![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Its about as productive as anything else... or moreso. |
Kind of funny...
The rationale for item number one is, "The additional specification makes NFHS softball consistent with ASA". Then, item number two introduces a rule change that is the polar opposite of the ASA ruling- and opposite the ruling for every other softball code (save NCAA, which is one rule set that should have no bearing on amateur youth play). So, is being "consistent with ASA" a valid goal, or not? |
Quote:
Also, several of us responded to Diane Kolb' request for comments about 2008 rules on the NFHS site, but receipt was never confirmed. http://www.nfhs.org/cgi-bin/ultimate...;f=13;t=000976 |
To me NFHS is aligning itself more with the NCAA code in rule specifications and with ASA on equipment specifications.
3 good examples of how the NFHS and NCAA codes are merging. Allowing metal cleats last year This new bunt rule that moves it to the NCAA rule for bunting. Pitching and batting time rules. |
I guess they are caving in to the coaches / parents at large schools, etc., who are SOOOOO concerned about preparing their daughters for college play.
Where is the actual mission of NFHS sports is all of this? I won't be surprised if the step back in pitching is not the next to go, and the plate is moved back to 43'. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And the step back should go away, IMHO. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think Tom may be on to something. Could this be the NFCA influence? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
A little confused....
7-3-1 Clarified that the timeframe for delivering the next pitch or being in the batter's box begins when the ball has been returned to the pitcher to prepare for the next pitch.
Well, that clarifies everything!!! Is this saying that we have judgment as to when the pitcher is prepared for the next pitch? Am I missing something here? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35pm. |