|
|
|
Thu Mar 13, 2008, 09:51am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, since NFHS recognizes a throw to F3 after a base on balls as a play for purposes of the interference rule (running lane violation) - the argument being to prevent the runner from continuing to run to 2B, they would certainly recognize a throw to F5 with the runner on 2B as making a play, following the same argument, wouldn't they?
__________________
Tom 
|
|
Thu Mar 13, 2008, 10:33am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, I will file this under "over-officiating" in my head and put a memo on it to NOT repeat that call with runners on bases.
__________________
Will Rogers must not have ever officiated in Louisiana.
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
