The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 02, 2004, 07:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by greymule
Yes, I am aware that the armpits are the top of the zone—in the book. How many umps at high levels call a pitch at the armpits a strike?
Okay, let's review.

Andy jokingly suggested redefining the strike zone to help eliminate 50% of the arguments on eteamz.

I suggested that wouldn't be a problem. If he could give a definitive point for the top of the strike zone, I would consider taking it to the NUS for a possible rule change.

To offer the same definition wouldn't exactly be "redefining" anything, let alone worthy of a change in the rule.

Hence, the redundancy of your offer.



__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1