The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 06, 2002, 09:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Dakota,

It's funny you should mention Louisville. H&B (Louisville Slugger) was one of the companies found to be intentionally holding back on having their old models tested, and sat back an blamed ASA for making the players buy new ones.

That was one of the reasons ASA backed off to the pre-1995 rule.

Also, I feel no sorrow for ANYONE who is stupid enough to spend $200-400 on a softball bat. Just another method of buying skill instead of developing it.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1