electronic scorebook

Skahtboi · #1 (**permalink**) Fri Nov 30, 2007, 12:11pm

Since this is the time of year when the boards are slow, I have been revisting some of the old posts just for fun. I was wondering, on this thread, how have the years and the prevalence of PDA's...etc. affected how you think about this?

MNBlue · #2 (**permalink**) Fri Nov 30, 2007, 12:16pm

I have only witnessed one assistant coach use an electronic scoring device (a PDA in this case). She stays in the bench area and uses it as a score book.

If it were to be used to look up past stats, how would that be a violation? If she had a paper scorebook, she could do the same thing. As long as it doesn't violate 3-3-1m , I don't see any problem with it.

Scooby · #3 (**permalink**) Fri Nov 30, 2007, 12:19pm

The problem is how do you know if she is keeping score or texting someone?

Mountaineer · #4 (**permalink**) Fri Nov 30, 2007, 12:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scooby

The problem is how do you know if she is keeping score or texing someone?

Same with a PDA . . . I can send messages to other PDA's and if there's a wireless network in the area I can access internet. You can't know that.

#5 (**permalink**) Fri Nov 30, 2007, 06:21pm

Not to be a crazy devil's advocate, but if someone could look up past stats in a paper scorebook, they could also be looking up a scouting report or a list of "stolen signals". So do we go so far to ban the paper scorebook as well? I don't do FED, but I do work ASA. There is no ban on using electronic devices in ASA as long as it's for scorekeeping purposes. How do far do you police the stuff? How far are you willing to go before you end up not working team A's games in the future because you were OOO about these things? This would have to be a situation by situation thing, and may take some "honor system" guts to allow.

BretMan · #6 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 01, 2007, 02:24am

WMB,

I see your point as far as preventing any potential problems and personally don't have a problem with wanting cell phones off the field.

But, to paraphrase from your post, I want to keep personal opinion out of my game management. How would you respond if you asked a coach to leave the cell phone behind and he refused based on Case Play 3.6.10(A)?

Besides nearly fainting because a coach referenced a specific Case Play, you would seem to now be painted in a corner. If you then allow the device it makes it look like you were uncertain of the rule (your credibility takes a hit) or that you are overstepping your bounds (being an overly-officious official).

I'm all for leaving the cell phones in the dugout, but since they are not banned I'm uncomfortable with asking the coaches to remove them.

WestMichBlue · #7 (**permalink**) Sun Dec 02, 2007, 02:54am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BretMan

WMB,

I see your point as far as preventing any potential problems and personally don't have a problem with wanting cell phones off the field.

But, to paraphrase from your post, I want to keep personal opinion out of my game management. How would you respond if you asked a coach to leave the cell phone behind and he refused based on Case Play 3.6.10(A)?

Besides nearly fainting because a coach referenced a specific Case Play, you would seem to now be painted in a corner. If you then allow the device it makes it look like you were uncertain of the rule (your credibility takes a hit) or that you are overstepping your bounds (being an overly-officious official).

I'm all for leaving the cell phones in the dugout, but since they are not banned I'm uncomfortable with asking the coaches to remove them.

In 2002 NFHS first addressed the issue of electronic communications devices by stating that, "the coach shall not be in possession of any object in the coach's box other than scorekeeping devices." However, the rule they wrote (3-6.11) did not prohibit the possession of the device, only the use of it for coaching purposes. While those two statements seem incompatabile, the NFHS could not outlaw phones, as the coach may will have a legal need for a phone (ie., medical, fire, or police responder). So basically they are saying to the umpires to not allow cell phones unless the coach provides a valid reason for needing instant access.

The case plays support that position, and that is basically what I said. So I don't think I would be "painted in a corner." I have support for saying "no" to cell phones, but would have to allow it for a valid reason.

WMB

AtlUmpSteve · #8 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 01, 2007, 01:12pm

Personally, I do not tell coaches that they cannot have cell phones on the field. What I tell them is if they answer it, or look at it on the field, I cannot and will not guess what they are or are not doing, and would have to disqualify them from coaching for the rest of the game.

Generally, they either remove it, don't answer it when it rings, or tell me a story that I can live with. These instances include I am on-call at work, and it is a remote possibility that I would be called, but I will accept the penalty if it happens rather than lose my job, or (heard this several times) my wife is expecting any moment, and I have to know if she goes into labor, or something similarly valid.

Just how I, personally, handle cellphones, PDA's, pagers, etc. I did once have a coach get an urgent text message, which he immediately showed me, rather than risk me thinking he was cheating.

IRISHMAFIA · #9 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 01, 2007, 07:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve

or (heard this several times) my wife is expecting any moment, and I have to know if she goes into labor, or something similarly valid.

So, what are they going to do if they get a call telling them their wife is going into labor? If a call can be made to his/her phone, one can certainly be made to 911. If the coach means to be involved in the delivery of the child, what the hell is s/he doing on the damn ballfield?!?!