The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 30, 2005, 04:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Metro Atlanta
Posts: 870
We all know what a foul tip is. But what is the value of the signal with the finger tips?

If the catcher doesn't catch it, we have a foul ball.

If the cather catches it, we have a live ball.

Since the ball is live until the umpire gives a dead ball signal, why is it necessary to signify that the ball is live? It is wasted motion.

I am not questioning the rules and effects of a foul tip versus a foul ball, but questioning the need to signal it.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 30, 2005, 09:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orange County NY
Posts: 698
Send a message via Yahoo to ASA/NYSSOBLUE
Quote:
Originally posted by tcannizzo
We all know what a foul tip is. But what is the value of the signal with the finger tips?

If the catcher doesn't catch it, we have a foul ball.

If the cather catches it, we have a live ball.

Since the ball is live until the umpire gives a dead ball signal, why is it necessary to signify that the ball is live? It is wasted motion.

I am not questioning the rules and effects of a foul tip versus a foul ball, but questioning the need to signal it.

Because it gets you in the habit of signalling it...because when that tip is strike 3, you HAVE to signal it...and because THEY want you to...thats why! (also a lot of times checked swings result in tips also...)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 30, 2005, 09:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 156
I understand your logic behind THEY wanting us to, but I don't understand why it has to be done on strike three. The prinicple stated above is still correct. If the umpire doesn't call a dead ball, it's live and in play, the batter swung on a third strike so she's out. Maybe something different about it being the third strike exists but is slipping my mind.

I believe this was discussed over on the baseball side quite a while back, with many people's view being tcan's. I think the consensus ended up being, that's how THEY want it done, so that's how WE do it.
__________________
Joshua E. Allen

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2005, 06:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 229
At advanced school several years ago, they taught the group that the foul tip signal was no longer a "preferred mechanic", but simply a strike. They encouraged us to embrace the new non-signal but accepted that old habits . . .
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 31, 2005, 11:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 573
The foul tip signal is a "courtesy signal" as far as I am concerned.
However, ASA says we don't need it and shouldn't indicate it while Fed ball requires it and even has the signal in the charts.

When in Rome.........
__________________
ISF
ASA/USA Elite
NIF
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 01, 2005, 05:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 120
Quote:
Originally posted by tcannizzo
(...) Since the ball is live until the umpire gives a dead ball signal, why is it necessary to signify that the ball is live? It is wasted motion. (...)
Maybe is wasted motion... I don't know the exact reason for this kind of signal (ISF requires it, though).
In my opinion is good to see an umpire who is always aware of the things happening under her/his nose. And if this umpire is conscious that a foul tip occurred, so why don't s/he hadn't to show it to everybody by making a signal?
It's a sort of 'no tag' signal... just to show players + coach + spectators we saw it.

A.
__________________
Antonella
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 01, 2005, 08:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Seems to me that the signal would be helpful in communicating to coaches, runner and infielders that even though they may have heard the ball hit the bat, or that the catcher dug up a lot of dirt/dust on a low pitch that the umpire still considers that ball live and to continue play.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 01, 2005, 10:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Sitch 1 - old mechanic. R1 on first stealing. Pitch foul-tipped. PU gives foul tip signal, R2 achieves 2nd base without a throw. Result: No chirping from the peanut gallery.

Sitch 2 - mechanic of not signaling FT. R1 on fist stealing. Pitch foul-tipped. PU does nothing, R2 achieves 2nd base without a throw. Result: "Time" requested by coach, followed by a conversation explaining that you saw the foul tip, and yes the catcher caught the ball. And yes, you know the rules.

I prefer sitch 1.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 01, 2005, 11:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Metro Atlanta
Posts: 870
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Seems to me that the signal would be helpful in communicating to coaches, runner and infielders that even though they may have heard the ball hit the bat, or that the catcher dug up a lot of dirt/dust on a low pitch that the umpire still considers that ball live and to continue play.

But it does not help F2. The player with the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 01, 2005, 03:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by tcannizzo
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Seems to me that the signal would be helpful in communicating to coaches, runner and infielders that even though they may have heard the ball hit the bat, or that the catcher dug up a lot of dirt/dust on a low pitch that the umpire still considers that ball live and to continue play.

But it does not help F2. The player with the ball.
Don't care about F2. That player should know the situation since that person should be prepared to make any play in front of them, foul tip or not. The C should also be aware of whether the ball was caught or not.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 01, 2005, 04:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back in TX, formerly Seattle area
Posts: 1,279
Wait a minute

If "They" don't want it, say at Advanced National School, and it's an old mechanic but still accepted...

THEN WHY IN THE HELL IS IT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PAGE ON SIGNALS IN THE ASA UMPIRE MANUAL.

Timing play signal isn't there, but a lot of people use it, and I would hope it gains acceptance since it is a valuable signal/mechanic in many situations.

The horrible (IMHO) mechanic of pointing to the upper left chest with just the index finger when you have an infield fly with one out isn't in there, but a LOT of people use it.

The foul tip signal is there. Use it.IMHO it is far more valuable, for reasons described above, then it is to not use it and conserve the three calories of energy used to signal it.
__________________
John
An ucking fidiot
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 01, 2005, 04:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Metro Atlanta
Posts: 870
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Quote:
Originally posted by tcannizzo
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Seems to me that the signal would be helpful in communicating to coaches, runner and infielders that even though they may have heard the ball hit the bat, or that the catcher dug up a lot of dirt/dust on a low pitch that the umpire still considers that ball live and to continue play.

But it does not help F2. The player with the ball.
Don't care about F2. That player should know the situation since that person should be prepared to make any play in front of them, foul tip or not. The C should also be aware of whether the ball was caught or not.
Then why would you care about everyone else that you mentioned in your post? Shouldn't the same thing apply to them?

Everyone on the field knows that C caught the ball, including C.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 01, 2005, 06:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 74
When I do it, I do it sharp and crisp and it looks good. That's why I do it. It's the same signal I give by polishing my shoes. I want to look like an umpire that knows what he's doing, whether I do or not.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 01, 2005, 07:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Re: Wait a minute

Quote:
Originally posted by bkbjones

Timing play signal isn't there, but a lot of people use it, and I would hope it gains acceptance since it is a valuable signal/mechanic in many situations.

The horrible (IMHO) mechanic of pointing to the upper left chest with just the index finger when you have an infield fly with one out isn't in there, but a LOT of people use it.

I have no idea what a "timing play signal" is and have never seen the IF signal you suggested.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 01, 2005, 09:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orange County NY
Posts: 698
Send a message via Yahoo to ASA/NYSSOBLUE
Re: Wait a minute

Quote:
Originally posted by bkbjones
If "They" don't want it, say at Advanced National School, and it's an old mechanic but still accepted...

THEN WHY IN THE HELL IS IT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PAGE ON SIGNALS IN THE ASA UMPIRE MANUAL.

Timing play signal isn't there, but a lot of people use it, and I would hope it gains acceptance since it is a valuable signal/mechanic in many situations.

The horrible (IMHO) mechanic of pointing to the upper left chest with just the index finger when you have an infield fly with one out isn't in there, but a LOT of people use it.


'Timing signal'?????


also, I have never seen that inf fly signal either.....we around here DO remind each other, however, how many outs by either the no or one out signal to the side simultaneous with the hand to the chest...

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1