The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 28, 2005, 10:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Finally had our recert meeting this weekend. There was a question near the end (#98 or #99, I believe) regarding a batter swinging and missing, recocking, and then hitting the ball. I believe the answer in the key and the rule referenced by the key didn't match. It appeared that this should not be a legal hit, but we couldn't find the rule, and it generated a good deal of disagreement.

What is the right answer, and the rule reference to support that?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 28, 2005, 10:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
Read POE 24, Section C. That should clarify it for you.
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 28, 2005, 01:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Thanks. That at least confirms the correct answer. I am curious though --- normally the POE's and casebook are there to interpret or clarify existing rules. I can't for the life of me find a rule that specifically doesn't allow the batter to swing a 2nd time (or a rule that disallows a hit on the follow-through, which is also mentioned in that caseplay as being a dead ball). What rule is being used here?

[Edited by mcrowder on Feb 28th, 2005 at 02:41 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 28, 2005, 01:54pm
JEL JEL is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 910
7.4-3 is the case book play.

If you don't have a case book, it is well worth the 20 bucks to get it! (15.00 + 5.95 S/H)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 28, 2005, 02:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Thanks. I have the caseplay, and I have the POE. And I now know the "right" answer.

What I'm looking for now is the rule from which the caseplay and POE are derived from.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 28, 2005, 02:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by mcrowder
Thanks. I have the caseplay, and I have the POE. And I now know the "right" answer.

What I'm looking for now is the rule from which the caseplay and POE are derived from.
7.4.C
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 28, 2005, 04:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Quote:
Originally posted by mcrowder
Thanks. I have the caseplay, and I have the POE. And I now know the "right" answer.

What I'm looking for now is the rule from which the caseplay and POE are derived from.
7.4.C
It is clear from the case play rule reference that the first swing is a strike. The batter has therefore completed the legal actions by a batter for that pitch. The second swing, therefore, cannot be a batted ball.

7-6-K-3 deals with hitting the ball on the follow-through after a swing and a miss as an EXCEPTION to the hitting the ball a second time rule. This is a foul ball.

The rules do not specifically deal with a second swing and hit after a first swing and miss, but the ruling provided in the case play apparently applies the dead-ball logic from 7-6-K-3, even though it is not a foul ball (since it was already a swing and a miss).

IOW, the case play fills in the ruling for this situation.

An umpire taking the test without the case book could arrive logically at the ruling by following the reasoning above.

JMR (just my rationalization)
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 28, 2005, 06:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by Dakota
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Quote:
Originally posted by mcrowder
Thanks. I have the caseplay, and I have the POE. And I now know the "right" answer.

What I'm looking for now is the rule from which the caseplay and POE are derived from.
7.4.C
It is clear from the case play rule reference that the first swing is a strike. The batter has therefore completed the legal actions by a batter for that pitch. The second swing, therefore, cannot be a batted ball.

7-6-K-3 deals with hitting the ball on the follow-through after a swing and a miss as an EXCEPTION to the hitting the ball a second time rule. This is a foul ball.

The rules do not specifically deal with a second swing and hit after a first swing and miss, but the ruling provided in the case play apparently applies the dead-ball logic from 7-6-K-3, even though it is not a foul ball (since it was already a swing and a miss).

IOW, the case play fills in the ruling for this situation.

An umpire taking the test without the case book could arrive logically at the ruling by following the reasoning above.

JMR (just my rationalization)
Just read the effect of the rule. "The ball is in play and the runners may advance with liability to be put out" should tell you something.

Check out POE 24C.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1