The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Softball (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/)
-   -   Slow Pitch Umps (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/32261-slow-pitch-umps.html)

Chess Ref Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:40am

Slow Pitch Umps
 
I have been encouraged by my NFHS/ASA assignor to help out on the slowpitch side of things this year. SO I have some slowpitch questions. I have looked in the book but my research skills seem to be lacking. So you SP umps have some patience with me and HELP.......please

Illegal Pitch= too high, too low, hits ground before home plate, hits home plate........is my thinking correct on these ?

CLBuffalo Tue Feb 27, 2007 01:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chess Ref
I have been encouraged by my NFHS/ASA assignor to help out on the slowpitch side of things this year. SO I have some slowpitch questions. I have looked in the book but my research skills seem to be lacking. So you SP umps have some patience with me and HELP.......please

Illegal Pitch= too high, too low, hits ground before home plate, hits home plate........is my thinking correct on these ?

IP on too high or too low.

Dead ball and ball on the batter if pitch hits the plate or anywhere on the ground before passing home plate. Also batter can not swing at any pitch that has hit the plate or the ground.

Good luck.

azbigdawg Tue Feb 27, 2007 08:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chess Ref
I have been encouraged by my NFHS/ASA assignor to help out on the slowpitch side of things this year. SO I have some slowpitch questions. I have looked in the book but my research skills seem to be lacking. So you SP umps have some patience with me and HELP.......please

Illegal Pitch= too high, too low, hits ground before home plate, hits home plate........is my thinking correct on these ?

Good luck. Its a great game..... sometimes its even ok at the beer league level. Just like FP learn the nuances from your senior people...the ASA manual has a pretty good umpire section also.

SWFLguy Fri Mar 02, 2007 03:45pm

I worked a league back in CNY that had a league rule
that a ball hitting the plate was a strike !!!
Talk about taking the bat out the the hitter's hands !
There also was a women's league that used a mat---
horrible games when you had a pitcher that couldn't lob
the ball onto it. I felt like asking batters why they bothered
brinig a bat with them !
WALK-WALK- WALK- WALK-.............
(groan)

scottk_61 Fri Mar 02, 2007 04:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SWFLguy
I worked a league back in CNY that had a league rule
that a ball hitting the plate was a strike !!!
Talk about taking the bat out the the hitter's hands !
There also was a women's league that used a mat---
horrible games when you had a pitcher that couldn't lob
the ball onto it. I felt like asking batters why they bothered
brinig a bat with them !
WALK-WALK- WALK- WALK-.............
(groan)

The introduction of the mat and a strike for hitting the plate was the final dumbing down of the game.
I umpired SP for many years, and endured many dense players but even they dont' like the mat.

With the mat, the game becomes a joke all together.

azbigdawg Fri Mar 02, 2007 11:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottk_61
The introduction of the mat and a strike for hitting the plate was the final dumbing down of the game.
I umpired SP for many years, and endured many dense players but even they dont' like the mat.

With the mat, the game becomes a joke all together.


What he said..I cringe when I volunteer to work a league with the mat.... dumbest rule ever.

NDblue Sat Mar 03, 2007 02:17am

The only time they use a mat around here is if there isn't an umpire. Fall co-ed is the only league that uses them because they aren't willing to pay to have a live body behind the catcher.

IRISHMAFIA Sat Mar 03, 2007 08:53am

Quote:

Originally Posted by NDblue
The only time they use a mat around here is if there isn't an umpire. Fall co-ed is the only league that uses them because they aren't willing to pay to have a live body behind the catcher.

And then the catcher and batter end up arguing over whether the ball hit the mat or not :D

Edited to correct spelling

Chess Ref Sat Mar 03, 2007 06:42pm

The standard
 
Well around here the mat definetly seems to be the norm. We also don't have much high end SB.
Some of the SB umps said there is not as much complaining about strikes now......they just complain about arc.......

ukumpire Wed Mar 07, 2007 03:50am

Mat
 
I believe the Mat was endorsed to help out with lower end SP, when it comes to A Grade the Mat is used very little. I think the big Advertsing Tournament that is run annually in Palm Springs uses it, but that is the only big Tournament to use such a concept. It is also used a lot in Canada so I am led to believe. We in the UK have never, and God willing, will never resort to such a rubbish idea.
The Strike Zone belongs to the Umpire, and as such, You can make the batters swing, it is amazing how big the Strike Zone is, when you want it to be.... Slowpitch is a Batting Game

Chess Ref Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:34am

More questions
 
So let me make sure I have this correct .

1. Illegal Pitch means the pitch was too low or too high ?
2. I signal DDB. Batters doesn't swing. Ball on batter . runners advance 1 base. Correct ?

3. Batter swings -play on - Correct ?


4. Ball hits ground=dead ball, do you signal dead ball like in FP ?

archangel Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chess Ref
So let me make sure I have this correct .

1. Illegal Pitch means the pitch was too low or too high ?
2. I signal DDB. Batters doesn't swing. Ball on batter . runners advance 1 base. Correct ?

3. Batter swings -play on - Correct ?


4. Ball hits ground=dead ball, do you signal dead ball like in FP ?

1. yes, those are 2 examples of IP
2. Wrong, runners dont advance on high/low illegal pitches
3. Yes, play on
4. Yes

archangel Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chess Ref
So let me make sure I have this correct .

1. Illegal Pitch means the pitch was too low or too high ?
2. I signal DDB. Batters doesn't swing. Ball on batter . runners advance 1 base. Correct ?

3. Batter swings -play on - Correct ?


4. Ball hits ground=dead ball, do you signal dead ball like in FP ?

1. yes, those are 2 examples of IP
2. Wrong, runners dont advance on high/low illegal pitches, and calling out "illegal pitch" is enough (lets batter know)
3. Yes, play on
4. Yes

rodan55 Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:56pm

Will the games be played with stealing?

Chess Ref Tue Mar 20, 2007 01:03pm

no stealing
 
I don't believe there is stealing allowed. This are pretty much middle to high beer leagues.......

NDblue Tue Mar 20, 2007 06:30pm

With an addition to signaling DB, I also say loud enough for the batter and catcher to hear me, "illegal". The pitcher doesn't need to hear me as they should be able to see the signal but if they ask (nicely), I'll tell them what the problem was with the pitch.

jimpiano Tue Mar 20, 2007 07:35pm

Unless there is stealing signaling dead ball is a waste of effort. Nothing in slow pitch can happen until the batter swings.

scottk_61 Tue Mar 20, 2007 09:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
Unless there is stealing signaling dead ball is a waste of effort. Nothing in slow pitch can happen until the batter swings.

