|
Sat Aug 27, 2005, 11:55am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mike,
I will play along, just for discussion where does it say that in the book?. The runner does not know have a clue if the batter / runner is going to be safe at first before they commit interference at second. It was intent. But if that is so, then lets add to the rule book... if the runner was safe before the interference happen we now have USC on the runner causing the interference and throw both him and the coach. Just a thought. Rabbit 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
