texas 28 Okla State 24 (at Texas)
Oklahoma 61 Okla State 41 (at OSU)
I could go on and on but nuff said except:

OU SOONERS BIG 12 Champions.
OU SOONERS vs. FLORIDA in BCS Championship

BOOMER SOONER

:D

IRISHMAFIA Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:36pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dholloway1962 (Post 557202)
Texas Tech 39 Texas 33
Oklahoma 65 Texas Tech 21
Texas 28 Okla State 24 (at Texas)
Oklahoma 61 Okla State 41 (at OSU)
I could go on and on but nuff said except:

OU SOONERS BIG 12 Champions.
OU SOONERS vs. FLORIDA in BCS Championship

BOOMER SOONER

:D

And if you are lucky, maybe someday your school will have the opportunity to play for the NCAA Div I Football Championship.:)

outathm Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:44pm

Well said Irish

azbigdawg Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by whiskers_ump (Post 557198)
texas 45 okla 35



He forgot that "Minor" Issue:rolleyes:

Skahtboi Thu Dec 11, 2008 09:27am

Seems I have completely lost this thread. :confused: I guess it is safe for me to assume that it has taken on some sort of a football related theme now! :rolleyes:

PtotheB Thu Dec 11, 2008 09:39am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skahtboi (Post 557286)
Seems I have completely lost this thread. :confused: I guess it is safe for me to assume that it has taken on some sort of a football related theme now! :rolleyes:

Does that mean we get to blame it on TASO? :p

whiskers_ump Thu Dec 11, 2008 09:51am

Quote:

Originally Posted by PtotheB (Post 557292)
Does that mean we get to blame it on TASO? :p


Nay, blame
Texas Tech, they were the only ones that could beat TEXAS

Dakota Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:21am

Having lived for 8+ years in Austin, I'm loving the "injustice" of it all!

UT fans are insufferable, so good to see them suffer!

One play against a school all the UT "former students" have always thought was barely a college, let alone one on the same level as the mighty UT, has cost them a shot at the Championship. Priceless!

Welpe Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:53am

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 557204)
And if you are lucky, maybe someday your school will have the opportunity to play for the NCAA Div I Football Championship.:)

Go Rice Owls. :D

I didn't realize how many Texans were on the forum. It looks like I'll be in good company when I move to Houston next year.

IRISHMAFIA Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:27pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welpe (Post 557383)
Go Rice Owls. :D

No, Western Michigan will take care of Rice
Quote:


I didn't realize how many Texans were on the forum. It looks like I'll be in good company when I move to Houston next year.
Plentiful company, absolutely. "Good" company.......? How far can we go with this one? :D

IRISHMAFIA Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skahtboi (Post 557286)
Seems I have completely lost this thread. :confused: I guess it is safe for me to assume that it has taken on some sort of a football related theme now! :rolleyes:

What was that, Scott? Did I hear you say, "at this rate, this thread will last longer than NAFA in Texas"? :rolleyes:

Welpe Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 557410)
Plentiful company, absolutely. "Good" company.......? How far can we go with this one? :D

Ouch! :D

Dholloway1962 Thu Dec 11, 2008 01:08pm

Texas Whiney:

OU+with+Texas+crying+baby (image)

topper Thu Dec 11, 2008 01:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welpe (Post 557383)
I didn't realize how many Texans were on the forum. It looks like I'll be in good company when I move to Houston next year.

Wadeintothem isn't sending you from CA to do any revamping is he? :D

Skahtboi Thu Dec 11, 2008 02:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 557410)
Plentiful company, absolutely. "Good" company.......? How far can we go with this one? :D


Let it be. Welpe was absolutely correct to begin with! :cool:

Skahtboi Thu Dec 11, 2008 02:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by PtotheB (Post 557292)
Does that mean we get to blame it on TASO? :p


Works for me. Seems they take the blame for everything else! :eek:

Welpe Thu Dec 11, 2008 03:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by topper (Post 557462)
Wadeintothem isn't sending you from CA to do any revamping is he? :D

No...I'm just escaping from California before the state completely implodes upon itself. Besides, I hear the high school football isn't too bad down there either. ;)

whiskers_ump Thu Dec 11, 2008 03:54pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welpe (Post 557383)
Go Rice Owls. :D

I didn't realize how many Texans were on the forum. It looks like I'll be in good company when I move to Houston next year.

Be sure and let us locals know when you arrive.

Skahtboi Thu Dec 11, 2008 03:56pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welpe (Post 557541)
No...I'm just escaping from California before the state completely implodes upon itself. Besides, I hear the high school football isn't too bad down there either. ;)

What the heck is all of this talk about wasting time with football??? :rolleyes:

CecilOne Thu Dec 11, 2008 06:32pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by wadeintothem (Post 556986)
Admittedly, it could be austin area parents are just more whiney. :D

State-Capitol-itis


i.e., more politicians

bkbjones Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welpe (Post 557383)
Go Rice Owls. :D
I didn't realize how many Texans were on the forum. It looks like I'll be in good company when I move to Houston next year.

