|
|||
Can you do this?
As a relatively inexperienced FED umpire and 12U travel coach, I wasn't sure if I could do the following.
Situation: ASA rules, my team is the visitors, six inning game, no subs left, bottom of 5th inning, we are up 7-5 One of my outfielders did a very poor slide into second and deeply skinned up her knee. We got her sliding pad over the scrape and finished the inning. Once she sat down in the dugout it was clear that she was not going to continue in the game. I looked at the bench, realizing no subs. I sent one of the starters out to center field and did not report the sub. I knew if we had to bat in the bottom of the 6th, I would be taking an out in the injured players spot in the line-up. Nobody said anything, we retired the other team in the top of the sixth, game was over. Any rule against what I did? Penalty? |
|
|||
If you had no subs, then why "I ... did not report the sub"
wrt "I sent one of the starters out to center field", where was the starter before? That is, was she a DP or ... ? If DP, where was FLEX?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
Quote:
If your illegal sub had been involved in a play, and the opposition protested before the next pitch, your illegal sub would have been disqualified and the offense would have had the option of letting the play stand, or a do-over.
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
I think what you are asking is an unreported substitution and/or illegal substitution. If as cecil says there was a dp involved then you could have done this. IF the DP went into the game on defense for the injured player then you would have been fine (if injured player was flex then they left the game, if not then noone did anything) but from your description they would NOT have been the flex due to your comment of taking an out in the batting order.
So if you put a player that had been in the game in another batting position into the game for a player that was injured the answer was NO that is NOT legal! Please give a few more details and we can give you an exact answer. |
|
|||
No DP or Flex. All nine in the field were batting. The girl that went in the game for the injured player was a starter as was the injured player, so no the sub would not have been in the same spot in the line up as she was originally, thus the out and the reason I did not report her.
|
|
|||
Quote:
What you did was illegal, but you didn't get caught, so you didn't have to pay the penalty.
__________________
Mark NFHS, NCAA, NAFA "If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?" Anton Chigurh - "No Country for Old Men" |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
Quote:
tmielke, check out ASA rule 4, section 6. That will cover just about everything you need with regards to substitutions. If you have any questions, I'm sure we'll be happy to clarify.
__________________
Dave I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views! Screw green, it ain't easy being blue! I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again. |
|
|||
Quote:
You wont see the term on this board.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS |
|
|||
Quote:
I want to second that..if the egomaniacs on the BB board want to use the term, fine.... If what the coach did was intentional, maybe some ethics should be rethought...if it wasnt....definitely a rules class. either way.... lets not get into calling coaches names.... |
|
|||
Question over here in the peanut gallery!
Was this ASA championship play, or was it "just" a tournament? We have rules to cover this sort of thing in our non-championship play tournaments, and this would have been legal under our usual tournament rules. As for the Bruce Froemming wannabe, keep your rat a$$ over on the baseball board. I had to endure a couple of egomaniac wannabes the other day and asked them why in the heell they weren't calling a balk on a kid who was committing a balk on every pitch. Their answer, I would hope half jokingly: "It's too hot to call a balk." This was only the State Sandy Koufax Championships. Quote:
__________________
John An ucking fidiot |
|
|||
Wow, I didn't think that I was a RAT. Oh well.
Yes, I did what I did intentionally. I knew that we would have to take an out in that position in the order if we did have to bat. What I was not sure about was if there was a penalty for the illegal sub on the field. I did not have much time to make my decision and did not want to ask as I felt I might not like the answer, so I decided to send the player out there and deal with the consequences when and if they came up. The illegal sub was never involved in a play. The opposing team never said anything/noticed. As for the RAT and other implications. When I am coaching I care about who wins the games. When I am umpiring I don't. I make my decisions, whether coaching or umpiring based on my knowledge of the rules and my ability to apply them quickly. As both a coach and umpire I am relatively inexperienced. This was not championship play. It was the first game of an invitational. With all that said, I did look up Section 4.6 in the ASA rulebook. When looking at a rule, and you need to make a decision for your team, if you understand and are willing to accept the consequences is it OK to violate a rule? In the situation of an unreported defensive sub: Scenario 1 If the opposing team notifies the umpire before a pitch, the unreported sub must leave the game. No big deal Scenario 2 If the opposing team notifies the umpire after a pitch, the unreported sub is disqualified from the game. Most likely no big deal if I understood the consequences of getting caught. Scenario 3 If the unreported sub makes a play and the opposing team notifies the umpire prior to the next pitch, the unreported sub is disqualified and the offensive team can accept the results of the play or get a "do over". No downside here either. If the offensive team wants a "do over" and the unreported sub was involved in the play, this play would most likely have had a negative outcome had the unreported sub not been in the game. This could actually seen as a positive result for my team. Scenario 4 If the unreported sub makes a play and the opposing team notifies the umpire after the next pitch, the unreported sub is disqualified and the play stands. Still no downside, play stands and I am back to 8 on defense. In my situation, the only downside would be if the sub for the starter I put back in illegally was injured, it could be a forfeit. Likely not though. If the girl wasn't hurt bad enough to leave the dugout, she could at least go stand in fair territory against the outfield fence. All the rest of the consequences really don't penalize the defensive team. Look at it this way. Umpire - "Coach that player has to leave the field". Me "ok". Now I have 8 defensive players which is what I would have had anyways. If the unreported sub isn't noticed and makes a play, then is noticed. It is at worse for me do over after the player is disqualified. Now the rest of my defense has an opportunity to get an out that may not have happened the first time through with only 8 players on the field. Wearing my coaching hat, depending on the situation, I might try it again. Wearing my umpire had, at least I have a much better understanding of the substitution rules. There was a question somewhere in this post. Shoot away! |
|
|||
After that explanation, I can't say I condone your decision to wilfully violate the rules, especially since you're an umpire. Take the following as an example...
In one of the leagues where I call ball, one of the umpires (I'll call her "Julie") in our crew plays for one of the co-ed teams. Turns out one of her teammates is known for bringing doctored bats (they look like Freak 98s) to the game (see this post - same guy). "Julie" has heard these reports as well, and decided to see for herself if the bat was really doctored. She takes her own Freak 98 and compares his with hers. Sure enough, inconsistencies are found. At this point, Julie had a decision to make. It is known throughout the area that she calls for our group, and she has a reputation to uphold. On the other hand, she wanted to play, as she loves the game. In the end, Julie told her team captain, "either the bats go, or I go," and she stuck to her guns. While I can't tell you what to do, tmielke, it would be wise to think about what it means to do what you did: wilfully violate a rule for the sake of winning. It would also be wise to think about the fact that this is a 12U team, and doing what you did accomplished 4 things: 1 - The kids now believe you must win at all costs, even if it means violating rules, or 2 - Your decision was the correct one, and the kids now think this is the rule, and 3 - If the illegal sub got injured, you're now opened up to the possibility that a slick enough lawyer could argue that as an umpire, you should've known better, and you're responsible for her injuries. 4 - You've possibly now gained an ill reputation among other umpires in the area, some of which you may or may not call with. However, you'll probably face them again, and you've lost credibility with them. Just food for thought, and that's all I'll say, coach.
__________________
Dave I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views! Screw green, it ain't easy being blue! I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again. |
Bookmarks |
|
|