The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 27, 2005, 10:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: West Michigan (Comstock Park)
Posts: 176
Situation during per-game of this afternoons high school varsity softball DH (Michigan). We check bats. I find one bat without ANY stamp (2000 or ASA). I inform coach that as I and my partner understand the bat needs to have a proper stamp and this paticualr bat will not be used today. Coach replies that bat is "pre 2000" and does not need any stamp. We did not allow use of bat during game. Any other understanding regarding legal bats?
__________________
Perfection is a goal which we work to attain
NFHS/Little League
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 27, 2005, 10:33pm
Never Stop Learning
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 518
Coach is right if in your opion it was in fact manufactured prior to 2000 and, if tested, would comply with the ASA bat performance standards then in effect. If it is on the approved bat list it would also be okay. Also if it is on the ASA Banned List it would not be able to be used unless it had the ASA approved recertification mark.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 28, 2005, 02:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Are you sure, Ed? I didn't think NFHS allowed the "umpire judgment" exception. They didn't used to, anyway.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 28, 2005, 07:07am
JEL JEL is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 910
Regarding NFHS play, as we were instructed in 2004, (we play fall SB in GA will start up in august), If a bat does not have the proper ASA markings, and is not on the banned list, the coach must show it is legal for play using the approved list. Each home team was required to post in BOTH dugouts the current banned list as well as the approved list. Saw very few lists during the season, and none at the playoffs, or state championship. I also only found one bat with no cetification mark all season long.

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 28, 2005, 08:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by Dakota
Are you sure, Ed? I didn't think NFHS allowed the "umpire judgment" exception. They didn't used to, anyway.
According to the HS clinics around here, the umpire was to use ASA's standard which includes pre-2000 bats.

Look at it this way. Would you not allow a player to use a wooden softball bat in a HS game? Not on the approved bat list, many, if not all, do not have any certification stamps and you know darn well they are legal.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 28, 2005, 09:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: West Michigan (Comstock Park)
Posts: 176
Thanks for the responses. Odd thing that I choose not to mention in my initial comments is that my umpire partner and I thought it "strange" that after we told coach in dugout about bat (who understood) the head coach, who was hitting infield practice, became "defensive" about the bat just prior to us informing him that the 1 bat would not be used. Seems to me that this was not the first time he was told about the bat with no stamps. As for wood bats, sure we would allow them, provided they were not cracked. Wood bats are quit a different "animal" than metal bats.
__________________
Perfection is a goal which we work to attain
NFHS/Little League
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 28, 2005, 11:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
In NFHS, bats must have one of the seals or be on the approved list. No "umpire judgement" acceptance is allowed. The rule (which includes reference to the ASA list) and case say "2004 ASA Bat Performance Standard", not just the ASA rule.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1