The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 03, 2004, 09:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1
OK,here we go again! Is there a new ASA rule preventing fastpitch girls from using a batting helmet with their names airbrushed on them???????? This is the second ASA Tournament in Louisiana that we have heard that NO PAINTED helmets would be allowed. Whats the rules say?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 03, 2004, 09:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: woodville, tx
Posts: 3,156
Quote:
Originally posted by cajunmagic
OK,here we go again! Is there a new ASA rule preventing fastpitch girls from using a batting helmet with their names airbrushed on them???????? This is the second ASA Tournament in Louisiana that we have heard that NO PAINTED helmets would be allowed. Whats the rules say?
cajunmagic,

Go here: http://www.officialforum.com/thread/13236

What part of La. you from?

BTW Welcome to the board.

__________________
glen _______________________________
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things
that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover."
--Mark Twain.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 03, 2004, 09:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 858
Painted Helmets

There is nothing about painted helmets in the ASA 2004 Official Rules of Softball (Umpire Edition) in Rule 3.E.

Rule 3.E does talk about are broken, cracked, dented or helmets that have been illegally altered are prohibited from use. Maybe this is where the confusion is.

When I see a painted helmet, I allow it to be used as long as it meets all the other standards of being legal.

Michael
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 03, 2004, 10:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by cajunmagic
OK,here we go again! Is there a new ASA rule preventing fastpitch girls from using a batting helmet with their names airbrushed on them???????? This is the second ASA Tournament in Louisiana that we have heard that NO PAINTED helmets would be allowed. Whats the rules say?
The rules don't say anything about paint. There is no ASA rule forbidding painted helmets. There isn't even a rule which mandates they all be the same color.

The only possible thing someone down your way could be using is the clause which includes the phrase "illegally altered". As long as the helmet is not cracked, broken, dented or illegally altered cannot be worn. To me, illegally altered means that something was done to the structure of the helmet which makes it unsafe.

As long as the helmet is in good shape and I can see the NOCSAE stamp, it's good to go.

The next time you are told this, your team should demand to see it in writing PRIOR to paying an entry fee.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 03, 2004, 10:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: woodville, tx
Posts: 3,156
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by cajunmagic
OK,here we go again! Is there a new ASA rule preventing fastpitch girls from using a batting helmet with their names airbrushed on them???????? This is the second ASA Tournament in Louisiana that we have heard that NO PAINTED helmets would be allowed. Whats the rules say?
Hell, cajun's can't even spell ASA....Can they read? Look
it up....

Oh hell, this is the wrong thread for that.

J/K'ing. I work with the Lake Charles group all the time.
Gene Loar, Troy Brown, Morgan Manyard and others.

__________________
glen _______________________________
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things
that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover."
--Mark Twain.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 04, 2004, 09:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Almere (NL)
Posts: 370
Although I don't think it's wrong to have painted helmets, there could be a small chemical basis for the use of the "illegal altered helmets"-rule. When the used paint contains "weakeners", then the helmets aren't save anymore to use. The plastics will be more or less become fluid... And then therfor it's illegal altered. Beware: you can't see it (besides the paint)!!!

Not all the brush-paints have those weakeners (think about MethylEthylKeton/ Toluene/ (Cyclo)Hexane etc.)... In Europe most paints are forbidden to have those chemicals. We are indeed afraid for OPS, a problem which lots of painters suffer. Some can't remember a thing or gotten crazy...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 04, 2004, 09:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Alex,

I agree with the chemical engineering part of it, but umpires cannot be expected to be experts in paint / plastic chemistry. And, I seriously doubt (short of taking a sample back to the lab) any expert could tell the difference between a factory decoration option, a factory approved paint job, a private paint job using factory approved paint, or a paint job using "weakening" paint.

One this is very clear, however....

Some sanctioning bodies (LL comes to mind) outlaw painted helmets (which I would assume would include factory decoration options that look like a painted helmet), but ...

ASA rules do not say one word about paint on helments.

Therefore, any local ASA-sanctioned organization that is outlawing painted helmets is enforcing a local rule. They owe it to the teams playing in their league or tournament to put local rules in writing.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 04, 2004, 03:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 414
Earlier it was said that the Manufacturer would void any warranty & liability if the helmet was painted. Shouldn't that be enough to convince these Leagues to disallow that practice.
.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 04, 2004, 05:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10
Myths about helmet painting never die

Hands are part of the bat, too.

Our team's softball helmets were custom painted by the manufacturer, Riddell, using the very same paint that it uses for FOOTBALL HELMETS. Apparently, the "mysterious chemical reaction weakens the helmet" theory doesn't prevent virtually every football team in America from having their helmets painted. Yet the myth persists in softball. And will survive this thread.

Bottom line: ASA doesn't prohibit painted helmets.



Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 04, 2004, 09:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 298
Let it go. We have way to many other things to worry about between the lines.
__________________
We Don't Look for Problems.....They find Us.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 04, 2004, 11:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Re: Myths about helmet painting never die

Quote:
Originally posted by EugeneCoug
Our team's softball helmets were custom painted by the manufacturer, Riddell, using the very same paint that it uses for FOOTBALL HELMETS. Apparently, the "mysterious chemical reaction weakens the helmet" theory doesn't prevent virtually every football team in America from having their helmets painted. Yet the myth persists in softball. And will survive this thread.
It is not a myth, but obviously there exists paint that will NOT damage the integrity of the helmet. Factory approved paint would fall in this category. I would guess that MOST paint will not damage the helmet, but certain ones will. The chemically react with the polymers in the helmet shell. For this reason, the manufacturer voids the warranty (as said earlier) if an unauthorized shop repaints the helmet.

Be that as it may, I don't think this is something the umpires should be involved with (and therefore it is not something the rule books should concern themselves with). It should remain between the consumer and the manufacturer.

"Having their helmets painted" - I would assume if a school is doing this, they have the good sense to have it done by a reputable shop who knows what type of paint to use. Football players usually do not have their parents individually paint (or have painted) their helmets, so the analogy doesn't hold up. It is mainly an issue of "doing it right." The last time I checked, each of the helmet manufacturers provide information on how to go about getting their helmets properly painted.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1