It might be wasted effort, but it is a required mechanic that will save you some grief at some point when the whiner,,,,,I mean pitcher, says, "but you didn't signal illegal, you can't claim it after the pitch got there,"

CYA, make the signal too

IRISHMAFIA Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by NDblue
With an addition to signaling DB, I also say loud enough for the batter and catcher to hear me, "illegal". The pitcher doesn't need to hear me as they should be able to see the signal but if they ask (nicely), I'll tell them what the problem was with the pitch.

I'm sure you meant "DDB"

NDblue Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:34pm

I meant to say Dead Ball and that's what I thought I said. :confused:

scottk_61 Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by NDblue
I meant to say Dead Ball and that's what I thought I said. :confused:

I thought you meant DDB also.
Why would you say DB instead of DDB? or have I been removed to some alternate universe where it is now a DB:D

NDblue Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:02am

What the heck does DDB stand for? Dead Ball is 2 words and those words start with a "D" and a "B" hence DB for Dead Ball. Where is the second "D" coming from?:confused:

SRW Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:50am

Quote:

Originally Posted by NDblue
What the heck does DDB stand for? Dead Ball is 2 words and those words start with a "D" and a "B" hence DB for Dead Ball. Where is the second "D" coming from?:confused:

Delayed Dead Ball

Skahtboi Wed Mar 21, 2007 08:27am

DB=Dead ball. Signal=both hands raised with palms toward the front.

DDB=Delayed dead ball. Signal=left arm extended to the side.


When you said:

Quote:

Originally Posted by NDblue
With an addition to signaling DB...

you really should have been signalling a DDB.

Dakota Wed Mar 21, 2007 09:46am

Quote:

Originally Posted by NDblue
What the heck does DDB stand for? Dead Ball is 2 words and those words start with a "D" and a "B" hence DB for Dead Ball. Where is the second "D" coming from?:confused:

They're originally from Chicago. It means da dead ball... DDB. :)

IRISHMAFIA Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:56am

Quote:

Originally Posted by NDblue
What the heck does DDB stand for? Dead Ball is 2 words and those words start with a "D" and a "B" hence DB for Dead Ball. Where is the second "D" coming from?:confused:

An illegal pitch is a delayed dead ball.

scottk_61 Wed Mar 21, 2007 11:07am

Quote:

Originally Posted by NDblue
What the heck does DDB stand for? Dead Ball is 2 words and those words start with a "D" and a "B" hence DB for Dead Ball. Where is the second "D" coming from?:confused:

I was actually thinking back to my days of living in Louisiana with the Cajun influence so I guess I should have said, DDDB.

"Dat dere dead ball":D

NDblue Wed Mar 21, 2007 05:55pm

Now I know and I apologize for not knowing the correct internet acronym. I really meant to say "delayed dead ball" and now I know it's DDB and I won't forget. :)

jimpiano Wed Mar 21, 2007 09:56pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottk_61
It might be wasted effort, but it is a required mechanic that will save you some grief at some point when the whiner,,,,,I mean pitcher, says, "but you didn't signal illegal, you can't claim it after the pitch got there,"

CYA, make the signal too

The question referred to a dead ball, i.e hitting the ground before the plate,,,,This is not an illegal pitch or a delayed dead ball and requires no signal, verbal or visual, unless there is stealing.

On an illegal pitch the umpire can declare it at anytime the umpire determines it is illegal,,,even if this means when it has become dead by being caught by the catcher.

Everyone on the field can whine ....but it changes nothing.

IRISHMAFIA Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:50am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
The question referred to a dead ball, i.e hitting the ground before the plate,,,,This is not an illegal pitch or a delayed dead ball and requires no signal, verbal or visual, unless there is stealing.

On an illegal pitch the umpire can declare it at anytime the umpire determines it is illegal,,,even if this means when it has become dead by being caught by the catcher.

Everyone on the field can whine ....but it changes nothing.

Well, actually :rolleyes: the OP offered the possibility the ball hitting the ground in front of the plate as an IP. The first response separated the IP from dead ball. However, the recent responses were to Tom who stated he gives a DB signal on an IP. We were just seeking clarification to avoid confusion for any non-veteran umpire.

However, there is a prescribe mechanic for a ball hitting the plate or ground in front of the plate or the batter which is described on page 225 of umpire manual section of the 2007 ASA Umpire Edition of the rules book.

It is a good mechanic to use for all SP games whether stealing is being allowed or not. For years, umpires have been pointing to the plate, pounding their fists or making some other type of silly looking signal to indicate to the pitcher that the ball hit the plate. ASA has now provided a standard mechanic for this occurence and I see no reason why it should not be utilized when applicable.

jimpiano Thu Mar 22, 2007 06:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Well, actually :rolleyes: the OP offered the possibility the ball hitting the ground in front of the plate as an IP. The first response separated the IP from dead ball. However, the recent responses were to Tom who stated he gives a DB signal on an IP. We were just seeking clarification to avoid confusion for any non-veteran umpire.

However, there is a prescribe mechanic for a ball hitting the plate or ground in front of the plate or the batter which is described on page 225 of umpire manual section of the 2007 ASA Umpire Edition of the rules book.

It is a good mechanic to use for all SP games whether stealing is being allowed or not. For years, umpires have been pointing to the plate, pounding their fists or making some other type of silly looking signal to indicate to the pitcher that the ball hit the plate. ASA has now provided a standard mechanic for this occurence and I see no reason why it should not be utilized when applicable.

Unless a pitched ball is illegal for another reason one that simply fails to get over the plate is a ball and is dead, unless there is stealing.

Page 225 refers to games with stealing and the prescribed mechanic has no meaning in games where there is no stealing, i.e almost all slow pitch softball games.

The umpire is under no obligation to explain, visually or verbally, why a ball is a ball,,,,,but the universal pounding of the fists is clear to all players,including the "umpires" at shortstop and in the outfield, that the ball did not cross the plate.

Whoever invented it should get royalties.

SRW Thu Mar 22, 2007 06:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
Unless a pitched ball is illegal for another reason one that simply fails to get over the plate is a ball and is dead, unless there is stealing.

Page 225 refers to games with stealing and the prescribed mechanic has no meaning in games where there is no stealing, i.e almost all slow pitch softball games.

The umpire is under no obligation to explain, visually or verbally, why a ball is a ball,,,,,but the universal pounding of the fists is clear to all players,including the "umpires" at shortstop and in the outfield, that the ball did not cross the plate.

