The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 11, 2004, 02:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 964
Well, I still disagree with most of you. The "hurdling" note used to follow rules of interference against a defender making a play on the runner. But it was moved two years ago to where it no longer relates to a defender making a play on a runner.

Now you may suggest that this movement is a mistake (poor editing. You can say the note is applicable anywhere (even though you normally agree that notes, exceptions, effect, and penalties only apply to the preceeding text). Or you can accept it as written, even though we don't know why the NFHS decided to do this.

By Glens game situation, this discussion is a moot point because the runner can be called out for illegal contact (8.6.13).

However - what if the runner had cleared the catcher. What if there was no contact. Then I believe, as the book is written now - that you have a legal avoidance of the defender by the runner. So if you had Obstruction called and the catcher tagged the flying runner you have to protected the runner to home.

ASA guru's - what would your call be (rule ref. please) if a runner high jumped a defender to reach the base?

WMB
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1