Originally Posted by Steve M

Maybe due to the real job, I think in terms of verification and recoverability by somebody else.

Originally Posted by wadeintothem

I did not go through all 80+ pages.. The beginning was mostly rules.. then algebraic calculus computations to somehow allegedly insure no one gets illegally subbed... After getting the gist of it, I closed it down.

Originally Posted by WestMichBlue

Come on Wade, calm down. If your partner reads off the nine starting numbers, and then the nine starting positions - how long does it take for you to write that on a lineup card? Be serious - 10 to 15 seconds is not big time extra effort! (and another 15 seconds the next half inning for the home team coming to bat.)



When I look at today's card, it looks just like the one I used a month ago. When you look at a lineup card, it doesn't even look like the second one you received for the same game, and neither one looks like the ones your received in the last game!

Consistancy, and intimate knowledge of your card cuts down on the time spent making lineup changes. That is significant compared to the minor time spend preparing the card in the first place.

WMB

Originally Posted by whiskers_ump

Thanks for e-mailing it to me. Got it on some heavy paper and used it this
weekend in Baton Rouge Tournament.

Originally Posted by Skahtboi

And how did it go? The first few times I used it, it took some getting used to. I did some personal tweaking as to how I recopied the lineups, but it is worth it after you adjust.