Whoever invented it should get royalties.

I guess I don't see in the mechanics where "pounding the fists" is a prescribed mechanic... especially a "universal" one. Can you explain how that's done, or where in the umpire manual that it talks about that?

:rolleyes:

IRISHMAFIA Thu Mar 22, 2007 07:47pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
Unless a pitched ball is illegal for another reason one that simply fails to get over the plate is a ball and is dead, unless there is stealing.

Page 225 refers to games with stealing and the prescribed mechanic has no meaning in games where there is no stealing, i.e almost all slow pitch softball games.

Excuse me for being a smart ***, but no ****! There had to be something put in place to accommodate the players and BU in the situation prescribed. That doesn't mean you just ignore it's value.

Quote:

The umpire is under no obligation to explain, visually or verbally, why a ball is a ball,,,,,but the universal pounding of the fists is clear to all players,including the "umpires" at shortstop and in the outfield, that the ball did not cross the plate.

Whoever invented it should get royalties.
Actually, the indication is that the ball hit the plate. Many lazy or intimated umpires point to the ground and say "short" when the ball hits in front of the plate.

Nonetheless, since you are on page 225 of the umpire manual, maybe you should check paragraph 11 on the opposite page.

jimpiano Thu Mar 22, 2007 07:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SRW
I guess I don't see in the mechanics where "pounding the fists" is a prescribed mechanic... especially a "universal" one. Can you explain how that's done, or where in the umpire manual that it talks about that?

:rolleyes:

It is not in the manual.

It is simply a mechanic of experience that serves a purpose.

jimpiano Thu Mar 22, 2007 08:32pm

"There had to be something put in place to accommodate the players and BU in the situation prescribed"

Sure, for games in which there is stealing. But since most games do not have stealing the mechanic is useless.

I never use a hand signal to describe the location of a pitch. I do use the fist hit to let everyone know the ball hit the plate.

If that is not your style, so be it. It is, after all, my game when I am behind the plate, and yours when you are there.

azbigdawg Thu Mar 22, 2007 08:32pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
It is not in the manual.

It is simply a mechanic of experience that serves a purpose.


bull****...


The jackass that invented that lazy, half-assed mechanic should be shot along with the moron who invented closed fist pounding for a full count....

jimpiano Thu Mar 22, 2007 09:02pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by azbigdawg
bull****...


The jackass that invented that lazy, half-assed mechanic should be shot along with the moron who invented closed fist pounding for a full count....

If you dont like it, don't use it.

I think it is the greatest and most useful signal ever invented. And there is no doubt in anyone's mind, even in co-ed or church league as to what it means.

HawkeyeCubP Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:37pm

My Two Cents
 
1. Pounding the fists is sloppy, good-ol'- boy, and lazy-looking, is not an official mechanic, and does a disservice to those of us who strictly follow ASA mechanics while working ASA slow pitch games. There are people in my association who do this - they are, I'll be so bold as to say the EXACT same group of umpires who also never drop to the set position while calling pitches, point to 1B on most walks, and button hook in about 1/5 of the time when out on the bases. Odd how they are not the ones who are invited to work the state, regional, or national tournaments.
2. To be fair, the table on p. 187 of the 2007 Umpire Manual does say "slow pitch with stealing," when referring to the new mechanic. So it could be said that the book says to do it both ways.
3. If my UIC mandated what Mike is suggesting for games without stealing, I wouldn't mind, but that's not how it is as of this moment. I don't currently do or say anything other than "ball" when an otherwise legal, pitched ball hits the plate.

bkbjones Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:32am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
Whoever invented it should get royalties.

You are correct. They should get royalties. Here is a quarter so he can go call all the other lazy ******* who use this mechanic.

The other thing that gripes me about it is when I hear this from players: "Why don't you give that signal like the other umpires do?"

Umpires that use unapproved mechanics, just like those who work a game in half a uniform, no uniform or a sloppy uniform, do a disservice to every other umpire, no matter if they wear a blue, red, white, gray, green, black or some other color shirt.

Why do some point to first? Do THAT many batters still not know the way to first base? Why do we hit our fist with our palm or palm with our fist on a ball that hits the plate? Would we use that signal on an uncaught foul ball when it strikes the ground beyond a base? why not? People use it all the time to signal a dead ball.

Just as it is either a ball or a strike, it is either live or dead. If I point at the ground, you can bet your a$$ it's a fair ball. Bull$hit mechanics bring all of us down, whether it is half-baked buttonhooks, mirroring your partner on foul ball calls (or even worse, the ball/strike count) and crappy mechanics.

More after supper...I just got home from a slow pitch double header. I pointed toward fair territory four times during the games - to signify foul balls. I did not hit my fist with my palm. I survived.

jimpiano Fri Mar 23, 2007 02:05am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkbjones
You are correct. They should get royalties. Here is a quarter so he can go call all the other lazy ******* who use this mechanic.

The other thing that gripes me about it is when I hear this from players: "Why don't you give that signal like the other umpires do?"

Umpires that use unapproved mechanics, just like those who work a game in half a uniform, no uniform or a sloppy uniform, do a disservice to every other umpire, no matter if they wear a blue, red, white, gray, green, black or some other color shirt.

Why do some point to first? Do THAT many batters still not know the way to first base? Why do we hit our fist with our palm or palm with our fist on a ball that hits the plate? Would we use that signal on an uncaught foul ball when it strikes the ground beyond a base? why not? People use it all the time to signal a dead ball.

Just as it is either a ball or a strike, it is either live or dead. If I point at the ground, you can bet your a$$ it's a fair ball. Bull$hit mechanics bring all of us down, whether it is half-baked buttonhooks, mirroring your partner on foul ball calls (or even worse, the ball/strike count) and crappy mechanics.

More after supper...I just got home from a slow pitch double header. I pointed toward fair territory four times during the games - to signify foul balls. I did not hit my fist with my palm. I survived.

God forbid we should ever use a non-prescribed book mechanic that actually helped a player understand the game.

Why should we point to first base when a 35 year old office manager walks in her first game ever?

Or hit our fists to let a 60 year old minister know his pitch was a ball because it hit the plate?

Well, without the players enjoying the game, we have no job.

We owe everyone hustle, a knowledge of the rules, and the mechanics that puts us in position to see the play.

How we signal a strike or a sellout defines us and cannot ever be copied from a book written by a committee.

So, pardon me, if I use my individuality to make calls and to use signals the players can understand and learn from.

I am not changing after 35 years to become a clone.

azbigdawg Fri Mar 23, 2007 04:19am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
God forbid we should ever use a non-prescribed book mechanic that actually helped a player understand the game.

