Quote:
Originally posted by greymule
All these preposterous plays in which a run scores on a pop that would have been foul
|
Would have been caught, maybe. How do you get to "would have been foul except for interference"
Quote:
Originally posted by greymule
ASA does not recognize "flagrant misconduct," except as USC, but even if the umpire invokes USC, the result is the same.
|
There is an ASA case play (10-1 or 10-2, if memory serves ... I don't have my case book with me today) that disallowed a run that had scored on a home run ball due to flagrant misconduct on the part of the batter-runner... but, I'm relying on memory also for the exact nature of the play. But, that is what I was referring to in my answer to mcrowder.
Mon Feb 27, 2006, 04:12pm
Hybrid Mode
