![]() |
infeild fly, call/no call
Youngumps post (2 mistakes) got me remembering about a discussion this past summer at a tournament. We were in a long rain delay so the UIC thought it would be a good idea if we had a question and answer session.
The group was a mixture of young and senor umps. One of the younger gals asked about, and described a very similar IF sit where she froze and nothing got verbalized. The ball fell in between F3 & F1 as they both called for it, then stepped back. Everyone advanced safely in the confusion, including the batter. Her question was "Does a non verbal IF call still get the out if everybody advances safely?" The general census was yes until the UIC spoke. He said he was working at the ISC Worlds when this happened and the out was called after the fact. Offense protested after a long discussion and the call got reversed by the powers that be at these tourns. The apparent reasoning or ruling was, " The infeild fly rule is in place to protect the offense runners. If everybody advances safely after a non call there is no more reason to protect the offense" I probably have the wording $crewed up but that was then general words used. I've talked to a few UIC (CASA rule set) since and they disagree. They say a rule is a rule is a rule, to which I agree. Any thoughts or comments? RD |
I think that's a chicken $hit way out of enforcing the rule. The UIC is correct in saying that it's to protect the offense by removing the force on R1 and R2 (and R3, if there is one). But this is only half of the rule.
The UIC's interpretation mentioned in this post is only a survival technique, and I wouldn't recommend it to any umpire on any level. The rule is crystal clear. Yes, you can call it after the fact, but you should call it as soon as you determine it's an IFF. If you have to correct a non-call after the fact, then so be it, but this IS correctable. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But seriously, it was probably because they didn't want to deal with it. There are some who just can't take the heat, and they don't belong in the kitchen. Calls like these do a disservice to every other umpire out there. |
So...
Quote:
Seems to me you can't "halfway" enforce the rule but do you penalize the offense for your mistake? I know what I would do and what I've done in the past I just want to hear some other ideas. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Not to mention the fact that 9 times out of 10, the runners are holding, anticipating a caught fly ball.
So, Mike, are you saying that you'd enforce the IFF after the dust settles? |
I do want to mention that the UIC of that discussion group where we were discussing the was not saying this was the right call, he was just saying what happened at the worlds when he was there. (Year unknown, location unknown)
I have no problem of calling IF after the fact, i've eaten crow before, but I would not be moving runners back. |
Well, this kind of play happens a lot. Sometimes, the fans and teams get so loud, they just can't hear you.
THAT'S when things get to be a huge fuster-cluck. |
IFF is a rule that is applicable, call or not. BR is out, the other runners may advance at their own risk.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Trust me, I am not a quiet guy on the field. If I make a call, everyone knows it on my field and those adjacent. I will not chase them around the field and try to get them to stop, nor will I continually repeat the call until someone wakes up. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33pm. |