Why should we point to first base when a 35 year old office manager walks in her first game ever?

Or hit our fists to let a 60 year old minister know his pitch was a ball because it hit the plate?

Well, without the players enjoying the game, we have no job.

We owe everyone hustle, a knowledge of the rules, and the mechanics that puts us in position to see the play.

How we signal a strike or a sellout defines us and cannot ever be copied from a book written by a committee.

So, pardon me, if I use my individuality to make calls and to use signals the players can understand and learn from.

I am not changing after 35 years to become a clone.

No, please..DONT change..that makes it easy for us to identify who you are..... enjoy your church league.....

shipwreck Fri Mar 23, 2007 06:07am

John, you pointed to fair territory 4 times to signal foul balls???????????? Hmmm, Dave

IRISHMAFIA Fri Mar 23, 2007 07:04am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
God forbid we should ever use a non-prescribed book mechanic that actually helped a player understand the game.

Why should we point to first base when a 35 year old office manager walks in her first game ever?

Or hit our fists to let a 60 year old minister know his pitch was a ball because it hit the plate?

Well, without the players enjoying the game, we have no job.

We owe everyone hustle, a knowledge of the rules, and the mechanics that puts us in position to see the play.

How we signal a strike or a sellout defines us and cannot ever be copied from a book written by a committee.

So, pardon me, if I use my individuality to make calls and to use signals the players can understand and learn from.

I am not changing after 35 years to become a clone.

You're right, we're wrong.

Isn't that amazing, all the games I've worked and I just found out I'm supposed to look like a clone!

If you had any experience at the upper levels, you would see that all those who do it right, all do it a little bit differently. None of us look the same on the field, yet we all subscribed to the prescribed mechanics.

Just continue doing what you do. It actually makes the guys who do it right look that much better. And for that, thank you.

Skahtboi Fri Mar 23, 2007 09:04am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
I think it is the greatest and most useful signal ever invented.

Are you serious?? Of all the signals we use, this is the greatest and most useful??? Wow!

jimpiano Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:35am

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
You're right, we're wrong.

Isn't that amazing, all the games I've worked and I just found out I'm supposed to look like a clone!

If you had any experience at the upper levels, you would see that all those who do it right, all do it a little bit differently. None of us look the same on the field, yet we all subscribed to the prescribed mechanics.

Just continue doing what you do. It actually makes the guys who do it right look that much better. And for that, thank you.

Mike,

The only right way is to hustle and know the rules. After that game management is determined by the umpire and the players in the game. A hand signal that helps them understand is hardly a tool that should be held against an umpire. The double fist is appropraite at some levels and not needed in others.

I simply thank whoever invented it becauase it has been a useful tool over the years in letting all the players in the field know what happened.

archangel Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:12pm

How ironic that after 30 yrs of pitching- maybe 1000 Sp games played, and 10 years of umping SP and varsity baseball, I have never seen or heard of that "mechanic".....

IRISHMAFIA Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by archangel
How ironic that after 30 yrs of pitching- maybe 1000 Sp games played, and 10 years of umping SP and varsity baseball, I have never seen or heard of that "mechanic".....

Well, you are not going to see it in baseball, but if you never saw it in 1000 SP games, you must have been blessed with well-trained umpires.:eek:

Yeah, I know, what's this world coming to!!!

Dakota Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:32pm

I have a question: Why is it necessary, or even good, for the umpire to make sure that all the players know the reason for a pitch being called a BALL?

ukumpire Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45pm

Ball - Mechanic
 
It is my believe, (and I read part of it somewhere in this thread) that the 'fists together' is only done at lower end slowpitch, and it is normally only done when that 12" or 11" sucker hits the ground and edge of plate simultaneously, thus still causing a bounce. If it is straight edge of plate then it slides or spins to the ground. Certainly in ISF and I believe in ASA this is not the norm for the umpire to assist the pitcher, but it is infact the catchers duty to inform the pitcher. We do not have signs for inside / outside, so why a ball on plate. Let the catcher at least do something in slowpitch than just throwing it back to the pitcher after every ball! Well, okay, they also cover 1st after a hit!!! The point is that you will never see it for obviuos reasons in fast or baseball ... And if that young man has never seen the signal after 1000 games pitching and umpiring then all I can say is WOW ...:) :)

Skahtboi Fri Mar 23, 2007 01:27pm

I guess to me, the "hitting the plate" mechanic being described is pretty pointless. It is a case where the umpire, usually unsure of himself, feels the need to tell everyone where the pitch was, like verbally calling "inside" or "low" or "high" or "outside." One of my favorites I heard one of these directions givers use was "at the knees," but we won't go into the problems inherent with that. I don't see why the umpire just doesn't call "off the plate," or something of that nature, rather than using the "fist indicator." :D

ukumpire Fri Mar 23, 2007 01:36pm

Calls
 
Better still - 'Don't Call Nothing'
Okay end of this thread for me . it's too long:rolleyes:

Dakota Fri Mar 23, 2007 02:24pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skahtboi
... It is a case where the umpire, usually unsure of himself, feels the need to tell everyone where the pitch was, like verbally calling "inside" or "low" or "high" or "outside." ...

That is not limited to slow pitch umpires. And, I agree, that it seems to me to indicate a lack of confidence - trying to forestall the griping and such. The most I do in this regard is the slight "look" or head movement in the direction of where the pitch missed (but, I'm talking FP, not SP).

If the catcher asks, I'll answer. If the coach asks I'll sometimes answer; sometimes I'll tell the catcher what to tell the coach.

Dakota Fri Mar 23, 2007 02:24pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ukumpire
...Okay end of this thread for me . it's too long:rolleyes:

Gosh, what would you have done with the background investigation thread! :eek:

IRISHMAFIA Fri Mar 23, 2007 02:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
Gosh, what would you have done with the background investigation thread! :eek:

Want to find out????? :D

SRW Fri Mar 23, 2007 03:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
A hand signal that helps them understand is hardly a tool that should be held against an umpire. The double fist is appropraite at some levels and not needed in others.

I simply thank whoever invented it becauase it has been a useful tool over the years in letting all the players in the field know what happened.

I'm still confused.

If the ball is hit and fouls back to the fence, do you do your little fist pumping action for that dead ball?

Or if there's an interference call from the runner who crashed into F4 about to receive the batted ball - fist pump? Maybe a double fist pump since two people collided?

What about when Sheri the Office Manager fouls one into her right foot? Is that a "fist-to-foot pump" mechanic? Does it change if it's her left foot?

