|
|||
Interference?????
Did a high school J.V. game last night, with one team being exceptionally better than the other, not that that makes any difference. Had a play at 2nd base, on a steal attempt, that I realize was a HTBT kind of play but thought I'd throw it out there for some discussion. R1 on first breaks for 2nd base on the pitch. The F4 was standing on the bag awaiting the throw. R1 elects not to slide but pulls up at the last minute actually bumping into F4. The ball arrives at the same time the physical contact occured. F4 momentarily had the ball in her glove attempting the tag but then dropped it!!! I ruled R1 "SAFE" on the dropped ball. Defensive coach wanted interference called, saying F4 has the right to the bag awaiting the throw. R1 could have opted to slide, as her basepath to the bag wasn't blocked. Coach yells that she has to slide, which I told him there is no such rule!!! What say ye???
|
|
|||
Sliding
I'll take a shot at this.
Player doesn't have to slide. It is my understanding the runner has the right to the base. Not what part of the base the defensive player choses to give her. So it sounds like your call was the right call. |
|
|||
Quote:
The rule is plain and simple. The defense cannot impede the runner without possession of the ball. NFHS was one of the first to go to this requirement, so the coach should be well aware of the rule.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
I agree with Mike on this one. As I was reading the OP, I was thinking that this is a clear cut example of OBS.
__________________
Scott It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
AFA the other, it would depend on whether the "bump" was hard enough to cause the ball to be dropped or whether the fielder just missed the through. That part would definitely had to be seen.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Thanks for your reply's, as I actually thought about possible obstruction while the coach was ranting and raving for an interference call. We officials have such a short amount of time to see/think/and make the call, but I think spending alot of time learning from the more experienced ump's on this board is finally paying dividends:-))))
|
|
|||
It's been my experience that this (and similar plays) is the most often mis-called obstruction out there. Umpires should, in cases like this, signal obstruction 100% of the time, even if the runner was safe. Most don't if the runner turns out to be safe before they have time to signal.
Remember - you have the potential for OBS ANY time the fielder is in the runner's path without the ball - you should be thinking that you have potential OBS already at that point. If runner reacts to this fielder at all (slows, contacts, reverses, slides, whatever) before that fielder obtains possession of the ball, then you have OBS, and should signal it immediately. It may turn out that you have no award (as in this case), but it could be important as play develops further that you signal what you saw.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interference on BU | thumpferee | Baseball | 10 | Thu May 12, 2005 10:30pm |
Runner interference versus umpire interference | Jay R | Baseball | 1 | Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm |
Interference or not | Carl Childress | Baseball | 16 | Sun Apr 10, 2005 09:04pm |
Interference | WinterWillie | Softball | 6 | Tue Aug 03, 2004 12:13pm |
Interference | lildani14 | Softball | 8 | Mon Jun 02, 2003 11:22am |