The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 06, 2019, 10:43am
Official Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
commentary on IFR

From a Philadelphia sports columnist:

Let’s begin by recognizing that the infield fly rule is unique and inspires deep thought and discussion. In 1975, a law student at Penn named William S. Stevens published “The Common Law Origins of the Infield Fly Rule” in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review. It is scholarly, slightly tongue-in-cheek, and, quite unexpectedly, birthed a school of academic thought applying the concepts of the rule through the ages. If you have a few spare moments, read Anthony D’Amato’s “The Contribution of the Infield Fly Rule to Western Civilization (and Vice Versa),” published in 2006 by the Northwestern University Law Review. It is also a page-turner.

Interesting stuff, but the rule came about just before the turn of the century because teams were finding ways to substitute success for sportsmanship, or something like that. The Baltimore Orioles, managed by John McGraw, a conniver if ever there was one, didn’t invent faking catches to trap runners, but they perfected it. The rule came into being shortly thereafter and was altered a few times — deleting bunts and line drives, for instance — and stands today still guarding the integrity of the game against what the writers of the rule called “subterfuge.”

Fine, but why not put the rule in effect for any force situation, such as Monday night’s in San Diego that ended up costing the Phillies one of their prime contributors?

Fortunately, we have among us, someone with the answer.

Peter E. Meltzer, a partner with the Philadelphia law firm of Weber Gallagher, is also the author of four books, one of which is the excellent, “So You Think You Know Baseball? A Fan’s Guide to the Official Rules.”

One chapter in the book is devoted to the infield fly rule, and great examples of its proper implementation. That rainy, windy night in Citizens Bank Park when the Phillies were attempting to close out Tampa Bay in the 2008 World Series is in there, recounting the Pedro Feliz popup to first base with runners on first and second. The rule was not invoked, because, in the estimation of the umpire, given the conditions, snagging it required more than the “ordinary effort” test of the rule. Carlos Pena caught it anyway.

“The infield fly rule is a complicated rule, but it’s fair,” Meltzer said. “With just a runner on first, there should be no risk of a double play. If there are runners on second and third, the third baseman could let the ball drop, touch third, throw to second and there is nothing the offensive players can do about it. With just a runner on first, the batting team assumes the risk of not running hard to first base.”

In other words, if the batter who popped up with just a runner on first doesn’t get himself down the line, the game of baseball will not bail him out. His action forces the defense to catch the ball. (Of course, if it were a speedy runner on base and a slower one at the plate, the infielder could choose to let the ball drop, take the force at second, and essentially swap baserunners. But there shouldn’t be the risk of a double play.) It is up to the batter to keep the defense honest, and if he doesn’t, that’s on him.

“That’s exactly right,” Meltzer said. “The batting team has it in its control to avoid a double play when there’s a runner on first base, but doesn’t have it with runners on first and second.”
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 06, 2019, 09:07pm
Official Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Northeast Nebraska
Posts: 770
Thanks for posting this. Baseball history is incredibly interesting. 140 years of playing the "same game" on different sized diamonds with different sized and colored balls, and there are still new things happening every year.

I remind my mentees this very same thing: The infield fly rule exists to prevent the defense from stealing a double or triple play. Yes, the offense suffers one out, but it's there to protect the offense from multiple outs.
Powder blue since 1998. Longtime forum lurker.
Umpiring Goals: Call the knee strike accurately (getting the low pitch since 2017)/NCAA D1 postseason/ISF-WBSC Certification/Nat'l Indicator Fraternity(completed)
"I'm gonna call it ASA for the foreseeable future. You all know what I mean."
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Commentary on officiating.... JRutledge Basketball 20 Mon Apr 10, 2017 04:25pm
First time I've seen this.........and commentary just another ref Basketball 20 Wed Jan 11, 2017 06:38pm
Commentary just another ref Basketball 2 Tue Aug 31, 2010 02:37pm
Play-by-Play Commentary FC IC Basketball 2 Sat Dec 21, 2002 12:28am
More Howler Monkey Commentary: Larks Basketball 3 Mon Dec 16, 2002 02:50pm

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41am.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1