No of course you don't do those mechanics. Why? Because they're not prescribed mechanics.

So why the hell do you "fist pump" when it hits the plate?

A ball that hits the plate is dead. Period. Give the Dead Ball signal (stealing or not), then call the ball. The If the players ask you why it's a dead ball, tell them why. But don't be using lazy-assed, sandlot mechanics.

PS: is your last name Gilman?

jimpiano Fri Mar 23, 2007 07:37pm

Unless there is stealing, the result of any legal pitch that is not swung at is a dead bal in slow pitch. Why would you use a dead ball signal for a pitch that hit the plate? If you use it to let everyone know that the reason the pitch is a ball is beause it hit the plate, how is that any differnt than a double fist?

Why in the world you jump on umpires who use the double fist is beyond me.

jimpiano Fri Mar 23, 2007 07:47pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skahtboi
I guess to me, the "hitting the plate" mechanic being described is pretty pointless. It is a case where the umpire, usually unsure of himself, feels the need to tell everyone where the pitch was, like verbally calling "inside" or "low" or "high" or "outside." One of my favorites I heard one of these directions givers use was "at the knees," but we won't go into the problems inherent with that. I don't see why the umpire just doesn't call "off the plate," or something of that nature, rather than using the "fist indicator." :D

If you don't like the mechanic, dont use it.

bkbjones Fri Mar 23, 2007 09:30pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
If you don't like the mechanic, dont use it.

Don't worry, we won't.

BretMan Fri Mar 23, 2007 09:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
Why in the world you jump on umpires who use the double fist is beyond me.

Okay. I'll take a crack.

(But somehow I doubt that you're going to listen to me any more than you've listened to anyone else here.)

Because this is not an approved signal as desribed in any umpire manual that I am aware of.

I don't know what your situation is, as far as local associations, evaluations or game assignments are concerned. For me, if I am being evaluated and use non-standard signals I can count on being dinged by the evaluator. This can stifle advancement and lead to fewer game assignments.

If you start using non-approved signals, where do you draw the line? Should umpires have their own set of signals to use however they see fit?

Here's a line from the ASA umpire manual:

"The adopted signals are dignified, informative, meaningful, and therefore, shall be used by all umpires. Poorly executed and unauthorized signals serve only to confuse."

Since these are the guidelines I'm evaluated under, I do not use non-standard signals.

jimpiano Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BretMan
Okay. I'll take a crack.

(But somehow I doubt that you're going to listen to me any more than you've listened to anyone else here.)

Because this is not an approved signal as desribed in any umpire manual that I am aware of.

I don't know what your situation is, as far as local associations, evaluations or game assignments are concerned. For me, if I am being evaluated and use non-standard signals I can count on being dinged by the evaluator. This can stifle advancement and lead to fewer game assignments.

If you start using non-approved signals, where do you draw the line? Should umpires have their own set of signals to use however they see fit?

Here's a line from the ASA umpire manual:

"The adopted signals are dignified, informative, meaningful, and therefore, shall be used by all umpires. Poorly executed and unauthorized signals serve only to confuse."

Since these are the guidelines I'm evaluated under, I do not use non-standard signals.

I have neer been dinged by any evaluator, or anyone, for using the double fist to signify the ball hitting the plate.

scottk_61 Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:22am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
I have neer been dinged by any evaluator, or anyone, for using the double fist to signify the ball hitting the plate.

I have stayed out of this a bit just to let the other voices of experience (and those who give a sh** about doing things right) BUT...................

If you want to use a weird mechanic and thus "teach" the teams you work with that doing things half_a$$ is what you are all about, then fine.
Have fun.
If you want to do things right, help the teams have a good game without conflict, and be able to understand the umpires they do have that are good.

THEN DO IT RIGHT.:mad:

I worked for years to learn all that I could about proper mechanics and still keep learning as the requirements change. I take pride in myself and my fellow blues.
I expect the game to be done correctly by me and my partners.
But then again, I have had higher aspirations as to game assignments.
I wanted to become a ASA Gold umpire at first,
Then I wanted to be a member of the National Indicator Fraternity
Then I wanted to become as ASA ELITE,
Then I wanted my ISF.

I achieved my goals.
Working around 35 - 38 Nationals over the years.
I have enjoyed the time with many great memories.

One thing I have found at every National I have ever worked,
Team complaints about the "umpire back home" who did this or that etc that had nothing to do with proper mechanics or rules application.

So, if you don't give a rat's a$$ about doing it right for your own games, consider and show some respect for your fellow blues and stick to the prescribed mechanics so we don't have to "re-educate" the teams when they make it to a regional or a national tounament.

This really is about respect,
Your respect for the game and your responsibility to the teams that you serve.
OK

jimpiano Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:34am

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottk_61
I have stayed out of this a bit just to let the other voices of experience (and those who give a sh** about doing things right) BUT...................

If you want to use a weird mechanic and thus "teach" the teams you work with that doing things half_a$$ is what you are all about, then fine.
Have fun.
If you want to do things right, help the teams have a good game without conflict, and be able to understand the umpires they do have that are good.

THEN DO IT RIGHT.:mad:

I worked for years to learn all that I could about proper mechanics and still keep learning as the requirements change. I take pride in myself and my fellow blues.
I expect the game to be done correctly by me and my partners.
But then again, I have had higher aspirations as to game assignments.
I wanted to become a ASA Gold umpire at first,
Then I wanted to be a member of the National Indicator Fraternity
Then I wanted to become as ASA ELITE,
Then I wanted my ISF.

I achieved my goals.
Working around 35 - 38 Nationals over the years.
I have enjoyed the time with many great memories.

One thing I have found at every National I have ever worked,
Team complaints about the "umpire back home" who did this or that etc that had nothing to do with proper mechanics or rules application.

So, if you don't give a rat's a$$ about doing it right for your own games, consider and show some respect for your fellow blues and stick to the prescribed mechanics so we don't have to "re-educate" the teams when they make it to a regional or a national tounament.

This really is about respect,
Your respect for the game and your responsibility to the teams that you serve.
OK

It is rather presumptious and unprofessional for you to bash anyone,especially one you do not know.

The signal I desribed, the double fist for ball hitting the plate, violates no standard covered by ASA. I find it useful at several levels in making the game enjoyable and informational for the players.

I would never use it at an advanced level of play since it would be of no value.


I am glad you reached your goals, although I am sure one of them was not to be rude.

scottk_61 Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:48am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
It is rather presumptious and unprofessional for you to bash anyone,especially one you do not know.

