|
Tue Feb 28, 2006, 02:01pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Then I guess I'm just ASA-stupid as I rarely had problems reading ASA's test. And if everyone on here is correct, I must have a serious problem because part of my job is reviewing RFPs for "holes" and I'm pretty good at it. Anyone in the business world can appreciate this as they would be familiar in the detailed and language-specific manner in which these documents are composed.
As I've noted before, the purpose of communication is to communicate in a manner which the person(s) being addressed understand. Again, as noted a few times before, THE QUESTIONS INCLUDED IN THIS TEST ARE VAGUE! Do they make you think and open the book? The activity on this board demonstrates the obvious positive answer to that question. As far as being "tricky", yeah, some can be. However, IMO, ASA has never even come close to the Fed's level in this field.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
