The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 16, 2009, 05:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Yet another mouldering thread that has been dug up...
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 16, 2009, 08:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 297
I've always used the front elbow...

Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
I hate this descriptive term, basically because it is an inaccurate measure and too many take the term literally.

What if a team has no letters on the front of their jersey?

What if the name on the front of a jersey is angled? Are we talking the first letter or the last? The highest or lowest?

As a boxer wears his/her trunks high, what if a team wears their name low across their stomach?

Am I starting to get absurd? Yep, just about there. Unfortunately, you still have people citing "the letters" as a strike zone boundary and it just isn't so.

Sorry, one of my pet peeves
This is typically where the "letters" will be. So, if there are no letters then you're still in the right place.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 16, 2009, 08:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeputyUICHousto View Post
This is typically where the "letters" will be. So, if there are no letters then you're still in the right place.
Main Entry:
fa·ce·tious
Pronunciation:
\fə-ˈsē-shəs\
1 : joking or jesting often inappropriately : waggish facetious> 2 : meant to be humorous or funny : not serious facetious remark>
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 24, 2009, 03:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Elat, Israel
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Believe that if you please, but every softball organization with which I am involved says that it is.

And before you start arguing, this is from the 2009 ASA UIC Clinic guide:

Home Plate:
a) If a pitch crosses over the black portion of the plate, it is assumed the pitch crossed over the white portion.
b) If the catcher is touching the black portion of the plate on a force out, it is considered to be also touching the
white portion.
c) If a runner touches the black portion of the plate, it is considered they also touched the white portion.
d) (Slow Pitch) If the ball touches the black portion of the plate, it is considered to have also touched the white
portion.

Does this mean that a Home Plate without the black portion has a narrower strike zone?
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 24, 2009, 04:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Warren, Ohio
Posts: 254
Send a message via Yahoo to umpirebob71
Only if you're pitching.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1