The signal I desribed, the double fist for ball hitting the plate, violates no standard covered by ASA. I find it useful at several levels in making the game enjoyable and informational for the players.

I would never use it at an advanced level of play since it would be of no value.


I am glad you reached your goals, although I am sure one of them was not to be rude.

Presumtious of me to bash you???????????????
That could be but I doubt it.
I do bash umpires that make the real umpires look stupid by your omission of proper mechanics.
The signal you describe DOES INDEED violate standards covered by ASA for you to say otherwise is arrogant and stupid thus worthy of bashing.
One of my goals has been to use any means necessary to get sub-standard umpires to improve their game.
That has included being blunt, rude, beratting in fun and sometimes telling an umpire to go home.
It has also included having tons of fun, teaching, exhorting, etc.
It also has included the pleasure of seeing those who are teachable reach a deserved regional and national assignment.

Hey, if you are content to be a slug and stink up the field, so be it.
Just don't expect any kind words from real umpires, Ok?

HawkeyeCubP Sat Mar 24, 2007 02:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
The signal I desribed, the double fist for ball hitting the plate, violates no standard covered by ASA.

You're ignoring the UIC's on here that state it should not be used. UIC's don't make up their standards for what should and shouldn't be done, as far as I know.

jimpiano Sat Mar 24, 2007 02:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottk_61
Presumtious of me to bash you???????????????
That could be but I doubt it.
I do bash umpires that make the real umpires look stupid by your omission of proper mechanics.
The signal you describe DOES INDEED violate standards covered by ASA for you to say otherwise is arrogant and stupid thus worthy of bashing.
One of my goals has been to use any means necessary to get sub-standard umpires to improve their game.
That has included being blunt, rude, beratting in fun and sometimes telling an umpire to go home.
It has also included having tons of fun, teaching, exhorting, etc.
It also has included the pleasure of seeing those who are teachable reach a deserved regional and national assignment.

Hey, if you are content to be a slug and stink up the field, so be it.
Just don't expect any kind words from real umpires, Ok?

I have seen over 30 different rule books and umpire's manuals(or variastions) since I started umpiring. The suggested mechanics have changed dozens of times. The constants center on hustle, a thorough knowledge of the rules, and to dress and behave professionally.

I made a comment about a technique that hundreds of ASA umpires, and others, use and said I liked it. It is well within the parameters of techniques that each umpire uses to manage a game.

You may not like the technique which is your choice.

Your responses, however, hardly reflect the level of achievement you claim to have.

Dakota Sat Mar 24, 2007 03:27pm

Here is my take on this topic:

1) The prescribed mechanics and signals are so partners can work with each other first time on the field and so players, coaches, and fans will know what the umpire's call is without having to hear the verbal.

2) Many umpires object to limiting themselves to these mechanics and signals because of everything from local custom to a built-in rebellious streak.

3) Non-standard signals and mechanics are evidence of a less well-trained umpire or one who basically doesn't give a damn about what his sanctioning body requires or recommends. He's gonna do it his way and nobody can stop him.

4) The fist-pounding serves no useful purpose. It communicates no information that the players need to have to know what they should do. It is no different from any other call of "ball". If there is no stealing, they don't do anything anyway. If there is stealing, the dead ball call works, is standard, and everyone understands what it means.

Fist pounding is hardly the only example of non-prescribed signals. It is, however, evidence of... well, see #3.

No one is going to change Mr Piano's mind, and if you browse the other boards on this site, you'll notice that his internet personna is at least consistent.

jimpiano Sat Mar 24, 2007 03:35pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
Here is my take on this topic:

1) The prescribed mechanics and signals are so partners can work with each other first time on the field and so players, coaches, and fans will know what the umpire's call is without having to hear the verbal.

2) Many umpires object to limiting themselves to these mechanics and signals because of everything from local custom to a built-in rebellious streak.

3) Non-standard signals and mechanics are evidence of a less well-trained umpire or one who basically doesn't give a damn about what his sanctioning body requires or recommends. He's gonna do it his way and nobody can stop him.

4) The fist-pounding serves no useful purpose. It communicates no information that the players need to have to know what they should do. It is no different from any other call of "ball". If there is no stealing, they don't do anything anyway. If there is stealing, the dead ball call works, is standard, and everyone understands what it means.

Fist pounding is hardly the only example of non-prescribed signals. It is, however, evidence of... well, see #3.

No one is going to change Mr Piano's mind, and if you browse the other boards on this site, you'll notice that his internet personna is at least consistent.

Well, your discussion in (1) is certainly true.
Your conclusion in (3) is wrong.

The mechanic I described does not violate any thing in the manual and is a well established custom in the leagues our association officiates. We sent three umpires to the nationals last year, alone.

scottk_61 Sat Mar 24, 2007 03:48pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
Well, your discussion in (1) is certainly true.
Your conclusion in (3) is wrong.

The mechanic I described does not violate any thing in the manual and is a well established custom in the leagues our association officiates. We sent three umpires to the nationals last year, alone.

And again, we see the arrogance of a willful ignorance that manifests itself in magnanimous fashion.

Why am I beginning to think this guy is a troll?

Dakota Sat Mar 24, 2007 03:51pm

I note you didn't dispute #4. So, why do it?
Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
Well, your discussion in (1) is certainly true.
Your conclusion in (3) is wrong.

Really? The second part of #3 doesn't fit you? Gosh, ya fooled me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
The mechanic I described does not violate any thing in the manual ...

Not true. ASA Umpire Manual, Slow Plate Mechanics, Calling Balls and Strikes,
Quote:

The umpire is not to be an announcer or broadcaster on the field. Let the people broadcasting the game describe the pitches... All the umpire should say is 'ball' or 'strike'. Describing the pitch is a cop out for an umpire... use only a slight body motion toward the location of the pitch.
There is more, but you aren't interested anyway.

scottk_61 Sat Mar 24, 2007 03:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
I have neer been dinged by any evaluator, or anyone, for using the double fist to signify the ball hitting the plate.

This could only be construed to mean that you have never been actually or adequately evaluated, now doesn't it?

Just what association do you belong to?
To what part of the US can we ascribe this aberration of the known world?

jimpiano Sat Mar 24, 2007 04:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
I note you didn't dispute #4. So, why do it? Really? The second part of #3 doesn't fit you? Gosh, ya fooled me.

Not true. ASA Umpire Manual, Slow Plate Mechanics, Calling Balls and Strikes, There is more, but you aren't interested anyway.

