The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 28, 2006, 01:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 382
Runner on 1st , batter hits a ball to 3rd who flicks it to shorstop for a force out .
Runner slides in to 2nd and takes the shortstop out as he is about to throw to 1st .
What do we have , if anything
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 28, 2006, 01:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
If it is a legal slide, nothing.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 28, 2006, 02:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 83
its hard to say without seeing the play, but it sounds legal to me.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 30, 2006, 11:46am
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally posted by Dakota
If it is a legal slide, nothing.
Do you have a definition of an "illegal slide?" What's the penalty for that?

__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 30, 2006, 12:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 964
Do you have a definition of an "illegal slide?"

If NFHS game, then yes, we do.

NFHS: 2-52 Art 2. A slide is illegal if:
the runner uses a rolling or cross-body slide into the fielder;
the runner’s raised leg is higher than the fielder’s knee when the fielder is in a standing position;
the runner goes beyond the base and make contact with or alters the play of the fielder;
the runner slashes or kicks the fielder with either leg; or
the runner tries to injure the fielder.

What's the penalty for that?

8.6.13: the runner is out if the runner does not legally slide and causes illegal contact and/or alters the actions of the fielder in the immediate act of making a play on her. Runners are never required to slide but, if the runner elects to slide, the slide shall be legal.

But - if ASA, probably nothing.

WMB
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 30, 2006, 12:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally posted by SRW
Quote:
Originally posted by Dakota
If it is a legal slide, nothing.
Do you have a definition of an "illegal slide?" What's the penalty for that?

As a matter of fact, we do. NFHS defines illegal slide in rule 2:52:2. For the penalty, see 8:6:13:Penalty.
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 30, 2006, 12:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally posted by WestMichBlue
Do you have a definition of an "illegal slide?"

If NFHS game, then yes, we do.

NFHS: 2-52 Art 2. A slide is illegal if:
the runner uses a rolling or cross-body slide into the fielder;
the runner’s raised leg is higher than the fielder’s knee when the fielder is in a standing position;
the runner goes beyond the base and make contact with or alters the play of the fielder;
the runner slashes or kicks the fielder with either leg; or
the runner tries to injure the fielder.

What's the penalty for that?

8.6.13: the runner is out if the runner does not legally slide and causes illegal contact and/or alters the actions of the fielder in the immediate act of making a play on her. Runners are never required to slide but, if the runner elects to slide, the slide shall be legal.

But - if ASA, probably nothing.

WMB
We must have been posting at the same time! D'oh! (Actually, according to this 3 minutes separates the posts, but I was working and posting at the same time which accounts for the lag on my part.)
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 30, 2006, 03:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back in TX, formerly Seattle area
Posts: 1,279
That's ok. I spent 76 minutes on the phone the other night talking about the same thing over and over and over and over and over...

So 2 times ain't so bad!
__________________
John
An ucking fidiot
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 30, 2006, 09:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 382
Talking

So this statement in the IFS Rule book and I believe you have a similar in ASA , is what .
"When after a runner has been declared out the runner interferes with a defensive plays oppurtunity to make a play on another runner the runner closest to home is also out "

No mention of slide .
Is this a case where the runner who is out must just disappear .
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 30, 2006, 11:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by debeau
So this statement in the IFS Rule book and I believe you have a similar in ASA , is what .
"When after a runner has been declared out the runner interferes with a defensive plays oppurtunity to make a play on another runner the runner closest to home is also out "

No mention of slide .
Is this a case where the runner who is out must just disappear .
The runner has a right to make every effort in an attempt to reach the base safely. As long as the "slide" is to the base and, in the umpire's judgment, not an attempt to interfere with the play, it is nothing.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 31, 2006, 12:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 382
Yours was the reply I was waiting for .
What we saw BU and PU was slightly different from what the coach saw and the player did .
It is important to note this is top mens ball.
The players who slide always are hitting the base and getting up to try for the next base .
We saw that the slide was legal, but the player was out on the force , the fielder leapt up so as not to get "damaged " and was in the act of throwing and moving forward when the runner was lifting up .
The fielder went over and was prevented from throwing .
Both of us had no problem in interference and in fact as I knew this was a big play and knew the players I was just past the pitching strip when I came up with the dead ball.
I was PU .
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 31, 2006, 01:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 964
Debeau: So this statement in the IFS Rule book and I believe you have a similar in ASA , is what .
"When after a runner has been declared out the runner interferes with a defensive plays oppurtunity to make a play on another runner the runner closest to home is also out


This is a retired runner rule. By ISF rules your are correct in calling interference, and calling out the runner closest to home.

But you would not be correct under ASA rules (and NFHS). There interference by a retired runner must be intentional. Some would say that a pop-up slide was intentional, but as you described it, I don't see that as an intentional act to interfer or to break up a DP. I would have "no call."

WMB
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 31, 2006, 01:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 382
I suppose I am at a big advantage as I know the players and how they play .
The pop up slide is certainly used to "inhibit" the fielder.
After all if they are out why pop up .
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 31, 2006, 07:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by debeau
Yours was the reply I was waiting for .
What we saw BU and PU was slightly different from what the coach saw and the player did .
It is important to note this is top mens ball.
The players who slide always are hitting the base and getting up to try for the next base .
We saw that the slide was legal, but the player was out on the force , the fielder leapt up so as not to get "damaged " and was in the act of throwing and moving forward when the runner was lifting up .
The fielder went over and was prevented from throwing .
Both of us had no problem in interference and in fact as I knew this was a big play and knew the players I was just past the pitching strip when I came up with the dead ball.
I was PU .
Now you are changing the scenario. If you had said it was a pop-up slide, and that is what caused the INT, I would have replied differently, but I think you knew that.

The slide is one thing, the pop-up is subsequent to and not part of the slide. INT all the way as you now have described it.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 31, 2006, 11:27am
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Wink

Quote:
Originally posted by bkbjones
That's ok. I spent 76 minutes on the phone the other night talking about the same thing over and over and over and over and over...

So 2 times ain't so bad!
I'm still waiting for the memoirs to be released.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1