![]() |
|
|
|||
One mechanic the NCAA manual urges is that the base umpire, on seeing a situation and deciding it is a "no call", should give a "safe" signal. If I see that as PU, I am poaching if I now rule; if BU makes eye contact, we can work out quickly if s/he has it or is looking for assistance (most likely, because no signal, either "safe". or "dead ball", or DDB, means s/he saw something, but doesn't have a clear decision because of position). No signal at all, and no eye contact, tells me that BU hasn't even seen the situation to recognize the situation even needs addressing.
Again, delay and read BU, who has primary responsibility; but, make the call if necessary.
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF Last edited by AtlUmpSteve; Fri Mar 31, 2006 at 08:19pm. |
|
|||
Let's be clear; there is a flip side to this. If there is a play at the plate, and PU is (certainly) watching the play develop and makes the call on a bang-bang play ...... Well, if BU thinks he will now come in and call obstruction by the catcher during that play, because any umpire can call obstruction and PU didn't make eye contact, well, someone's not grasping reality.
![]()
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF |
|
|||
Remember, Steve was talking NCAA. Back to ASA or Fed.
Let's look at if from this point: Show me where it states an umpire should ignored an observed violation due to "primary" responsibilities defined in Rule 10. 10.1.F Each umpire will have the power to make decisions on violation committed during playing time or during suspension of play. It would make no sense to ignore a violation. Coach: Blue, F3 set up near the base and forced my runner to the outside. Umpire: Yep, she sure did. Coach: She would have been safe at 2nd if that didn't happen. Umpire: I believe you are correct, Coach. Coach: Then why didn't you make the obstruction call? Umpire: Not my responsibility, Coach. I think I can safely say that just became a protestable situation with a protest being acknowledged and upheld. The only think prettier on a ball field than seeing two umpires simultaneously give a DDB signal for OBS, is seeing three umpires do it.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
jurisdiction | jimm_ee22 | Basketball | 2 | Fri Dec 09, 2005 03:48pm |
NCAA Umpire Jurisdiction | NSABlue | Softball | 6 | Fri May 06, 2005 07:12am |
Officials Jurisdiction | IREFU2 | Basketball | 12 | Tue Dec 21, 2004 08:51am |
Concurrent Jurisdiction | Ed Austin | Baseball | 4 | Mon Mar 19, 2001 04:50am |
Jurisdiction of call | kchamp | Softball | 11 | Thu Feb 15, 2001 12:17pm |