There is no verbal with the double fist,,,,so the admonition about being a broadcaster or an announcer has no bearing on the discusion.

scottk_61 Sat Mar 24, 2007 04:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
<SNIP>
I am not changing after 35 years to become a clone.

That last sentance says it all.
I may not have worked slow pitch for 35 years but have for 25 plus.
I have had to change mechanics many times over the years and didn't like the changes at first in most cases.
However, I wanted to do the game right so I changed.
The whole thing is attitude, an attitude of respect for the game, players and your fellow blues.

You attitude is one reason the Player Reps and other council members see umpires as a only slightly necessary evil presence in the ball games.

You Jimmy P are one of the reasons that umpires such as Mike are ignored at the National Council meetings when there is a change that is needed.

Thanks for nothing, and while you are at it.........
give those game fees back to the little ole church league you work

THAT IS A CUSTOM, TRIED AND TRUE, AROUND HERE.

Dakota Sat Mar 24, 2007 04:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
There is no verbal with the double fist,,,,so the admonition about being a broadcaster or an announcer has no bearing on the discusion.

I understand that you have no intention of changing, let alone admitting you are wrong on this board, but you conveniently overlook the only body motion prescribed for a ball. I also said there were other instructions to umpires on making the ball call, but since you are not interested, I'm not going to waste my time typing them. Suffice it to say, your claim that the fist pounding signal does not violate ASA umpire mechanics and signals is wrong. You can continue to claim it isn't wrong, but it is.

jimpiano Sat Mar 24, 2007 04:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
I understand that you have no intention of changing, let alone admitting you are wrong on this board, but you conveniently overlook the only body motion prescribed for a ball. I also said there were other instructions to umpires on making the ball call, but since you are not interested, I'm not going to waste my time typing them. Suffice it to say, your claim that the fist pounding signal does not violate ASA umpire mechanics and signals is wrong. You can continue to claim it isn't wrong, but it is.

That would be your interpretation, not mine.

jimpiano Sat Mar 24, 2007 04:48pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottk_61
That last sentance says it all.
I may not have worked slow pitch for 35 years but have for 25 plus.
I have had to change mechanics many times over the years and didn't like the changes at first in most cases.
However, I wanted to do the game right so I changed.
The whole thing is attitude, an attitude of respect for the game, players and your fellow blues.

You attitude is one reason the Player Reps and other council members see umpires as a only slightly necessary evil presence in the ball games.

You Jimmy P are one of the reasons that umpires such as Mike are ignored at the National Council meetings when there is a change that is needed.

Thanks for nothing, and while you are at it.........
give those game fees back to the little ole church league you work

THAT IS A CUSTOM, TRIED AND TRUE, AROUND HERE.

I hope you get another 25 years. Umpiring is enjoyable, although I must say I run into more arguments and rude behavior on here than I ever do on the field.:)

Dakota Sat Mar 24, 2007 04:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
...interpretation,...

Reading comprehension, more like.

By majority vote of the members of this forum, I am pleased to present you with the following award.

http://eteamz.active.com/softballump...es/trollof.jpg

For $50 I can have an commemorative embroidered patch made for you to proudly display on your umpire shirt. Let me know.

jimpiano Sat Mar 24, 2007 05:14pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
Reading comprehension, more like.

By majority vote of the members of this forum, I am pleased to present you with the following award.

http://eteamz.active.com/softballump...es/trollof.jpg

For $50 I can have an commemorative embroidered patch made for you to proudly display on your umpire shirt. Let me know.

Disgression is always the better part of valor, even in sophomoric execution.

IRISHMAFIA Sat Mar 24, 2007 05:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
I hope you get another 25 years. Umpiring is enjoyable, although I must say I run into more arguments and rude behavior on here than I ever do on the field.:)

Mr. Pot, there is an easy remedy for that. Feel free to utilize it.

Good bye.

Dakota Sat Mar 24, 2007 05:56pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
Disgression is always the better part of valor, even in sophomoric execution.

I don't know what disgression is, but from your responses in this thread, it is clear you didn't mean discretion.

Either that, or you are announcing that you are turning over a new leaf.

jimpiano Sat Mar 24, 2007 06:35pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
I don't know what disgression is, but from your responses in this thread, it is clear you didn't mean discretion.

Either that, or you are announcing that you are turning over a new leaf.

No, But I will spend more time editing.:)

wadeintothem Sat Mar 24, 2007 09:19pm

How Cuuuuuuuuuute, a slow pitch squabble :D

I would like to remind the noob that slapping fists together might cause the slow pitch umpire to spill his beer, thus making this the worst mechanic ever.

WHOO HOO seasons starting then we can have some real fights.

:cool:

AtlUmpSteve Sat Mar 24, 2007 09:33pm

You don't tug on Superman's cape,
you don't pi$$ in the wind,
you don't pull the mask off the old Lone Ranger,
and you don't bother trying to tell Jimpiano how to umpire, since he knows more than the collective knowledge of this entire board.

Stop pi$$ing in the wind, please.

bkbjones Sat Mar 24, 2007 09:37pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve
You don't tug on Superman's cape,
you don't pi$$ in the wind,
you don't pull the mask off the old Lone Ranger,
and you don't bother trying to tell Jimpiano how to umpire, since he knows more than the collective knowledge of this entire board.

Stop pi$$ing in the wind, please.

And apparently knows more than Merle, Henry, Craig, Kevin, Wild Bill, Larry, Jim, Dave, Jerry, Bernie, Steve...

I have another question, however, about those evals. Jim, what relation were they to you? SRW asked a valid question: is your last name Gilman?:eek:

jimpiano Sat Mar 24, 2007 10:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkbjones
And apparently knows more than Merle, Henry, Craig, Kevin, Wild Bill, Larry, Jim, Dave, Jerry, Bernie, Steve...

I have another question, however, about those evals. Jim, what relation were they to you? SRW asked a valid question: is your last name Gilman?:eek:

Wow.

A technique used by thousands of umpires drives this forum nuts.

I feel honored.

BretMan Sun Mar 25, 2007 08:47am

Another mechanic used by "thousands" of umpires- well, maybe not "thousands", since I haven't personally observed "thousands" doing it, and doubt that you have either- is to announce the location of the pitch, as in "too high", "outside" or, my favorite, "deep".

Since I've seen a lot of umpires do this, does that make it the right thing to do?

If I decide to start using that mechanic in my games, because I feel that it adds something for the participants, does that make it a proper mechanic?

