The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 05, 2005, 04:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by DNTXUM P
It is not Don's fault that it didn't pass. If you are into blame, a better target would be Jim Easton, who abstained

No kidding. He didn't want to there to be an appearance of conflict of interest so he abstained. Softball teams everywhere should boycot Easton products for this ______ decision.
Actually, Jim Easton did not abstain. He recused himself in advance. However, did he vote on anything related to any other sports for which Easton produces equipment?

There was no conflict of interest here as any vote does not insure any generated income for his company as the competition in this field is fierce.

But the question still at the top of my list is if Mr. Easton truly believes there would be a COI, why did he accept a position where decisions on many sports must be made on a continual basis?

Also, if he knew this was going to happen, was the USOC informed and, if so, is there a provision for a proxy in the IOC code?

From what I understand, the ISF and other softball factors were comfortable with their position and did not lobby up to the last second, but left to return home.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1