The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Softball (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/)
-   -   True or False (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/13538-true-false.html)

IRISHMAFIA Wed May 05, 2004 08:39pm

Speaking ASA

F6, standing in the base path, is attempting to pick up a ground ball which has bounced off his chest. R2 runs into F6 and should be called out.


ChampaignBlue Wed May 05, 2004 08:56pm

True.

JEL Wed May 05, 2004 09:02pm

True, (question 10)

TexBlue Wed May 05, 2004 10:45pm

Quote:

Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Speaking ASA

F6, standing in the base path, is attempting to pick up a ground ball which has bounced off his chest. R2 runs into F6 and should be called out.


I'm not sure, I don't call adult softball. Now, if it bounces off HER chest, it's


TRUE. http://www.stopstart.freeserve.co.uk/smilie/bigwave.gif

bethsdad Thu May 06, 2004 12:59am

Was it intentional? If not I'll go with false. Brian

whiskers_ump Thu May 06, 2004 05:43am

Sounds like an 8-7-J5. That would be considered a
deflected ball in my HO. However, the play did not
state it was intentional.

buddha69 Thu May 06, 2004 07:09am

True

greymule Thu May 06, 2004 08:09am

Mike, I'm surprised you posed such an easy question.

IRISHMAFIA Thu May 06, 2004 09:39am

Quote:

Originally posted by greymule
Mike, I'm surprised you posed such an easy question.
Apparently not.

The answer is true.

Cite: Casebook 1-74
Rule 1-Interference
Rule 8.7.J


kono Thu May 06, 2004 09:43am

Without any rulebook or casebook in front of my...

Is this the "step and reach" guideline?? On the small-ball side of the house it goes something like this: If a fielder muffs a catch, but the ball is within a step and reach - the fielder is still protected. Any farther than a step and reach places the fielder in jeopardy of causing obstruction.

Skahtboi Thu May 06, 2004 10:19am

Quote:

Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Quote:

Originally posted by greymule
Mike, I'm surprised you posed such an easy question.
Apparently not.

The answer is true.

Cite: Casebook 1-74
Rule 1-Interference
Rule 8.7.J


Dang! I didn't get a chance to register my answer. So I will say "true," and cite rule 8:7:J as my reasoning! :D

bethsdad Thu May 06, 2004 10:37am

I was going with 8.7.J (5) I don't have a casebook.

ChampaignBlue Thu May 06, 2004 12:32pm

Kono, it's because it's a deflected batted ball and there is a fielder that can still make an out who is attempting to field it. Picture a ball that bounces off the 2nd baseman's glove and the 1st baseman is trying to field it but gets bumped by R1, you'd clearly have an out. In the case Mike gave the deflection was by and to the same fielder is all, one step or five makes no difference.

greymule Thu May 06, 2004 01:08pm

I don't believe that a ball the bounces off F4's chest is considered deflected if F4 is trying to pick it up. A ball that caroms off F3 (or, more likely, F1) and then goes to F4 would be a deflected ball. Interference in that case does require intent.

Dakota Thu May 06, 2004 01:28pm

Quote:

Originally posted by greymule
I don't believe that a ball the bounces off F4's chest is considered deflected if F4 is trying to pick it up. A ball that caroms off F3 (or, more likely, F1) and then goes to F4 would be a deflected ball. Interference in that case does require intent.
ASA POE 32
Quote:

It is interference if the batted ball ricochets off one defensive player and any player has the opportunity to make an out.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1