Is this mechanic any more right or wrong than using a non-standard signal to describe the location of the pitch?

jimpiano Sun Mar 25, 2007 09:12am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BretMan
Another mechanic used by "thousands" of umpires- well, maybe not "thousands", since I haven't personally observed "thousands" doing it, and doubt that you have either- is to announce the location of the pitch, as in "too high", "outside" or, my favorite, "deep".

Since I've seen a lot of umpires do this, does that make it the right thing to do?

If I decide to start using that mechanic in my games, because I feel that it adds something for the participants, does that make it a proper mechanic?

Is this mechanic any more right or wrong than using a non-standard signal to describe the location of the pitch?

The manual advises against verbally describing the location of a ball outside the strike zone.

It says nothing about a visual signal concerning the ball hitting the plate.

BretMan Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:43am

If "the manual says" is a valid guideline, the manual also advises against using unauthorized signals.

Since the "fist pound" is not described in said manual, it is an unauthorized signal.

jimpiano Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:37am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BretMan
If "the manual says" is a valid guideline, the manual also advises against using unauthorized signals.

Since the "fist pound" is not described in said manual, it is an unauthorized signal.

As I said before, I have used the signal for years along with countless other contemporaries. If you prefer to use the book as your only guide to signals, that is your choice. I find the signal useful in the lower leagues and is univsersally understood.

Happy umpiring.

scottk_61 Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:52am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
As I said before, I have used the signal for years along with countless other contemporaries. If you prefer to use the book as your only guide to signals, that is your choice. I find the signal useful in the lower leagues and is univsersally understood.

Happy umpiring.

It is not universally understood, and many teams would wonder what in the H#### you are saying with that signal.

why don't you admit that you would rather just do things, "your way" instead of using the prescribed mechanics,
and admit that you pick and choose what guidelines to use in spite of the Umpire Mechanics section of the rule book?

In other words, why don't you admit that you are a dud?
and that you have no desire to change?
and that you are a troll?

etc
etc
etc

jimpiano Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:48pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottk_61
It is not universally understood, and many teams would wonder what in the H#### you are saying with that signal.

why don't you admit that you would rather just do things, "your way" instead of using the prescribed mechanics,
and admit that you pick and choose what guidelines to use in spite of the Umpire Mechanics section of the rule book?

In other words, why don't you admit that you are a dud?
and that you have no desire to change?
and that you are a troll?

etc
etc
etc

Thanks for the advice, although the ad hominems diminish your credibility in my opinion.

I will make sure that in all ASA sanctioned games to follow the guidelines.

scottk_61 Sun Mar 25, 2007 01:16pm

[quote=jimpiano]Thanks for the advice, although the ad hominems diminish your credibility in my opinion.
[quote]

Your opinion of my credibility is NOT one of my greater worries in life.

It is really too bad that you can't just admit that you need to change and adapt to proper mechanics.

jimpiano Sun Mar 25, 2007 03:32pm

[QUOTE=scottk_61][quote=jimpiano]Thanks for the advice, although the ad hominems diminish your credibility in my opinion.
Quote:


Your opinion of my credibility is NOT one of my greater worries in life.

It is really too bad that you can't just admit that you need to change and adapt to proper mechanics.
This forum is not exclusive to ASA, not even umpires.

The leagues I work in all have variations of rules and regulations, none conform to any particular rulebook. The umpires are supervised by the league commissioners.

I do belong to ASA and attend the local clinics. The ASA tournaments are dwindling,however. When working for ASA I do try and follow its guidelines.

The plate signal you so abhor will always be used in the leagues I feel it will be helpful to the players.

Dakota Sun Mar 25, 2007 04:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
...I feel it will be helpful to the players.

You never have answered the question of what the players do differently because of your fist pumping that they would not have done with a simple "ball". So, why and how is it helpful?

jimpiano Sun Mar 25, 2007 04:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
You never have answered the question of what the players do differently because of your fist pumping that they would not have done with a simple "ball". So, why and how is it helpful?

There are two leagues where the signal is helpful. Co-ed and the lowest mens' leagues. Someone is always asking "where was that pitch?" The fist pump quiets everyone when the ball has hit the plate.

Dakota Sun Mar 25, 2007 05:05pm

OK, but then why are you opposed to vocalizing the location of the pitch? Same thing, right?

jimpiano Sun Mar 25, 2007 05:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
OK, but then why are you opposed to vocalizing the location of the pitch? Same thing, right?

Not to me, since a pitch hitting the plate looks pretty to good to most of the players on the field. I never verbalize anything beyond the decision. But I do spend time between innings and after the game helping a neophyte pitcher understand the slow pitch strike zone.

One exception to the verbalization answer. In these lower leagues I use different words on an illegal pitch, at least in the first weeks of the season.

An illegal pitch is either "flat" or too high"(with the appropriate delayed dead ball signal) Most of these novices seem intimidated by the word "illegal" until they understand that they can swing, if they want, at an illegal pitch. Flat and Too High they seem to understand.

Dakota Sun Mar 25, 2007 06:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
...since a pitch hitting the plate looks pretty to good to most of the players on the field...

So do lots of other pitches.

IRISHMAFIA Sun Mar 25, 2007 06:13pm

[quote=jimpiano][quote=scottk_61]
Quote:

Originally Posted by jimpiano
Thanks for the advice, although the ad hominems diminish your credibility in my opinion.

Are you still here?
Quote:

This forum is not exclusive to ASA, not even umpires.
Yet the OP was.

SRW Sun Mar 25, 2007 06:23pm

I am beginning to wonder if this person actually umpires any games. He seems to reply to every post within minutes. Makes me wonder if he's ever on the field working games, showing off his fist pump. Lots of time to reply to posts, tho.

jimpiano Sun Mar 25, 2007 07:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SRW
I am beginning to wonder if this person actually umpires any games. He seems to reply to every post within minutes. Makes me wonder if he's ever on the field working games, showing off his fist pump. Lots of time to reply to posts, tho.

No, the original post was an inquiry about illegal pitches.

Comments about signals for balls hitting the plate came much later.

But it is interesting to note that you suggested a technique that is NOT prescribed by the ASA manual:

---"However, there is a prescribed mechanic for a ball hitting the plate or ground in front of the plate or the batter which is described on page 225 of umpire manual section of the 2007 ASA Umpire Edition of the rules book.

It is a good mechanic to use for all SP games whether stealing is being allowed or not."------

The reference on Page 225 refers only to games with stealing. Without stealing there is no need for any signal since the ball is always dead.

I explained my use of the double fist for balls hitting the plate and how and why I use it and in what level of play. Please explain how your signal, which is also not ASA approved, is better?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1