electronic scorebook

[BretMan]

WMB,

I see your point as far as preventing any potential problems and personally don't have a problem with wanting cell phones off the field.

But, to paraphrase from your post, I want to keep personal opinion out of my game management. How would you respond if you asked a coach to leave the cell phone behind and he refused based on Case Play 3.6.10(A)?

Besides nearly fainting because a coach referenced a specific Case Play, you would seem to now be painted in a corner. If you then allow the device it makes it look like you were uncertain of the rule (your credibility takes a hit) or that you are overstepping your bounds (being an overly-officious official).

I'm all for leaving the cell phones in the dugout, but since they are not banned I'm uncomfortable with asking the coaches to remove them.

[WestMichBlue]

Originally Posted by BretMan

WMB,

I see your point as far as preventing any potential problems and personally don't have a problem with wanting cell phones off the field.

But, to paraphrase from your post, I want to keep personal opinion out of my game management. How would you respond if you asked a coach to leave the cell phone behind and he refused based on Case Play 3.6.10(A)?

Besides nearly fainting because a coach referenced a specific Case Play, you would seem to now be painted in a corner. If you then allow the device it makes it look like you were uncertain of the rule (your credibility takes a hit) or that you are overstepping your bounds (being an overly-officious official).

I'm all for leaving the cell phones in the dugout, but since they are not banned I'm uncomfortable with asking the coaches to remove them.

In 2002 NFHS first addressed the issue of electronic communications devices by stating that, "the coach shall not be in possession of any object in the coach's box other than scorekeeping devices." However, the rule they wrote (3-6.11) did not prohibit the possession of the device, only the use of it for coaching purposes. While those two statements seem incompatabile, the NFHS could not outlaw phones, as the coach may will have a legal need for a phone (ie., medical, fire, or police responder). So basically they are saying to the umpires to not allow cell phones unless the coach provides a valid reason for needing instant access.

The case plays support that position, and that is basically what I said. So I don't think I would be "painted in a corner." I have support for saying "no" to cell phones, but would have to allow it for a valid reason.

WMB

[BretMan]

3.6.10 Situation A: During the game it is brought to the attention of the plate umpire that the third-base coach of Team B has a cell phone or pager in her possession while in the coach's box. When the plate umpire inquires with the third-base coach, the coach responds that she is a doctor and has the device for medical response reasons only. Is this legal?
Ruling: Yes, since the communication device is not used for coaching purposes, it is legal. (8-6-13)

I don't read that "ruling" as concluding that the cell phone is legal because "the coach provided a valid reason". It is legal because it is not being used for coaching purposes. And it certainly doesn't equate to an outright ban.

But, then again, this would not be the first poorly worded or ambiguous Case Play in the history of softball!