Just don't lump my fat butt with the Texans. I lived there for most of my life but I refused to join the club. Didn't even own a pickup the whole time I lived there!

Back in the olden days of the Southwest Conference, the Humble Network (Humble pretty much = Exxon) carried all of the football games. This was back so long ago that Rice had a good football team. Anyway, just before kickoff of one game featuring those nice Christian kids of SMU v. the nice Christian kids of Rice, the guy doing play by play says, "Let's go down to the field to listen to this big cheer from the Southern Methodist student body!"

So they did...

"What comes out of a Chinaman's @$$? Rice! Rice! Rice!"

Welpe Fri Dec 12, 2008 01:18am

Duly noted, bkbjones != Texan. ;)

I personally don't think the oil/energy companies in the Gulf Coast are such a bad thing but then I did grow up with four refineries in my backyard.

whiskers, I'll be sure to touch bases with everyone when I touchdown.

shipwreck Fri Dec 12, 2008 06:56am

Welpe, are you playing football now, since you are talking about touchdowns instead of touch downs? Dave

Texasbock Fri Dec 12, 2008 09:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkbjones (Post 557608)
Just don't lump my fat butt with the Texans. I lived there for most of my life but I refused to join the club. Didn't even own a pickup the whole time I lived there!

bkbjones, I hope you are trying to be cute here. Cuz, truth is, we didn't want your carpetbagging, yankee arse here to begin with.....

"You may all go to Hell…I will go to Texas”-Davy Crockett :D

IRISHMAFIA Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:03am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texasbock (Post 557638)
"You may all go to Hell…I will go to Texas”-Davy Crockett :D

Didn't notice anyone trying to stop him, did you? ;)

whiskers_ump Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 557649)
Didn't notice anyone trying to stop him, did you? ;)

Davey, No Way.:D

topper Fri Dec 12, 2008 01:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by whiskers_ump (Post 557674)
Davey, No Way.:D

Take Glen's word for it. He knew Crockett personally. :D

whiskers_ump Fri Dec 12, 2008 02:58pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by topper (Post 557705)
Take Glen's word for it. He knew Crockett personally. :D

You saying I am old. :eek:

Welpe Sat Dec 13, 2008 01:02pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by shipwreck (Post 557624)
Welpe, are you playing football now, since you are talking about touchdowns instead of touch downs? Dave

Oops...sorry, this last season is still fresh in my memory. ;)

CelticNHBlue Mon Dec 15, 2008 12:42pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkbjones (Post 557608)
Just don't lump my fat butt with the Texans. I lived there for most of my life but I refused to join the club. Didn't even own a pickup the whole time I lived there!

Back in the olden days of the Southwest Conference, the Humble Network (Humble pretty much = Exxon) carried all of the football games. This was back so long ago that Rice had a good football team. Anyway, just before kickoff of one game featuring those nice Christian kids of SMU v. the nice Christian kids of Rice, the guy doing play by play says, "Let's go down to the field to listen to this big cheer from the Southern Methodist student body!"

So they did...

"What comes out of a Chinaman's @$$? Rice! Rice! Rice!"


Had to jump in after this one. My old man spent some time at Cornell. Their favorite cheer was against the Ivy school from RI:

"What's the color of horsesh!t? BROWN"

bkbjones Mon Dec 15, 2008 09:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texasbock (Post 557638)
bkbjones, I hope you are trying to be cute here. Cuz, truth is, we didn't want your carpetbagging, yankee arse here to begin with.....

"You may all go to Hell…I will go to Texas”-Davy Crockett :D

Duly noted.

PtotheB Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:13pm

[QUOTE=bkbjones;557608]Just don't lump my fat butt with the Texans. I lived there for most of my life but I refused to join the club. Didn't even own a pickup the whole time I lived there!

Careful when you speak ill of the Republic of Texas. Walker Texas Ranger doesn't take kindly to those who do not pay it enough respect and the last thing you want is to look over your shoulder and see Chuck Norris there.

SRW Tue Dec 16, 2008 03:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by PtotheB (Post 558682)
... the last thing you want is to look over your shoulder and see Chuck Norris there.

If you have $5, and Chuck Norris has $5, Chuck Norris has more money than you.

Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one bird.

There is no CTRL button on Chuck Norris' computer. Chuck Norris is always in control.

whiskers_ump Tue Dec 16, 2008 07:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SRW (Post 558752)
If you have $5, and Chuck Norris has $5, Chuck Norris has more money than you.

Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one bird.

There is no CTRL button on Chuck Norris' computer. Chuck Norris is always in control.


Good thing Davey was not around when Chuck was, or there would have been
no Walker, Texas Ranger.:)

bkbjones Wed Dec 24, 2008 05:54pm

[QUOTE=PtotheB;558682]
Quote:

Originally Posted by bkbjones (Post 557608)
Just don't lump my fat butt with the Texans. I lived there for most of my life but I refused to join the club. Didn't even own a pickup the whole time I lived there!

Careful when you speak ill of the Republic of Texas. Walker Texas Ranger doesn't take kindly to those who do not pay it enough respect and the last thing you want is to look over your shoulder and see Chuck Norris there.

Chuck forgets I am now in the home of Bruce Lee. Bring it on, paid advertisement boy. I do have to give Chuck big kudos for having "relations" with the lady D.A.

Meanwhile, the UPS man has still not delivered any Texas BBQ. Ya'll did remember to send it, right?

Chess Ref Thu Dec 25, 2008 09:04am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SRW (Post 558752)
If you have $5, and Chuck Norris has $5, Chuck Norris has more money than you.

Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one bird.

There is no CTRL button on Chuck Norris' computer. Chuck Norris is always in control.

Chuck is short and cheap.

MichaelVA2000 Thu Dec 25, 2008 03:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SRW (Post 558752)
If you have $5, and Chuck Norris has $5, Chuck Norris has more money than you.

Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one bird.

There is no CTRL button on Chuck Norris' computer. Chuck Norris is always in control.

Who's Chuck Norris?;)

PtotheB Thu Dec 25, 2008 10:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichaelVA2000 (Post 561616)
Who's Chuck Norris?;)

I'm surprised you lived long enough to type the question mark...Chuck Norris has two speeds: Walk, and kill. There is no chin under the Chuck Norris beard, just another fist. Chuck Norris once visited the Virgin Islands: They are now known as "The Islands."

whiskers_ump Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dholloway1962 (Post 557186)
Plenty of Austin whiney going on right now.

BOOMER SOONER

Well, definiately not a NBR 1. Sure did not represent the Big 12 very well.

whiskers_ump Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dholloway1962 (Post 557202)
Texas Tech 39 Texas 33
Oklahoma 65 Texas Tech 21
Texas 28 Okla State 24 (at Texas)
Oklahoma 61 Okla State 41 (at OSU)
I could go on and on but nuff said except:

OU SOONERS BIG 12 Champions.
OU SOONERS vs. FLORIDA in BCS Championship

BOOMER SOONER

:D

What was the score in the so called National Championship Game. Sooner should have Locked up with OU, [Ohio State]. The sure let the BIG 12 down.

Dakota Fri Jan 09, 2009 12:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by whiskers_ump (Post 566395)
What was the score in the so called National Championship Game. Sooner should have Locked up with OU, [Ohio State]. The sure let the BIG 12 down.

Let's not be bitter... your longhorns are showing... :D

Utah for #1

whiskers_ump Fri Jan 09, 2009 03:21pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota (Post 566635)
Let's not be bitter... your longhorns are showing... :D

Utah for #1

I agree with that, then Texas/Fla, USC, then OK.

IRISHMAFIA Fri Jan 09, 2009 04:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by whiskers_ump (Post 566792)
I agree with that, then Texas/Fla, USC, then OK.

The NCAA Div I Football Championship was won by the University of Richmond Spiders and there is no debate.

MichaelVA2000 Fri Jan 09, 2009 06:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by PtotheB (Post 561702)
I'm surprised you lived long enough to type the question mark...Chuck Norris has two speeds: Walk, and kill. There is no chin under the Chuck Norris beard, just another fist. Chuck Norris once visited the Virgin Islands: They are now known as "The Islands."

I'm wondering which speed Norris is using when he's hawking the Total Gym equipment with Christie Brinkley. Rumor has it since Norris joined that team; the commercials have been renamed "com merci fuls".:D

IRISHMAFIA Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:35am

I remember Chuck Norris. He's the judge that allowed Average Joe's to play for the championship after Lance One-nut talked Chicken Peter into returning for the game a little late to be seen on ESPN, the Ocho!

wadeintothem Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:14pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 567072)
I remember Chuck Norris. He's the judge that allowed Average Joe's to play for the championship after Lance One-nut talked Chicken Peter into returning for the game a little late to be seen on ESPN, the Ocho!

http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/8532/jivezg8.gif

IRISHMAFIA Sat Jan 10, 2009 04:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by wadeintothem (Post 567081)

Yep, the Cleaver beaver can!

whiskers_ump Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:10pm

I see U lurking Dakota.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1