The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 29, 2008, 01:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 109
I kinda understand your point.

But logical? The intent of the rule? 1b was stretching away from br.

I incorrectly applied the written rule. And I will never drive over 55 again...unless the wildfire is coming up behind me at 56.

To fundamentally change the game...boot a play, but use the double base rule to get the br out...when there should have been no possible way of doing so??

I guess we could play cross-out or play with a nerf ball. Actually...those little play areas at McDonalds...with the inflatable walls and hundreds of inflatable balls...that would be a logical place to safely play a fastpitch game??

I hope someday...common sense can be invented!!

Rant not intended towards Ed.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 29, 2008, 07:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by socalumps
I kinda understand your point.

But logical? The intent of the rule? 1b was stretching away from br.

To fundamentally change the game...boot a play, but use the double base rule to get the br out...when there should have been no possible way of doing so??

I hope someday...common sense can be invented!!

Rant not intended towards Ed.
Ed's correct. The purpose of the double-base (and trust me, I hate the damn thing), is safety and it makes no sense to require a defender to step in front of a runner to execute the play. Next thing you know, the BR slows down and someone wants an OBS even though it does not apply.

And speaking of a fundament change to the game, you don't consider introducing a double base to the game as a fundamental change? Are you aware that there are some who would like to see it at 3rd, also? This way, the runner on 3rd can stand an extra 15" off the line to avoid being hit by that BB coming off these bats.

Hell, let's put them at every corner of the diamond and eliminate tag plays!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 29, 2008, 08:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 161
Send a message via Skype™ to 7in60
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp
It sounds like F3 is still fielding the ball in fair territory. If that's the case, safe. ASA 8-2-M-3

If the ball went into foul territory, then the defensive player and the BR can use either base. If that's the case, then out. ASA 8-2-M-4
Wow. In Canada, the rule states "R3 must use only the white portion of the safety bag". So I do not have an out on the play.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 29, 2008, 04:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 304
Yeah, but in Canada they play football on a 110 yard field and with 15 or 16 players to a side.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 29, 2008, 05:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 297
but...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu Clary
Yeah, but in Canada they play football on a 110 yard field and with 15 or 16 players to a side.
One less down to get the first down.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 30, 2008, 12:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 161
Send a message via Skype™ to 7in60
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu Clary
Yeah, but in Canada they play football on a 110 yard field and with 15 or 16 players to a side.
Yeah, but we didn't screw up softball as badly.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1