Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Quote:
Originally posted by CecilOne
I don't remember anything in the OBS rules about initial non-possession versus secondary non-possession.
|
... snip ... In this case, when the runner tried to progress further and the catcher without the ball fell on her, THAT is obstruction.
|
1) I agreed with you about ("
a catcher not in possession of the ball FALLING on top of the runner after the initial play").
2) The phrase "
catcher without the ball fell on her, THAT is obstruction" is the secondary non-possession I referred to. The point being that impeding the runner without having possession is OBS, even if the fielder had possession previously.
Sat May 28, 2005, 01:05pm
Threaded Mode
