The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 04, 2005, 06:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by debeau
As suggested by mcrowder and a god suggestion I might add so as to not hijack a thread.
How we treat obstruction .
In New Zealand if a player is obstructed they are protected between the bases they were obstructed .Same all over the world I hope .
However I note that some umpires determine on the hit where the runner will end up ie Mentally I say that is a 3 bagger so if they stop on first after being obstructed the umpire will give them 3rd .
In NZ we only give them the base that they attempt to go to.
So in same scenario they would only get 1st as that is all they have tried for .
Reasoning is we dont know they even would have gone for 3rd, they may be lazy .
I am sure this is mcrowders interpretation and some others but it would be nice to get some others thoughts .
Well, that is certainly a departure from ISF rules.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1